William Stukeley: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Dab link, unlinked duplicate
m hade > had
Line 149:
His idea that the druids once formed a monotheistic priesthood akin to those of modern Christians also owed an influence from older sources.{{sfn|Piggott|1985|p=103}} [[Michael Drayton]]'s 1612 poem ''[[Poly-Olbion]]'' had for instance portrayed them as wise, monotheistic sages and philosophers.{{sfn|Piggott|1985|p=103}}
 
By the time he became a cleric, he hadehad come to believe that the ancient Egyptians, [[Plato]] and the druids all accepted the existence of the Trinity.{{sfn|Piggott|1985|p=97}} By June 1730, he was claiming that Avebury was a symbolic depiction of the Trinity.{{sfn|Piggott|1985|p=104}} He believed that ancient humans had venerated the components of the cosmos, such as the heavenly bodies and the four elements, and that they recognised the numbers and musical harmonies from which the cosmos had been created.{{sfn|Hutton|2005|p=385}}
 
The idea that Britain was God's chosen nation was a recurrent idea in Stukeley's thought.{{sfn|Haycock|2002|pp=120–121}} He thought that Britons should emulate the ancient Romans.{{sfn|Haycock|2002|p=120}} Stukeley believed that God had created the Roman Empire to prepare for the arrival of Jesus and to assist in the spread of Christianity throughout Europe.{{sfn|Haycock|2002|p=119}} In this, he believed that the ancient Romans had replaced the Jews as God's [[chosen people]].{{sfn|Haycock|2002|p=120}} In his view, the Roman Empire collapsed because its inhabitants had corrupted Christianity with what he called "superstitious fopperys" and that this perverted mixture survived as the [[Roman Catholic Church]].{{sfn|Haycock|2002|p=120}} Like many English people of his time, he believed that the [[Church of England]], which had split from the Roman Catholic Church during the 16th-century [[English Reformation]], had gained special favour from God; in Stukeley's words, it represented "the main support of religion now upon the face of the earth".{{sfn|Haycock|2002|p=115}} Haycock noted that "a leading theme in Stukeley's antiquarian work" was "the resurrection of British history as an archetype for world history, and of Britain as a country historically fit to lead the world into the future".{{sfn|Haycock|2002|pp=112–113}} He criticised Britons who favoured archaeological remains encountered abroad during the Grand Tour, claiming that they were neglecting their own national heritage and adopting continental habits and vices such as effeminacy.{{sfn|Haycock|2002|p=111}}