Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
+
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books/Archive 19) (bot
(30 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 16:
Should we make articles on certain fiction novels? Please chat me at my talk page. [[User_talk:Editor028|My talk page]]-Editor028
 
== Best source for date of first publication ==
== [[Talk:The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing#Requested move 25 October 2023]] ==
 
For the article [[Icebreaker (non-fiction book)]], I'm interested in this book:
[[File:Information.svg|40px|left]]
{{cite book | last=Suvorov | first=Viktor | translator-first1=Madeleine | translator-last1=Berelowitch | translator-first2=Vladimir | translator-last2=Berelowitch | title=Le brise-glace | trans-title=The icebreaker | publisher=Olivier Orban | isbn=978-2-85565-478-2 | oclc=461996651 | language=fr}}
An editor has requested that [[:The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing]] be moved to [[:Al-Jabr]], which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You &#32;are invited to participate in [[Talk:The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing|the move discussion]].<!-- from Template:RM notice--><span id="Remsense:1698526196642:Wikipedia_talkFTTCLNWikiProject_Books" class="FTTCmt">—&nbsp;[[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:3px 0 0 3px;padding:4px 3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:2px;color:#000">聊</span>]] 20:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)</span>
 
A [https://archive.org/details/icebreakerwhosta00suvo_0/page/n7 1990 translation/republication] says it was first published in 1988. All other sources, such as [https://www.amazon.com/dp/2855654785 Amazon], [https://search.worldcat.org/title/461996651 Worldcat], [https://books.google.com/books?id=GWQHHAAACAAJ Google Books], and [https://doi.org/10.2307/2620392 a 1990 review article] say 1989. What's most reliable? I wouldn't care for the purposes of citation, but I wonder what year should be specified in the article text itself. [[User:Daask|Daask]] ([[User talk:Daask|talk]]) 18:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
== ''Waging Peace in Vietnam'' ==
 
:@[[User:Daask|Daask]], I'd use 1989, though there is a case for listing both (or creating a footnote that explains the discrepancy). WorldCat alone is the source most often referenced on Wikipedia for dates like this, though WorldCat can potentially miss earlier publications. A good next step would be to request a copy of the title and/or copyright pages (if they exist) to corroborate the date. I try to use reviews where possible. [https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/66/4/812/2470666 This one] uses 1989. <span style="background:#F3F3F3; color:inherit; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#871E8D'>czar</span>]]</span> 18:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Could some members of BOOKS take a look at ''[[:Waging Peace in Vietnam]]''? The book itself seems like it probably meets [[:WP:NBOOK]], but the [[:Waging Peace in Vietnam#Synopsis]] section seems overly detailed and possibly some [[:WP:NOR]] and [[:WP:NOTTEXTBOOK]] issues. The beginning of [[:Waging Peace in Vietnam#Confronting the legacies of war]] has the feelings of a possible [[:WP:C-P]] violation given the "In this chapter, we hear from the Vietnamese, ...". The pronoun "we" is also used on several other occasions throughout the "Synopsis" section in similar ways which has a non-encyclopedic feel to it. -- [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 06:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 
== FAR for The Slave Community ==
== Good article reassessment for [[Danny Deever]] ==
 
[[Danny Deever]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Danny Deever/1 |reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Spinixster|<span style="color: #b22e3e; font-family: Elephant; ">Spinixster</span>]] [[User talk:Spinixster|<span style="font-family: Franklin Gothic Medium Cond; color: #b22e3e; font-size: 10pt;">''(chat!)''</span>]] 09:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated [[The Slave Community]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/The Slave Community/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].<!--Template:FARMessage--> [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 23:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)