• Nancy Pontika, the main author of this entry, is an Open Access Aggregation Officer at the CORE project.

Requested move 29 May 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved - the request is malformed and acquired no consensus anyway. (non-admin closure) Red Slash 02:04, 17 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


COnnecting REpositoriesCORE – The project has stopped using the acronym COnnecting REpositories since ~2017. Thus we would like to change the page title to its current name, CORE. After that we will also update the content of the page, as it is outdated. I work for CORE. Nancypontika (talk) 17:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 14:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Claims to be" the world's largest aggregator

edit

Saying "claims to be the world's largest aggregator"[1][2] is bias.

I moved the statement from the beginning since it was newly added anyway and just said that they say they are the largest.[3] GBFEE (talk) 22:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@GBFEE: I wrote "claims to be" attempting to improve on "is" (since the source of the claim is CORE) without any conscious biased intent (I don't care who is largest), but I agree that your replacement "CORE says they are" is a big improvement by eliminating any bias that could be imputed by the reader, so thanks! (Should it say "CORE says it is"? I'm uncertain about that.) Biogeographist (talk) 01:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Biogeographist, no worries. I could see you were trying to reduce the prominence of a self-interest claim. The claim needs an independent source. I think you're right about using "it.[4] This use is consistent with the first sentence treating CORE that way. GBFEE (talk) 22:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 November 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 07:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


COnnecting REpositoriesCORE (research service) – or CORE (research aggregator) or CORE (service). The current article title does not seem to be used very frequently in sources or by the service itself. The current article title also has an unusual styling of capital letters within words that seems contrary to MOS:TM as an unusual styling that does not follow ordinary English formatting. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Susahnya membuka pikiran siswa terkait materi

edit

susahnya membuka pikiran siswa pada materi 114.122.208.210 (talk) 00:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

بحث عن الطلاق واسبابه

edit

الطلاف 134.35.60.239 (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The influence of technology on the language development of grade 1 research introduction

edit

The influence of technology on the language development of grade 1 research introduction 180.195.26.208 (talk) 10:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply