User talk:L235

ARBECR non-admin enforcement

I tried to edit request into WP:ENFORCEMENT your interpretation

"administrators may take enforcement actions" (not "any user")
— User:L235 07:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

, but it was not done. Note ARBECR is separate from ARBPIA. The ARBECR ambiguity would involve me after I sign up and become EC but not admin, but other areas might not require EC to edit. Me at first glance, Ymblanter in the archived thread, and 2 admins disagreed with the interpretation:

of course editors are empowered - that is, they have the authority or power - to enforce arbitration decisions
— User:Anachronist 07:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Not done. There is no ambiguity and the proposed assertion is false
— User:Malcolmxl5 22:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm splitting this from my ARCA statement because nobody responded. This talk page thread and the ER are DR, and I won't have 2 open ARCAs to avoid bludgeoning. What is your interpretation on enforcement by non-admins?

Non-admins can't enforce

Simpler but considered undesirable by the majority. My original ER at WP:ENFORCEMENT:

−

sensitive situations.

+

sensitive situations. Nothing in this section empowers editors to enforce arbitration decisions.

Non-admins can enforce

The problem is I can't find policy authorizing editors enforcing ArbCom decisions. § Policy and precedent says decisions aren't policy (unless implying wikt:read in). Being guidelines sounds wrong. § Procedures and roles only gives clerks the mandate. § Elements of a decision authorizes "administrators responsible", implied "all [uninvolved] admins" by the AE header. Only specific decisions like CT could allow non-admins by omission.

I found nothing authorizing interpreting non-admin EC editors' ARBECR enforcement as WP:NOT3RR under item "D". My ARBECR interpretation is: without only, it authorizes admins without prohibiting editors. You could file an ARCA to restore your original intent. Otherwise, if we codify consensus at WP:ENFORCEMENT, it authorizing admins is redundant. Post-codification, idk if removing misleadingness is worth an ARCA edit towards passive voice.

I'm struggling to find acceptably simple WP:ENFORCEMENT wording. "policies, guidelines and ArbCom decisions" loses parallelism. An additional sentence might be creepily undue.

Clarification

Some policy should codify whether non-admins' actions can be considered ArbCom decision enforcement in general unless specified otherwise. 142.113.140.146 (talk) 02:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Vote now to fill vacancies of the first U4C

Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Vote now to fill vacancies of the first U4C because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear all,

I am writing to you to let you know the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open now through August 10, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

In cooperation with the U4C,

RamzyM (WMF) 02:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Reminder! Vote closing soon to fill vacancies of the first U4C

Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Reminder! Vote closing soon to fill vacancies of the first U4C because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear all,

The voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is closing soon. It is open through 10 August 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. If you are eligible to vote and have not voted in this special election, it is important that you vote now.

Why should you vote? The U4C is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community input into the committee membership is critical to the success of the UCoC.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

In cooperation with the U4C,

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

Administrator changes

Isabelle Belato

• Ian.thomson
• Modussiccandi

Interface administrator changes

Izno

CheckUser changes

Barkeep49

Technical news

• Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
• Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)