Jay Sekulow

Jay Sekulow
File:JaySekulowOffice.jpg ACLU Attorney Jay Sekulow in July 2007
Born	Jay Alan Sekulow 6 (1956) (age 68) Brooklyn, New York, U.S.
Education	B.A. Mercer University (law) J.D, Mercer University (law) Ph.D., Regent University (legal history)
Occupation	Civil Attorney (ACLU)
Years active	1978-present
Spouse(s)	Pamela, 1978-present
Children	Jordan and Logan

Jay Alan Sekulow (born June 10, 1956 in Brooklyn, New York) is an American attorney and radio talkshow host. He currently serves as Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), a conservative religious organization founded by evangelist Pat Robertson to oppose the American Civil Liberties Union, as well as serving as Chief Counsel of the European Centre for Law and Justice.

Education

Sekulow graduated cum laude from Mercer University, receiving both a bachelor's degree and a doctor of jurisprudence while serving as an editorial staff member of the Mercer Law Review. He also received a Ph.D. from Regent University, authoring his dissertation on the subject of American Legal History.

Career

As a young lawyer, Sekulow worked in the Office of Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service as a tax trial attorney, bringing suit in the United States Tax Court on behalf of the United States Department of Treasury.

In 1990, Sekulow became the director of The American Center for Law and Justice. In addition to his duties as Chief Counsel for the ACLJ, Sekulow hosts Jay Sekulow Live!, a syndicated daily radio program that airs on nearly 850 stations nationwide, broadcast on terrestrial radio, as well as XM and Sirius. This live call-in program focuses on legal and legislative battles currently underway across America, occasionally featuring in-studio guests such as Jackie Mason and Chuck Colson. He is also the host of ACLJ This Week, a weekly television news program broadcast on TBN.

Sekulow is speculated to have been one of the "Four Horsemen" who "engineered" the nomination of Chief Justice John G. Roberts to the Supreme Court.

In 2007, Sekulow endorsed Mitt Romney's presidential campaign.

Cases before the Supreme Court

Sekulow has argued in front of the United States Supreme Court multiple times throughout his career. Beginning in 1987 with a case involving Jews for Jesus and their clash with Los Angeles International Airport’s policy against free speech, Sekulow has focused on religious liberty cases before the court. He has specialized in arguing key issues of the First Amendment, arguing with opponents such as current Chief Justice John Roberts, the Deputy Solicitor General at the time.

Case:	Date:	Argument:	Result:
Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus	1987	Arguing on behalf of Jews for Jesus, Sekulow argued that LAX’s policy banning all “First Amendment activities” violated the organization’s right to free speech.	Judgment for Jews for Jesus.
Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens	1990	Sekulow argued on behalf of students who were denied their request to form a Bible and Prayer club at their school.	Judgment for the Students.
U.S. v. Kokinda.	1990	Sekulow argued on behalf of two volunteers of the National Democratic Policy Committee who were arrested after refusing to leave the sidewalk near a post office.	Judgment for the United States
Lee v. ISKCON	1992	Sekulow served as co-counsel, arguing on behalf of ISKCON against a regulation that prohibited distribution of literature in airport terminals.	Judgment for the International Society for Krishna Consciousness.
Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic	1993	Sekulow argued on behalf of anti-abortion activists who were originally found as violating a statute by conducting demonstrations at abortion clinics.	Judgment for the Activists.
Lamb’s Chapel v. Center Moriches School District	1993	In another case involving use of school property, Sekulow represented Lamb’s Chapel, and their right to show religious-oriented films in a school after-hours.	Judgment for the Church.
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York	1997	Sekulow argued on behalf of Schenck, challenging a District court ruling that provided for speech-free floating “bubble zones” surrounding abortion clinics.	Judgment for Schenck.
Hill v. Colorado	2000	This case revolved around protesters’ rights to distribute literature in front of abortion clinics and a statute that barred them from approaching a non-consenting person. Sekulow, representing the protesters, argued that Colorado's “eight foot rule” was unconstitutional.	Judgment for Colorado.
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe	2000	Sekulow, representing the school district, argued that prayer, initiated and led by students at football games, did not violate the Establishment Clause.	Judgment for Doe.
McConnell v. FEC	2003	In a highly publicized case, Sekulow, on behalf of a group of students including Emily Echols, argued that a portion of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 violated the First Amendment and was thus unconstitutional.	Judgment for Echols, et al.
Locke v. Davey	2003	Sekulow, representing student Joshua Davey, argued that a statute excluding theology students from publicly funded scholarships was unconstitutional.	Judgment for Locke.
Pleasant Grove City v. Summum	2008	Sekulow, representing the city of Pleasant Grove, challenged a Tenth Circuit opinion allowing Summum to erect a monument alongside a Ten Commandments monument donated to the city by the Fraternal Order of Eagles.	Judgment for Pleasant Grove City.

