Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Revisiting a criterion for UPE creations: evidence please |
→Standard of evidence: Reply |
||
Line 140:
*:G11 applies to "unambiguous" promotion and "pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to serve as encyclopedia articles". The intention is that this would be broader. That's what I was wondering if we might need an extra bullet to explain. – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 12:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
*::Where is the consensus that such pages should be deleted rather than fixed? [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 13:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
*:::I mean, do you want to spend your time fixing something like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=Draft%3ABigbasket×tamp=20220521003639 this], so somebody else can get paid for it? – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 13:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
:If it only applies to articles, then why can’t it be solved by draftification? Draftification would have the advantage of nonadmins being able to see what’s going on. [[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 13:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||