Jefferson–Hemings controversy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Mholowchak (talk | contribs) m I've added much research that was excluded |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Historically, in the 1850s Jefferson's eldest grandson, [[Thomas Jefferson Randolph]], told historian Henry Randall that the late [[Peter Carr (Virginia politician)|Peter Carr]], a married nephew of Jefferson's (the son of his sister), had fathered Hemings' children; Randolph asked Randall to refrain from addressing the issue in his biography. Randall passed on this information to James Parton, another historian. Parton published the Carr story, and major historians of Jefferson generally asserted the denial of Jefferson's paternity for nearly 150 years.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Looney|first1=J. Jefferson|title=Peter Carr (1770–1815)|url=http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Carr_Peter_1770-1815|publisher=[[Encyclopedia Virginia]]|accessdate=13 July 2015}}</ref> |
Historically, in the 1850s Jefferson's eldest grandson, [[Thomas Jefferson Randolph]], told historian Henry Randall that the late [[Peter Carr (Virginia politician)|Peter Carr]], a married nephew of Jefferson's (the son of his sister), had fathered Hemings' children; Randolph asked Randall to refrain from addressing the issue in his biography. Randall passed on this information to James Parton, another historian. Parton published the Carr story, and major historians of Jefferson generally asserted the denial of Jefferson's paternity for nearly 150 years.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Looney|first1=J. Jefferson|title=Peter Carr (1770–1815)|url=http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Carr_Peter_1770-1815|publisher=[[Encyclopedia Virginia]]|accessdate=13 July 2015}}</ref> |
||
While some historians and others challenged the denial, a changed consensus did not emerge until after a [[Y chromosome]] DNA analysis done in 1998. The DNA study showed a match between a descendant of the Jefferson male line and a descendant of [[Eston Hemings]], Sally's youngest son. It showed no match between the Carr line and the Hemings descendant, |
While some historians and others challenged the denial, a changed consensus did not emerge until after a [[Y chromosome]] DNA analysis done in 1998. The DNA study showed a match between a descendant of the Jefferson male line, a descendant of Field Jefferson, and a descendant of [[Eston Hemings]], Sally's youngest son. It showed no match between the Carr line and the Hemings descendant, and no match between the Jefferson line and Thomas Woodson descendants. |
||
In 2000, a consensus emerged among historians that the |
In 2000, a rough consensus, generated by the DNA study somewhat misleadingly titled "Jefferson Fathered Slaves' Last Child," emerged among historians. The argument put forth was that the DNA evidence, consistent with Jefferson being the father of Eston Hemings, plus the historical evidence favors Jefferson's paternity for all of Hemings' children.<ref name="PBS">[https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jefferson/true/ ''Jefferson's Blood''], PBS Frontline, 2000, accessed March 10, 2012. Quote: "Now, the new scientific evidence has been correlated with the existing documentary record, and a consensus of historians and other experts who have examined the issue agree that the question has largely been answered: Thomas Jefferson fathered at least one of Sally Hemings' children, and quite probably all six."</ref> The [[Monticello]] Foundation commissioned its own study, which in 2001 concluded Jefferson was likely the father of Eston Hemings and the other children. Since then the organization has reflected this change in its exhibits, as well as publications about Jefferson and his times. The revelations have stimulated works by a variety of scholars, who have used the rough consensus as a basis for studies into Jefferson, the Hemings family, and interracial American society. In June, 2018, Thomas Jefferson Foundation, with introduction of the new exhibit on Sally Hemings, asserted that the relationship is now known to be fact.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.monticello.org/site/blog-and-community/monticello-affirms-thomas-jefferson-fathered-children-sally-hemings|title=Monticello Affirms Thomas Jefferson Fathered Children with Sally Hemings|last=|first=|date=|website=monticello|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=12/16/2018}}</ref> |