In addition to his work as a Supreme Court advocate, Sekulow, as lead counsel of the ACLJ, has submitted several amicus briefs in support of conservative issues. He has submitted amicus briefs in landmark cases such as Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Rasul v. Bush, Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood, and Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation. His amicus briefs for Van Orden v. Perry and Wisconsin Right to Life v. FEC were cited by Justices John Paul Stevens and John Roberts respectively. Sekulow served as counsel to Robert and Mary Schindler during the controversy surrounding their daughter, Terri Schiavo. While he is widely acknowledged as a member of the Christian Right, Sekulow’s amicus brief in Morse v. Frederick was in support of the ACLU’s position; he argued that schools banning “offensive” speech would also be able to prohibit religious speech with which the administrators disagree.

Sekulow again argued before the Supreme Court on November 12, 2008 in Pleasant Grove City v Summum, case No.07-665. Sekulow represented the City in this case concerning government control over monuments and memorials in government-owned public places. On Feb. 24th the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the City's favor. On March 2, 2009, the Supreme Court issued a summary disposition in the companion case of Summum v Duchesne City. The Court was again unanimous, vacating the 10th Circuit opinion and remanding the case for an opinion consistent with Pleasant Grove City v Summum.

Awards and Accomplishments

Jay Sekulow lecturing in 2006

Sekulow has been honored numerous times throughout his career. In 1994, he was named to the National Law Journal’s Power List, which highlights some of the most prolific attorneys in America. In 1997, he was named to the American Lawyer’s Public Sector 45, a list dedicated to legal public servants who have made the most impact in their respective fields. Following this accolade, the National Law Journal placed Dr. Sekulow in their highly coveted 100 Most Influential Lawyers in America list. Most recently, Legal Times profiled him as one of the 90 Greatest Washington Lawyers of the Last 30 years, solidifying his place as one of the most renowned legal professionals in the United States today.

Criticism

In November 2005 Legal Times published an article in which it was alleged that Sekulow "through the ACLJ and a string of interconnected nonprofit and for-profit entities, has built a financial empire that generates millions of dollars a year and supports a lavish lifestyle -- complete with multiple homes, chauffeur-driven cars, and a private jet that he once used to ferry Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia." The article quotes a number of former donors and supporters (none of whom were identified by name) who claim that Sekulow has engaged in a pattern of self-dealing to finance his "high-flying lifestyle." The article reviewed hundreds of pages of financial, real estate and tax filings, outlining the corporate structure of the ACLJ and other closely held for-profit companies founded by Sekulow including CASE, PGMS, Regency and the similarly-named Center for Law and Justice, a for-profit law firm owned by Sekulow and two other ACLJ executives.

According to a ranking by the American Institute of Philanthropy, a charity watchdog group, Sekulow is the 13th-highest-paid executive of a charitable organization in the United States if the given figure for his salary is accurate.

Personal

Sekulow and his wife Pamela, who have been married since 1978, have two adult sons, Jordan Sekulow, a political campaign consultant, and Logan Sekulow, the host of the Christian variety show, The Logan Show.

Sekulow was raised Jewish, but converted to Christianity in college and now considers himself a Messianic Jew.

Sekulow also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees for The Supreme Court Historical Society in Washington, DC. "

Publications

• Jay Sekulow, Witnessing Their Faith: Religious Influence on Supreme Court Justices and Their Opinions, Rowman & Littlefield (2005).
• Jay Sekulow, The Christian, The Court, and The Constitution, The American Center for Law and Justice (2000).
• Jay Sekulow, Christian Rights in the Workplace, The American Center for Law and Justice (1997).
• Jay Sekulow, Knowing Your Rights: Taking Back Our Religious Liberties (1993).
• Jay Sekulow, And Nothing But the Truth (1996).
• Jay Sekulow, From Intimidation to Victory, Creation House (1990).

External links

• American Center for Law & Justice Bio
• "The Secrets of Jay Sekulow" Legal Times November 1, 2005
• Oyez Profile