Concordance (apportionment): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:35, 13 July 2024

Static population-monotonicity^[1]^: 147, also called concordance^[2]^: 75, says that a party with more votes should not receive a smaller apportionment of seats. Failures of concordance are often called electoral inversions.^[3]

This article about politics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

This economics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

References

^ Balinski, Michel L.; Young, H. Peyton (1982). Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-02724-9.
^ Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017), Pukelsheim, Friedrich (ed.), "Divisor Methods of Apportionment: Divide and Round", Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 71–93, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_4, ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4, retrieved 2021-09-01
^ Miller, Nicholas R. (2012), Felsenthal, Dan S.; Machover, Moshé (eds.), "Election Inversions by the U.S. Electoral College", Electoral Systems: Paradoxes, Assumptions, and Procedures, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 93–127, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_4, ISBN 978-3-642-20441-8, retrieved 2024-07-13

[:03-1] Balinski, Michel L.; Young, H. Peyton (1982). Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-02724-9.

[:42-2] Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017), Pukelsheim, Friedrich (ed.), "Divisor Methods of Apportionment: Divide and Round", Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 71–93, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_4, ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4, retrieved 2021-09-01

[3] Miller, Nicholas R. (2012), Felsenthal, Dan S.; Machover, Moshé (eds.), "Election Inversions by the U.S. Electoral College", Electoral Systems: Paradoxes, Assumptions, and Procedures, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 93–127, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_4, ISBN 978-3-642-20441-8, retrieved 2024-07-13

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+'''Static population-monotonicity<ref name=":03">{{cite book |last=Balinski |first=Michel L. |url=https://archive.org/details/fairrepresentati00bali |title=Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote |last2=Young |first2=H. Peyton |publisher=Yale University Press |year=1982 |isbn=0-300-02724-9 |location=New Haven |url-access=registration}}</ref>{{Rp|147}}''', also called '''concordance<ref name=":42">{{Citation |last=Pukelsheim |first=Friedrich |title=Divisor Methods of Apportionment: Divide and Round |date=2017 |work=Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications |pages=71–93 |editor-last=Pukelsheim |editor-first=Friedrich |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_4 |access-date=2021-09-01 |place=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_4 |isbn=978-3-319-64707-4}}</ref>{{Rp|75}}''', says that a party with more votes should not receive a smaller [[Apportionment (politics)|apportionment]] of seats. Failures of concordance are often called '''electoral inversions'''.<ref>{{Citation |last=Miller |first=Nicholas R. |title=Election Inversions by the U.S. Electoral College |date=2012 |work=Electoral Systems: Paradoxes, Assumptions, and Procedures |pages=93–127 |editor-last=Felsenthal |editor-first=Dan S. |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_4 |access-date=2024-07-13 |place=Berlin, Heidelberg |publisher=Springer |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_4 |isbn=978-3-642-20441-8 |editor2-last=Machover |editor2-first=Moshé}}</ref>
-#REDIRECT [[State-population monotonicity#weak]]
+{{Politics-stub}}{{Economics-stub}}
+== References ==
+{{Reflist}}