Jump to content

A History of US: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 1 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0
Line 40: Line 40:


==Reception==
==Reception==
The series won the James A. Michener Award in Writing from the [[National Council of the Social Studies]] in 1997 and the Parents' Choice Gold Award in 1995 for a Reference book for ages 9–12.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.www.parents-choice.org/product.cfm?product_id=9012&award=xx&from=Oxford%20University%20Press |title=A History of Us: The Story of America |publisher=Parents' Choice |work=Parents' Choice Awards |accessdate=March 13, 2011}}</ref> The series has sold millions of copies and was accepted as a textbook in several U.S. states.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2002-09-13/102441/ |title=Making Everyone Happy: The state textbook review process blends homogenized boredom |first=Michael |last=May |date=September 13, 2002 |accessdate=March 13, 2011 |newspaper=The Austin Chronicle}}</ref> [[David McCullough]], a [[Pulitzer Prize]]-winning author of history books, praised ''A History of US'' before a U.S. Senate subcommittee hearing in 2005.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_senate_hearings&docid=22-340 |title=U.S. History: Our Worst Subject? |publisher=U.S. Government Printing Office |date=June 30, 2005 |location=Washington, D.C. |accessdate=March 13, 2011}}</ref>
The series won the James A. Michener Award in Writing from the [[National Council of the Social Studies]] in 1997 and the Parents' Choice Gold Award in 1995 for a Reference book for ages 9–12.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.www.parents-choice.org/product.cfm?product_id=9012&award=xx&from=Oxford%20University%20Press |title=A History of Us: The Story of America |publisher=Parents' Choice |work=Parents' Choice Awards |accessdate=March 13, 2011 }}{{Dead link|date=September 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The series has sold millions of copies and was accepted as a textbook in several U.S. states.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2002-09-13/102441/ |title=Making Everyone Happy: The state textbook review process blends homogenized boredom |first=Michael |last=May |date=September 13, 2002 |accessdate=March 13, 2011 |newspaper=The Austin Chronicle}}</ref> [[David McCullough]], a [[Pulitzer Prize]]-winning author of history books, praised ''A History of US'' before a U.S. Senate subcommittee hearing in 2005.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_senate_hearings&docid=22-340 |title=U.S. History: Our Worst Subject? |publisher=U.S. Government Printing Office |date=June 30, 2005 |location=Washington, D.C. |accessdate=March 13, 2011}}</ref>


Although it has received positive reviews from most people, some conservative critics have alleged that the works are politically-biased.<ref>{{cite book
Although it has received positive reviews from most people, some conservative critics have alleged that the works are politically-biased.<ref>{{cite book
Line 52: Line 52:
| isbn = 0-375-41482-7 }}</ref>
| isbn = 0-375-41482-7 }}</ref>


A series of reviews in 2000–2001 in ''The Textbook Letter'', a publication of the Textbook League, criticized various aspects of the first two books of ''A History of US''. In a review of volume 2, ''Making Thirteen Colonies: 1600–1740'', Alice Whealey noted many claims regarding the [[history of Western civilization]] as erroneous, focusing on [[republicanism]], [[Moorish Spain]], and [[Abrahamic religions|Abrahamic religious]] stories presented as fact.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.textbookleague.org/121hakm.htm |title=Joy Hakim Should Not Write About the History of Europe |first=Alice |last=Whealey |volume=12 |issue=1 |journal=The Textbook Letter}}</ref> Also regarding volume 2, Earl Hautala wrote that Hakim's inclusion of the [[Bible]] stories of [[Abraham]] and [[Moses]] is unjustified and incorrect from both a Biblical and a non-Biblical perspective.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.textbookleague.org/111hakm.htm |title=Textbook-Writers Promote Religious Tales as "History" |journal=The Textbook Letter |first=Earl |last=Hautala |volume=11 |issue=1 |date=March–April 2000}}</ref> William J. Bennetta argued that volume 1, ''The First Americans: Prehistory–1600'', presented a politicized [[multicultural]] view of early history.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.textbookleague.org/111joy.htm |title=Multi-Culti Joy |first=William J. |last=Bennetta |journal=The Textbook Letter |volume=11 |issue=1 |date=March–April 2000}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.textbookleague.org/113hak.htm |title=More Hokum from Hakim |first=William J. |last=Bennetta |journal=The Textbook Letter |volume=11 |issue=3 |date=July–August 2000}}</ref>
A series of reviews in 2000–2001 in ''The Textbook Letter'', a publication of the Textbook League, criticized various aspects of the first two books of ''A History of US''. In a review of volume 2, ''Making Thirteen Colonies: 1600–1740'', Alice Whealey noted many claims regarding the [[history of Western civilization]] as erroneous, focusing on [[republicanism]], [[Moorish Spain]], and [[Abrahamic religions|Abrahamic religious]] stories presented as fact.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.textbookleague.org/121hakm.htm |title=Joy Hakim Should Not Write About the History of Europe |first=Alice |last=Whealey |volume=12 |issue=1 |journal=The Textbook Letter |access-date=2008-04-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150118082606/http://www.textbookleague.org/121hakm.htm |archive-date=2015-01-18 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Also regarding volume 2, Earl Hautala wrote that Hakim's inclusion of the [[Bible]] stories of [[Abraham]] and [[Moses]] is unjustified and incorrect from both a Biblical and a non-Biblical perspective.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.textbookleague.org/111hakm.htm |title=Textbook-Writers Promote Religious Tales as "History" |journal=The Textbook Letter |first=Earl |last=Hautala |volume=11 |issue=1 |date=March–April 2000}}</ref> William J. Bennetta argued that volume 1, ''The First Americans: Prehistory–1600'', presented a politicized [[multicultural]] view of early history.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.textbookleague.org/111joy.htm |title=Multi-Culti Joy |first=William J. |last=Bennetta |journal=The Textbook Letter |volume=11 |issue=1 |date=March–April 2000}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.textbookleague.org/113hak.htm |title=More Hokum from Hakim |first=William J. |last=Bennetta |journal=The Textbook Letter |volume=11 |issue=3 |date=July–August 2000}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 15:15, 14 September 2019

