Talk:Nazi Germany
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nazi Germany article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Nazi Germany has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 May 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
@Docd13: recently changed the image in the infobox to one which is apparently more accurate, but he forgot to include the "frameless" parameter that was previously there. As a result the infobox is far too big.
Whatever image is used, someone should add the frameless parameter back. InherentDogma (talk) 19:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done prior to request. JackTheSecond (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Wait
editIsn't it also known as the Third Reich? 2600:1700:3680:8B70:35D5:B2D7:C65:3053 (talk) 04:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, mentioned in the second sentence. — Czello (music) 07:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Succeeded by
editCurrently, the "Succeeded by" section of the infobox contains East Germany, West Germany, and Allied-occupied Austria. It also references a talk page consensus on these choices, which I have been unable to locate (I'm sure it's around, I just haven't found it). Why are East and West Germany chosen instead of Soviet occupation zone in Germany, American occupation zone in Germany, British occupation zone in Germany, and French occupation zone in Germany? If following the page's logic, then why isn't Austria included instead of Allied-occupied Austria?
If this decision was based the current options being more notable, I feel that this is a poor decision for providing factually correct information, as the occupation zones WERE the direct successors, and the page should reflect as such. East and West Germany were not created until four years after Nazi Germany ceased to exist. At the very least, if these two must be included, why not still include the occupation zone articles as well, and put the years of each entity's creation in parenthesis next to it, similar to what KGB has for preceding and succeeding agencies? Just things to consider.
Thanks, SavagePanda845 (talk) 05:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- The main previous discussions are located at Talk:Nazi Germany/Archive 11#Predecessors and successors and Talk:Nazi Germany/Archive 13#Predecessor and Successor. Searching the archives using the search term "successor" reveals there may be discussions or comments in other archives. — Diannaa (talk) 14:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Sicily pertains to Italy...
editPlease correct: "The Allies landed in Sicily in July 1943 and in Italy in September." to "The Allies landed in Sicily in July 1943 and in CONTINENTAL Italy in September." 62.211.181.80 (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. --Obenritter (talk) 16:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
The German Empire Flag should be included in the infobox.
editThe German Empire flag was the national flag of Nazi Germany from 1933-1935. But for some reason, it is not included in the infobox but the black swastika with a white disk is. CerealContainer (talk) 00:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 July 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The following line should be removed:
"In 2017, a Körber Foundation survey found that just 47 per cent of 14 to 16-year-olds in Germany knew what Auschwitz was.[467][468] The journalist Alan Posener attributed the country's "growing historical amnesia" in part to a failure by German film and television to reflect the country's history accurately.[469]"
This study has since been taken down from the Körber foundation. In the study only 502 students were interviewed, and the study is not representative. There is also nothing written about the methodology of the study. Koppebarnet (talk) 15:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not done but I have amended it to better reflect what the source actually says: the survey found that just 47 per cent of 14 to 16-year-old German students surveyed knew what Auschwitz was. — Diannaa (talk) 19:21, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
This author published a collection of short stories in 1954 called “The Nightmare”, almost all based on one fact or incident in the Third Reich. The first story is about this incident; it is named “Evidence”. I think it should be put at the end of the article, as a reference. 2A00:23EE:1518:262:7040:925A:41CF:3BB (talk) 15:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Its fiction it can't be sued as a source for a history article. Slatersteven (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- You mean "used" — Diannaa (talk) 19:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)