Talk:Jamshedji Tata
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jamshedji Tata article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Jamshedji Tata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 September 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
On 13 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Jamsetji Tata to Jamshedji Tata. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Untitled
editHmm! I'm sure that Jamshetji did not set up these projects. JRD did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alren (talk • contribs) of 13.10.04
- I agree with you, and I shall bring the contents of the article to the right perspective. --Bhadani 6 July 2005 18:02 (UTC)>/s> corossed today: --Bhadani 18:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Wikify
editThis article needs to be cleaned up, its horriblely text-book style. It needs to be more devoid of emotion and more on facts without trying to sound like its worshipping the guy
Can someone clear this page up? Is his name Jamsetji or Jamshedji
editBoth of these surnames are used interchangeably throughout the whole entry? Volatileacid (talk) 01:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- I believe it may be caused due to confusion between Jamshedjpur, the city where the iron mill was set. i believe the correct name is Jamsedji 240F:79:57A:1:E022:A35A:5F86:5653 (talk) 04:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- It's neither Jamsetji nor Jamsedji it's Jamshedji Maheep Singh24 (talk) 15:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Update or Remove the Link at Bottom of the Page
editThe link is broken for "History of Tata through images". This link needs updating, as it no longer works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.69.152.123 (talk) 19:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Legacy section
editI have drastically cut the legacy section. The whole section is unsourced and looked like a fan site. I have cut it a lot to remove irrelevancies and unsourced statements. Kingsindian (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have taken out some repetitions and made some minor condensations. The section appears extravagantly eulogistic in places.Cloptonson (talk) 21:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Nauheim or Bad Nauheim?
editThe article lists both... but they're two different places. Can anyone shed light? -- Y not? 22:47, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Concerns re: NPOV
editThis page is excessively laudatory by Wikipedia's internal standards re: neutrality.
I've read a lot of material of Indian origin that purports to be and may in fact be factually accurate but that contains substantial puffery whose tone clashes with the tone of objective detachment to which Wikipedia and other modern Western encyclopedias aspire, ...
... so perhaps the article's tone is fine according to its primary contributors, the cultural perspective from which they approach their writing, and the expectations of people who approach their reading from that same cultural perspective, ...
... but given the tone's mismatch against Wikipedia's internal standards, setting expectations and assigning offsetting/discounting weight according to those standards and those standards alone wouldn't be enough to ensure the accuracy of both the denotation and the connotation of the information that the reader eventually "takes home."
- Done I've toned down the article and addressed the tag. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Early Life
editI have removed some repetition in the early life section so it reads more clearly Ericmakesthree (talk) 04:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
The following sentence doesn't make sense. Is it just two combined?
edit"The opium trade business was mostly confined Tata made many trips abroad, mainly to England, America, Europe, China, and Japan to establish branches for his father's business." DavidFarmbrough (talk) 00:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Jamshedji Tata
editA Village of Jharkhand state in India is Jamshedpur which founder was Jamshedji Tata. Shakir436 (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- what is ur question 240F:79:57A:1:E022:A35A:5F86:5653 (talk) 04:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Why 2 date of birth is shown?
editWhy 2 date of birth is shown on his page? 27.63.163.99 (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Why 2 dob in his page?
editWhy so 2 date of birth? 18.3 1822 . And next is 18 .3 .1839 . 27.63.163.99 (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Childhood
editNothing 122.177.48.121 (talk) 14:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Ranking of TISCO
edit"Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited) is Asia's first and India's largest steel company. It became the world's fifth-largest steel company after it acquired Corus Group producing 28 million tonnes of steel annually.".
When i checked online there where many polls with widey diffrent rankings. Either this sentence is based on an unpopular poll or it needs updating(there have been at least 2-3 aquisations since then 240F:79:57A:1:916C:FF30:1C8E:B371 (talk) 03:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Article says Tata was the first businessman despite working in his father's business
editThe article explicitly states that Jamsetji Tata 'broke tradition' and became the first businessman in his family; however, his father is also listed as a businessman and the article also says that Tata worked in his father's business. Where is the error? Semmal666 (talk) 05:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 13 July 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Jamsetji Tata → Jamshedji Tata – "Jamsetji Tata" is the wrong name, and we should revert to The actual name:-"Jamshedji Tata".Maheep Singh24 (talk) 11:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)