Contents
- 1 April 11
- 1.1 File:BiomedRx BMET Training.jpg
- 1.2 File:Devin Lockett 5.jpg
- 1.3 File:BiomedRx Anesthesia Service Training 1.jpg
- 1.4 File:BiomedRx Inc anesthesia equipment maintenance training 2..jpg
- 1.5 File:Devin Lockett 4.jpg
- 1.6 File:Devin Lockett 1.jpg
- 1.7 File:Devin Lockett 2.jpg
- 1.8 File:John Elwell 250 SWB.jpg
- 1.9 File:War & Peace in the San Luis Valley.jpg
- 1.10 File:Park.jpg
- 1.11 File:WesGarner.png
- 1.12 File:Westmemphisportral.jpg
- 1.13 File:Venus verrucosa.jpg
- 1.14 File:Episcopal.jpg
- 1.15 File:Henlein.jpg
- 1.16 File:The-Battle-of-Glorieta-Pass.jpg
April 11
edit- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BiomedRx BMET Training.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be scanned from a printed source. Eeekster (talk) 01:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Devin Lockett 5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Copyright in exif data. Eeekster (talk) 01:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Scanned from printed source. Eeekster (talk) 01:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BiomedRx Inc anesthesia equipment maintenance training 2..jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Scanned from printed source. Eeekster (talk) 01:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Devin Lockett 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- © - 2011 Stacey Patrick Photography (see exif data) Eeekster (talk) 01:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Devin Lockett 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- © - 2011 Stacey Patrick Photography (see exif data) Eeekster (talk) 01:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Devin Lockett 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- © - 2011 Stacey Patrick Photography (see exif data) Eeekster (talk) 01:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:John Elwell 250 SWB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The wording "Cover shot for Magazine 42" suggests that this is not own work. Stefan2 (talk) 12:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator. — ξxplicit 00:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is photograph of statue. There is no FOP in the USA -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- My (the author of the picture) understanding is that buildings can not be copyrighted and that this includes sculpture that is part of the building. You can not copyright architectural sculpture in the USA. Carptrash (talk) 13:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Buildings completed before 1 December 1990 are not copyrighted, but more recent buildings are copyrighted, according to Commons:COM:FOP#United States. I'm not sure if artworks included in old buildings are in the public domain because of the building rule. In either case, the building isn't dated. If it is a recent building, it would appear not to be OK. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- My (the author of the picture) understanding is that buildings can not be copyrighted and that this includes sculpture that is part of the building. You can not copyright architectural sculpture in the USA. Carptrash (talk) 13:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like a building meant to be lived in or worked in, so it fits the copyright definition of a "building". From Commons:COM:FOP#United States "However, the U.S. federal copyright law explicitly exempts photographs of such copyrighted buildings from the copyright of the building in 17 USC 120(a). Anyone may take photographs of buildings from public places. This includes such interior public spaces as lobbies, auditoriums, etc. The photographer holds the exclusive copyright to such an image (the architect or owner of the building has no say whatsoever), and may publish the image in any way." This is the new law and applies to all buildings in the US. So it's an obvious KEEP Smallbones (talk) 17:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The building is pre-1990.Carptrash (talk) 19:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It didn't look like a building to me. I thought it was a statue. Statues are not covered under FoP. Withdrawn -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Park.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The upload by Fir0002 lacks a source. The uploads by Aboum13 and Vensatry lack both source and licence. Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WesGarner.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image has the Android logo on it, which is not free. Original image of user is the original upload. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Westmemphisportral.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphaned image is made up of multiple photos. There is no license or source for the three photos. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Venus verrucosa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The source is dead: I get a 404 warning in English and Korean. The archive indicates that all rights are reserved. Stefan2 (talk) 21:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Episcopal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Likely copyvio (see here) which {{ShadowsCommons}}. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Henlein.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- {{PD-HHOFFMANN}} file without National Archives link, so impossible to know whether it was seized by the United States or not. Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This painting is by a living artist - I posted two websites about him on the talk page. I am more used to being on the other end of this sort of discussion (see File:War & Peace in the San Luis Valley.jpg ) but perhaps someone who knows what to do should look into this. Carptrash (talk) 02:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.