User talk:عبدالرحمن4132

Welcome!

Hi عبدالرحمن4132! I noticed your contributions to Siege of Jeddah and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ActualJoe ❯❯❯ Talk 16:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Aden (1586), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

Hi عبدالرحمن4132! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Gunpowder empires‎‎ several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Gunpowder empires, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. NebY (talk) 12:11, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Article request

•Request of article capture of Fez (1549) against portugese empire. •Conquest of republic of sale •Conquest of zawiya of dila Thanks 109.161.164.97 (talk) 22:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Article request

Conquest of Mehdya (1681) Against spanish empire Thanks 109.161.164.97 (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Battle of al-Asnam

I left some notes on the talk page for you, I wanted to try and ping your name there however I really had trouble trying to copy, write it to even do that! Regards Govvy (talk) 12:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Mersivan

You should not have moved this draft article into main space; it was in no way ready as it was incomplete, violated multiple Wikipedia policies and was badly written. I've entirely replaced the text with the account of the battle from the article on the Crusade of 1101 and will be watching it carefully from now on. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Byzantine–Seljuk wars. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NebY (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Sidebar

Having self-reverted after reverting some of the sidebars that you added some article, I noticed that you are now reverting your own additions (without leaving an edit summary). Is there a reason for that? M.Bitton (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

You were right about the redundant templates; I felt they were not needed since we already have a long template. There is no need to add another one. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 15:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Fair enough. Best, M.Bitton (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Clarify sources on Battle of Al Qunfudhah (1814)

Hello, in this article I see you have abbreviated footnotes to at least two sources, but nowhere on the page do you give a full citation for those works. Please add a "Sources" section with a full WP:Citation for those works. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your reply, I'll be doing that soon. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 23:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Burshek

Selamün aleyküm bro, can you put a guard on our newly opened Battle of Burshek page? Some people change results for no reason and without resources. Keremmaarda (talk) 21:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Wa aleikim salam, I've put this page over my watchlist and I'll be checking on it for some time. I don't know if there's any volunteers for that.

One more note: you've added a casualtie number for the Ottomans which is unsourced, kindly provide a source for it. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 23:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Siege of Krujë (1466–1467)

Siege of Krujë (1466–1467) Selamün aleyküm, can you review this page for a while? I am trying to explain that Mehmed was in Macedonia during the siege and I say that he was not in the siege. But someone keeps adding Mehmed again. Keremmaarda (talk) 23:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Your recent editing history at Battle of Sangamner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — SamX [talk · contribs] 01:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — SamX [talk · contribs] 07:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)