Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 01:20, 17 October 2023 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Template editors 2,204,858 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books/Archive 19) (bot ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:33, 30 May 2024 edit undo Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Template editors 2,204,858 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books/Archive 19) (bot Next edit →
(35 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 16: Should we make articles on certain fiction novels? Please chat me at my talk page. [[User_talk:Editor028\|My talk page]]-Editor028 == ~~The~~Best ~~LDS~~source ~~church~~for ~~has~~date ~~announced~~of afirst ~~new hymnal.~~publication == For the article [[Icebreaker (non-fiction book)]], I'm interested in this book: With the current hymnal being released in [[Hymns of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (1985 book)\|1985]] and the one before that in [[Hymns: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (1948/1950)\|1948]], I'm wondering what would be needed for an article on the "next" hymnal. It was announced in 2018, but has been delayed by covid and for this hymnal, they are looking to have songs which exists in all of the most common X languages of the Church. There is coverage from both the Salt Lake Tribune (which is definitely not church affiliated) and Religionnews.com in addition to numerous sources from the LDS Church. I think this is enough for an article, but I'm not sure. (I've also asked over on WP:LDS.)[[User:Naraht\|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht\|talk]]) 13:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC) {{cite book \| last=Suvorov \| first=Viktor \| translator-first1=Madeleine \| translator-last1=Berelowitch \| translator-first2=Vladimir \| translator-last2=Berelowitch \| title=Le brise-glace \| trans-title=The icebreaker \| publisher=Olivier Orban \| isbn=978-2-85565-478-2 \| oclc=461996651 \| language=fr}} A [https://archive.org/details/icebreakerwhosta00suvo_0/page/n7 1990 translation/republication] says it was first published in 1988. All other sources, such as [https://www.amazon.com/dp/2855654785 Amazon], [https://search.worldcat.org/title/461996651 Worldcat], [https://books.google.com/books?id=GWQHHAAACAAJ Google Books], and [https://doi.org/10.2307/2620392 a 1990 review article] say 1989. What's most reliable? I wouldn't care for the purposes of citation, but I wonder what year should be specified in the article text itself. [[User:Daask\|Daask]] ([[User talk:Daask\|talk]]) 18:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC) ~~== Requested move at [[Talk:Complete Library of the Four Treasuries#Requested move 16 October 2023]] ==~~ [[File:Information.svg\|30px\|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Complete Library of the Four Treasuries#Requested move 16 October 2023]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Folly Mox\|Folly Mox]] ([[User talk:Folly Mox\|talk]]) 02:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC) :@[[User:Daask\|Daask]], I'd use 1989, though there is a case for listing both (or creating a footnote that explains the discrepancy). WorldCat alone is the source most often referenced on Wikipedia for dates like this, though WorldCat can potentially miss earlier publications. A good next step would be to request a copy of the title and/or copyright pages (if they exist) to corroborate the date. I try to use reviews where possible. [https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/66/4/812/2470666 This one] uses 1989. <span style="background:#F3F3F3; color:inherit; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar\|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#871E8D'>czar</span>]]</span> 18:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC) == FAR for The Slave Community == I have nominated [[The Slave Community]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/The Slave Community/archive1\|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?\|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\|here]].<!--Template:FARMessage--> [[User:Z1720\|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720\|talk]]) 23:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)