Talk:2024 Indian general election
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2024 Indian general election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 4 days |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Restrictions placed: 4 June 2024 |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about 2024 Indian general election. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 2024 Indian general election at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 May 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
A news item involving 2024 Indian general election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 June 2024. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 10 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
It is requested that a video clip or video clips be included in this article to improve its quality. |
It is requested that one or more audio files be included in this article to improve its quality. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
Number of votes
editAlliance percentage 42.5% 40.6% Popular vote 235,973,935 136,759,064 2% difference has lead to nearly 100 million difference? India's population must be 50 billion in that case
also could TMC be included in the map under INDIA, TMC is now considering itself a member but i can understand why it might be given another colour LostCitrationHunter (talk) 14:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Kashmir candidates for NDA
editThe article says that analysts and opposition parties have claimed that the NDA alliance has not fielded any candidates because the abrogation of 370 hasn't gone well with people, however the citated BBC article only mentions one singluar analyst. The opposition has also said that they are supporting the PC and Apni Party in the elections and have called them their proxies. The article also goes on to say that the BJP workers in the Kashmir region have increased in the past few years. Further on in the article, the state BJP president has also said the same.
The two parts of the article are presented as two sides of claims, I think both of them should be included for WP:NPOV as "all the significant views" in the BBC article have not been included in the wikipedia page. Xoocit (talk) 10:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- The existing paragraph doesn't strike me as needed additional POV balance. Whats the 'other side' here? We can add a statement saying 'Despite not having a formal candidate, BJP maintains a presence in the region through their support of local parties (including PC and Apni Party)' But is that really WP:DUE in the section on BJP candidates? Schwinnspeed (talk) 16:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for participating in the discussion.
- The other side I am referring to are the statements by the opposition parties that BJP is a using proxy.
- Your statement is nice and we can include it without as it is the section of NDA candidates and not BJP candidates and the alliance has a history of supporting/getting support of non-alliance members to benefit their presence as seen with Ashwini Vaishnav's election to Rajya Sabha among other things.
- Other parties in India including those not belonging to the NDA bloc have also done similar practices such as Samajwadi Party alliance during the 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election after leaving Rampur Khas to INC and Jaswantnagar to Shivpal Singh Yadav, both of which have been covered in the list article. Xoocit (talk) 22:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thats fair, it is the NDA section, not the BJP section. I've added in the statement for WP:BALANCE to your original point and acknowledging that its a strategy used by parties even without formal candidates. I am still struggling whether its WP:DUE but probably ok Schwinnspeed (talk) 14:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! I agree that the kashmir candidate issue is gray on being WP:DUE but for WP:BALANCE the statement seems appropriate.
- It is necessary to communicate that while BJP might not be contesting, they are softening the blow of their arrival in Kashmir through the usage of newly formed parties as described by this Srinagar-based The Hindu journalist. The extensive media cover of the backing of these candidates could be similar to the backing of Kapil Sibal's election to Rajya Sabha or Jammu and Kashmir Awami Ittehad Party's backing of Engineer Rashid. In short, these additions could paint a fairer picture of the reality, without using WP:OR. Xoocit (talk) 21:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thats fair, it is the NDA section, not the BJP section. I've added in the statement for WP:BALANCE to your original point and acknowledging that its a strategy used by parties even without formal candidates. I am still struggling whether its WP:DUE but probably ok Schwinnspeed (talk) 14:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 June 2024 (2)
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the Misinformation section, please add, "The officials of the Election Commission rubbished reports that OTPs were used to hack EVMs.[1]" 2406:7400:90:92A7:4225:E90A:466A:3BB9 (talk) 08:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Your statement seems to lack context and appear to counter a fact that does not exist on the article? Xoocit (talk) 21:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Huge political slugfest over EVM 'unlocking' charge; poll officer reacts to OTP claims. Who said what? 10 points". Hindustan Times. 17 June 2024. Retrieved 17 June 2024.
- Not done: please address the raised concern before reopening the edit request. M.Bitton (talk) 22:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Most voted person in the history of humanity?
editAt 235 million votes, Modi is the most voted person in the history of humanity. That should be mentioned. SFandLogicReader (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @SFandLogicReader Do you have a Reliable Source saying so? Wikipedia articles usually do not include such claims unless they are supported by a source, otherwise it could be Original Research Soni (talk) 15:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Adding a map
editI've made a map of the results by state and union territory, could someone add it to the "Results by state and union territory" section, please? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2024-india-by-state-and-union-territory.svg MapperGuy87 (talk) 11:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nice work, you should try to find a usage for the map on the Results of the 2024 Indian general election. Cheers! Xoocit (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- I added the map to both places (this page and the Results page). Feels like a necessary summary visual on both pages. Schwinnspeed (talk) 22:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)