Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 19:08, 31 December 2023 edit P Aculeius (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 19,776 edits →‎Proposed move of Ab urbe condita (Livy) to History of Rome (Livy): new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:33, 30 May 2024 edit undo Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Template editors 2,204,211 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books/Archive 19) (bot Next edit →
(26 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 16: Should we make articles on certain fiction novels? Please chat me at my talk page. [[User_talk:Editor028\|My talk page]]-Editor028 == ~~Good~~Best ~~article reassessment~~source for ~~[[Danny~~date of first ~~Deever]]~~publication == [[Danny Deever]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Danny Deever/1 \|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Spinixster\|<span style="color: #b22e3e; font-family: Elephant; ">Spinixster</span>]] [[User talk:Spinixster\|<span style="font-family: Franklin Gothic Medium Cond; color: #b22e3e; font-size: 10pt;">''(chat!)''</span>]] 09:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC) For the article [[Icebreaker (non-fiction book)]], I'm interested in this book: ~~== Good article reassessment for [[Power: A New Social Analysis]] ==~~ {{cite book \| last=Suvorov \| first=Viktor \| translator-first1=Madeleine \| translator-last1=Berelowitch \| translator-first2=Vladimir \| translator-last2=Berelowitch \| title=Le brise-glace \| trans-title=The icebreaker \| publisher=Olivier Orban \| isbn=978-2-85565-478-2 \| oclc=461996651 \| language=fr}} [[Power: A New Social Analysis]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Power: A New Social Analysis/1\|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:AirshipJungleman29\|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29\|talk]]) 21:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC) A [https://archive.org/details/icebreakerwhosta00suvo_0/page/n7 1990 translation/republication] says it was first published in 1988. All other sources, such as [https://www.amazon.com/dp/2855654785 Amazon], [https://search.worldcat.org/title/461996651 Worldcat], [https://books.google.com/books?id=GWQHHAAACAAJ Google Books], and [https://doi.org/10.2307/2620392 a 1990 review article] say 1989. What's most reliable? I wouldn't care for the purposes of citation, but I wonder what year should be specified in the article text itself. [[User:Daask\|Daask]] ([[User talk:Daask\|talk]]) 18:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC) ~~== Proposed move of [[Ab urbe condita (Livy)]] to [[History of Rome (Livy)]] ==~~ :@[[User:Daask\|Daask]], I'd use 1989, though there is a case for listing both (or creating a footnote that explains the discrepancy). WorldCat alone is the source most often referenced on Wikipedia for dates like this, though WorldCat can potentially miss earlier publications. A good next step would be to request a copy of the title and/or copyright pages (if they exist) to corroborate the date. I try to use reviews where possible. [https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/66/4/812/2470666 This one] uses 1989. <span style="background:#F3F3F3; color:inherit; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar\|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#871E8D'>czar</span>]]</span> 18:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC) I've posted a new page move discussion at [[Talk:Ab urbe condita (Livy)]] following new input from another editor. I tried to initiate a similar discussion a few years ago, but it didn't go anywhere. It's been a while since the last full discussion. Maybe we can achieve a new consensus. [[User:P Aculeius\|P Aculeius]] ([[User talk:P Aculeius\|talk]]) 19:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC) == FAR for The Slave Community == I have nominated [[The Slave Community]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/The Slave Community/archive1\|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?\|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\|here]].<!--Template:FARMessage--> [[User:Z1720\|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720\|talk]]) 23:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)