A History of US
AuthorJoy Hakim
SubjectUnited States History
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication date
1995 (1st ed.)

A History of US is a ten-volume (and one sourcebook) historical book series for children, written by Joy Hakim and first published in its entirety in 1995. The series is published by the US branch of Oxford University Press and is currently in its third edition. Originally conceived as a trade children's series, the books quickly found fans among classroom teachers; in response to the prompting of educators Oxford University Press developed ancillary teaching materials to accompany the series. Branded as 'alternatives to traditional textbooks' the series is regularly used in both public and private schools, usually in middle school classes. The books are all written in a personal tone, as if the author were a storyteller. The texts have been released to ample praise by teachers, home-schoolers, students, and many others. The series has won the James A. Michener Award in Writing and the Parent's Choice Gold Award.

Content

The books are titled:

  1. The First Americans: Prehistory–1600
  2. Making Thirteen Colonies: 1600–1740
  3. From Colonies to Country: 1735–1791
  4. The New Nation: 1789–1850
  5. Liberty for All? 1820–1860
  6. War, Terrible War: 1855–1865
  7. Reconstructing America: 1865–1890
  8. An Age of Extremes: 1880–1917
  9. War, Peace, And All That Jazz: 1918–1945
  10. All the People: Since 1945

37 " Lost: A Colony


The eleventh volume is a sourcebook and index, containing full text of the primary sources—usually government documents, speeches, or famous writings—referenced throughout the series and words.

Reception

The series won the James A. Michener Award in Writing from the National Council of the Social Studies in 1997 and the Parents' Choice Gold Award in 1995 for a Reference book for ages 9–12.[1] The series has sold millions of copies and was accepted as a textbook in several U.S. states.[2] David McCullough, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author of history books, praised A History of US before a U.S. Senate subcommittee hearing in 2005.[3]

Although it has received positive reviews from most people, some conservative critics have alleged that the works are politically-biased.[4]

A series of reviews in 2000–2001 in The Textbook Letter, a publication of the Textbook League, criticized various aspects of the first two books of A History of US. In a review of volume 2, Making Thirteen Colonies: 1600–1740, Alice Whealey noted many claims regarding the history of Western civilization as erroneous, focusing on republicanism, Moorish Spain, and Abrahamic religious stories presented as fact.[5] Also regarding volume 2, Earl Hautala wrote that Hakim's inclusion of the Bible stories of Abraham and Moses is unjustified and incorrect from both a Biblical and a non-Biblical perspective.[6] William J. Bennetta argued that volume 1, The First Americans: Prehistory–1600, presented a politicized multicultural view of early history.[7][8]

References

  1. ^ "A History of Us: The Story of America". Parents' Choice Awards. Parents' Choice. Retrieved March 13, 2011.[permanent dead link]
  2. ^ May, Michael (September 13, 2002). "Making Everyone Happy: The state textbook review process blends homogenized boredom". The Austin Chronicle. Retrieved March 13, 2011.
  3. ^ "U.S. History: Our Worst Subject?". Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. June 30, 2005. Retrieved March 13, 2011.
  4. ^ Ravitch, Diane (2003). The Language Police. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. pp. 100–104. ISBN 0-375-41482-7.
  5. ^ Whealey, Alice. "Joy Hakim Should Not Write About the History of Europe". The Textbook Letter. 12 (1). Archived from the original on 2015-01-18. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
  6. ^ Hautala, Earl (March–April 2000). "Textbook-Writers Promote Religious Tales as "History"". The Textbook Letter. 11 (1).
  7. ^ Bennetta, William J. (March–April 2000). "Multi-Culti Joy". The Textbook Letter. 11 (1).
  8. ^ Bennetta, William J. (July–August 2000). "More Hokum from Hakim". The Textbook Letter. 11 (3).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_History_of_US&oldid=915658423"