Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Heuh0/Userboxes/American terrorism (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts talk
she/they
stalk 21:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Heuh0/Userboxes/American terrorism

Questionable under WP:UBCR. Previous discussion in 2022 appears to have been closed by an involved non-admin. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 04:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Same as last time. For a potentially divisive, potentially offensive to a nation, political userbox, I consider it justified by there being a related mainspace article, at United States and state terrorism. It means the topic is real and encyclopedic. The userbox declares a bias about the user on a topic that is encyclopedic. The userbox does not assert a truth or advocate for a particular outcome and so does not fail WP:NOTADVOCACY. SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. States can be freely attacked. People can't. States can.—Alalch E. 23:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SmokeyJoe. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 02:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SmokeyJoe. Bduke (talk) 02:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The nominator has nominated the talk page of the userbox, not the actual user subpage. Does the nominator want to nominate the page that four editors have said can be kept, or does the nominator have a reason why they want the talk page deleted? Robert McClenon (talk) 09:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, nope, I did a Twinkle nom on the wrong page (I assume the talk page was blank before?). It looks like it’ll be kept, which is fine. My individual interpretation of WP:UBCR is perhaps pretty strict since I think doing otherwise easily leads to arbitrariness and unnecessary controversy, but if the community thinks otherwise… RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 04:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.