||
The findings of the DNA team and Monticello's Foundation have been challenged by many scholars. In 2001, a team of scholars, independent of Monticello, formed to study the evidence for Jefferson's paternity. Harvey Mansfield (Harvard), Forrest McDonald (Alabama), David Mayer (Capital), Lance Banning (Kentucky), Robert Turner (Virginia), James Ceaser (Virginia), Robert Ferrell (Indiana), Jean Yarbrough (Bowdoin), Alf Mapp (Old Dominion), Walter Williams (George Mason), Thomas Traut (North Carolina), Paul Rahe (Tulsa) and Charlese Kesler (Clermont McKenna) studied the available, relevant evidence and stated, "It is our unanimous view that the allegation is by no means proven. … Our individual conclusions range from serious skepticism about the charge to a conviction that it is almost certainly untrue."<ref>{{Cite book|title=Report of the Scholars Commision|last=Turner|first=Robert|publisher=Carolina Academic Press|year=2001|isbn=|location=|pages=18}}</ref> Historian Cynthia Burton in ''Jefferson Vindicated'' argues that much of the historical consensus is driven by "rhetoric and style," not objectivity and regard for truth.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Jefferson Vindicated|last=Burton|first=Cynthia|publisher=Cynthia H. Burton|year=2001|isbn=|location=|pages=4}}</ref> Lawyer William Hyland argues persuasively that none of the arguments on behalf of Jefferson' paternity would implicate Jefferson in a court of law.<ref>{{Cite book|title=In Defense of Thomas Jefferson|last=Hyland|first=William|publisher=Thomas Dunne Books|year=2009|isbn=|location=|pages=}}</ref> Finally, philosopher M. Andrew Holowchak, in ''Framing a Legend: Uncovering the Distorted History of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings,'' offers a penetrating analysis of the arguments for paternity.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Framing a Legend|last=Holowchak|first=M. Andrew|publisher=Prometheus|year=2013|isbn=|location=Amherst, NY|pages=}}</ref> He maintains that those arguments are uncogent and that the extant relevant evident points to anti-paternity. Elsewhere, he examines the 10 arguments listed on Monticello's webpage that show Jefferson's paternity to be fact. He states:<blockquote>Examination of those 10 arguments shows plainly that not one of the arguments is sufficiently cogent to show Jefferson’s paternity and that some of the arguments are laughably weak. What however if they are taken together? One cannot add several weak arguments and come up with a strong argument. Imagine, via analogy, seven cups of weak lavender tea. Imagine next that one pours the contents of the seven cups into a large bowl in some effort to come up with a strong tea. That, of course, does not work. Weak tea mixed with weak tea makes weak tea. It is similar with weak arguments.</blockquote>He concludes that one cannot just add up scraps of evidence, consistent with a liaison, to come up with one large, cogent argument.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b3271d071069936fe4db185/t/5c16a3d88985833d5f45212d/1544987608444/Swamping.pdf|title=The Swamping Rhetoric of the Thomas Jefferson Foundation|last=Holowchak|first=M. Andrew|date=|website=Thomas Jefferson, Sage|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=12/16/2018}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Smithsonian Institution]] and [[Monticello]] collaborated in a "groundbreaking" 2012 exhibit held in Washington, DC: ''Slavery at Jefferson's Monticello: The Paradox of Liberty.''<ref name="trescott"/> It was the first to treat Jefferson or any American president in the role of slaveholder, as well as the first to present the lives of enslaved families. The exhibit traced the lives of six major enslaved families at Monticello and noted the consensus on Jefferson's paternity of Hemings' children. A minority of historians continues to suggest another Jefferson male as a more likely paternal candidate{{citation needed|date=February 2017}}. In 2008 Gordon-Reed published ''The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family,'' fully exploring the complicated Jefferson-Hemings family and relationships with his first family. |
