Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AirshipJungleman29 (talk | contribs) at 21:40, 21 December 2023 (GAR notice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 7 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Good article reassessment for Power: A New Social Analysis
WikiProject iconBooks Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Did you know

Articles for deletion

(14 more...)

Proposed deletions

Categories for discussion

Files for discussion

Good article nominees

(8 more...)

Good article reassessments

Peer reviews

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

Articles to be split

Articles for creation

(21 more...)

Fiction Books

Should we make articles on certain fiction novels? Please chat me at my talk page. My talk page-Editor028

Waging Peace in Vietnam

Could some members of BOOKS take a look at Waging Peace in Vietnam? The book itself seems like it probably meets WP:NBOOK, but the Waging Peace in Vietnam#Synopsis section seems overly detailed and possibly some WP:NOR and WP:NOTTEXTBOOK issues. The beginning of Waging Peace in Vietnam#Confronting the legacies of war has the feelings of a possible WP:C-P violation given the "In this chapter, we hear from the Vietnamese, ...". The pronoun "we" is also used on several other occasions throughout the "Synopsis" section in similar ways which has a non-encyclopedic feel to it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Danny Deever

Danny Deever has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 09:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Power: A New Social Analysis

Power: A New Social Analysis has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply