Revision as of 14:00, 10 July 2024 edit Thryduulf (talk \| contribs) Oversighters, Administrators 96,138 edits →‎Standard of evidence: if you want to waste the community's time that's your choice Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:04, 10 July 2024 edit undo Joe Roe (talk \| contribs) Checkusers, Administrators 40,722 edits →‎Standard of evidence: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 154: ::::And you and Thryduulf have made that same point numerous times now; I respectfully disagree. If you are right, then an RfC on this proposed criterion will not gain consensus and you have nothing to worry about. In the mean time, I would really like to focus on workshopping the actual proposal text. – [[User:Joe Roe\|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe\|talk]])</small> 13:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC) :::::You can choose to waste the community's time on an RFC that is doomed to failure if you wish, alternatively you can start listening to the feedback you've solicited and formulate a proposal that meets all the requirements of [[WP:NEWCSD]] and thus stands a chance of succeeding. [[User:Thryduulf\|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf\|talk]]) 14:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC) ::::::You will have noticed that you and SmokeyJoe are not the ''only'' people who have responded above. – [[User:Joe Roe\|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe\|talk]])</small> 14:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC) == Blanking ==

Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion: Difference between revisions