|||
==Background== |
==Background== |
||
Jefferson became a widower at age 39 in 1782 |
Jefferson became a widower at age 39 in 1782. He never remarried and died in 1826. Sally Hemings was his much younger slave and a perhaps half-sister of his wife. She accompanied his daughter Maria to France, where some maintain they started a sexual relationship, and returned with him to Monticello. She bore her first recorded child soon after. |
||
⚫ | Four of Hemings' children survived to adulthood. In the [[antebellum period]], hers would have been called a "shadow family".<ref>{{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Jan|title=Sally Hemings & Thomas Jefferson: History, Memory, and Civic Culture|page=14}}</ref> Sally Hemings was also the child of a shadow family. Some historians believe her father to be [[John Wayles]], Jefferson's father-in-law, who as a widower had a 12-year liaison with his [[mulatto]] slave [[Betty Hemings]] and fathered six children with her, but we do not know. These children had three-quarters European, one-quarter African ancestry, and were, the story goes, half-siblings to Jefferson's wife [[Martha Wayles Skelton Jefferson]].<ref>{{cite web|title=John Wayles|url=http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/john-wayles|website=monticello.org|accessdate=September 23, 2014}}</ref> [[Sally Hemings]] is the youngest child of this shadow family.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gordon-Reed|title=The Hemings of Monticello|page=80}}</ref> [[Issac Jefferson]] described Sally as "mighty near white ... very handsome, long straight hair down her back."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/thomas-jefferson-s-enslaved-mistress-sally-hemings-living-quarters-found-n771261|title=Historians uncover slave quarters of Sally Hemings at Thomas Jefferson's Monticello|author=|date=|website=nbcnews.com|accessdate=July 12, 2017}}</ref> |
||
<blockquote>Through his celebrity as the eloquent spokesman for liberty and equality as well as the ancestor of people living on both sides of the color line, Jefferson has left a unique legacy for descendants of Monticello's enslaved people as well as for all Americans.<ref>[http://www2.monticello.org/gettingword/legacy.html "The Legacies of Monticello"], ''Getting Word'', Monticello, accessed March 19, 2011</ref></blockquote> |
|||
⚫ | Four of Hemings' children survived to adulthood. In the [[antebellum period]], hers would have been called a "shadow family".<ref>{{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Jan|title=Sally Hemings & Thomas Jefferson: History, Memory, and Civic Culture|page=14}}</ref> Sally Hemings was also the child of a shadow family |
||
Of the four Hemings children who survived to adulthood: William Beverley, [[Harriet Hemings|Harriet]], [[Madison Hemings|Madison]] and [[Eston Hemings]]—all but Madison Hemings eventually identified as white and lived as adults in white communities. Under the Virginia law of ''[[partus sequitur ventrem]],'' because Sally Hemings was a slave, her children were also born enslaved. But the children were seven-eighths European, one-eighth African by ancestry. If free, they would have been considered legally white in Virginia of the time.<ref name="Kolchin17">Kolchin, Peter ''American Slavery, 1619–1877'', New York: Hill and Wang, 1993, p. 17</ref><ref name="Banks">[http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/52/ Taunya Lovell Banks, "Dangerous Woman: Elizabeth Key's Freedom Suit -Subjecthood and Racialized Identity in Seventeenth Century Colonial Virginia"], 41 ''Akron Law Review'' 799 (2008), Digital Commons Law, University of Maryland Law School, accessed Apr 21, 2009</ref> |
Of the four Hemings children who survived to adulthood: William Beverley, [[Harriet Hemings|Harriet]], [[Madison Hemings|Madison]] and [[Eston Hemings]]—all but Madison Hemings eventually identified as white and lived as adults in white communities. Under the Virginia law of ''[[partus sequitur ventrem]],'' because Sally Hemings was a slave, her children were also born enslaved. But the children were seven-eighths European, one-eighth African by ancestry. If free, they would have been considered legally white in Virginia of the time.<ref name="Kolchin17">Kolchin, Peter ''American Slavery, 1619–1877'', New York: Hill and Wang, 1993, p. 17</ref><ref name="Banks">[http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/52/ Taunya Lovell Banks, "Dangerous Woman: Elizabeth Key's Freedom Suit -Subjecthood and Racialized Identity in Seventeenth Century Colonial Virginia"], 41 ''Akron Law Review'' 799 (2008), Digital Commons Law, University of Maryland Law School, accessed Apr 21, 2009</ref> |
||
Line 47: | Line 45: | ||
===Early claims=== |
===Early claims=== |
||
[[File:Cock ca1804 attrib to JamesAkin AmericanAntiquarianSociety.png|thumb|right|Caricature of [[Thomas Jefferson]] and [[Sally Hemings]], ca.1804, attributed to [[James Akin (artist)|James Akin]] (American Antiquarian Society)]] |
[[File:Cock ca1804 attrib to JamesAkin AmericanAntiquarianSociety.png|thumb|right|Caricature of [[Thomas Jefferson]] and [[Sally Hemings]], ca.1804, attributed to [[James Akin (artist)|James Akin]] (American Antiquarian Society)]] |
||
In 1802 the journalist [[James T. Callender]], after being refused an appointment to a Postmaster position by Jefferson and issuing veiled threats of "consequences |
In 1802 the journalist [[James T. Callender]], after being refused an appointment to a Postmaster position by Jefferson and issuing veiled threats of "consequences," reported that Jefferson had fathered several children with a slave [[concubine]] named Sally. His family denied the allegation. Others privately or publicly made the claim.<ref>Annette Gordon-Reed, ''[[The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family]]'', New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2008, pp. 555, 616–17</ref> Elijah Fletcher, the headmaster of the New Glasgow Academy ([[Amherst County, Virginia]]) visited Jefferson in 1811 and wrote in his diary: |
||
{{quote|The story of black Sal is no farce—That he cohabits with her and has a number of children by her is a sacred truth—and the worst of it is he keeps the same children slaves—an unnatural crime which is very common in these parts.<ref>{{cite book|last=Ed. Thos. Jefferson Loony|title="Elijah Flecther's Account of a Visit to Monticello" May 8, 1811|year=2006|publisher=Princeton|location=Thos. Jefferson Papers, Retirement Series, Vol. 3|page=610|display-authors=etal}}</ref>}} |
{{quote|The story of black Sal is no farce—That he cohabits with her and has a number of children by her is a sacred truth—and the worst of it is he keeps the same children slaves—an unnatural crime which is very common in these parts.<ref>{{cite book|last=Ed. Thos. Jefferson Loony|title="Elijah Flecther's Account of a Visit to Monticello" May 8, 1811|year=2006|publisher=Princeton|location=Thos. Jefferson Papers, Retirement Series, Vol. 3|page=610|display-authors=etal}}</ref>}} |
||
Line 69: | Line 67: | ||
On July 7, 1870, [[Chillicothe, Ohio]] census taker William Weaver noted in his official census book beside the entry for "Hemmings, Madison", recording "This man is the son of Thomas Jefferson."<ref name="madisoncensus">{{cite web|url=http://blog.encyclopediavirginia.org/files/2012/11/1870UnitedStatesFederalCensus.jpg|title=1870 census page|author=|date=|website=encyclopediavirginia.org|accessdate=July 12, 2017}}</ref> |
On July 7, 1870, [[Chillicothe, Ohio]] census taker William Weaver noted in his official census book beside the entry for "Hemmings, Madison", recording "This man is the son of Thomas Jefferson."<ref name="madisoncensus">{{cite web|url=http://blog.encyclopediavirginia.org/files/2012/11/1870UnitedStatesFederalCensus.jpg|title=1870 census page|author=|date=|website=encyclopediavirginia.org|accessdate=July 12, 2017}}</ref> |
||
In 1873, the issue received renewed, widespread attention after publication of an interview with [[Madison Hemings]], who asserted that Jefferson was his father. He was interviewed about his life as a slave at Monticello, and his account was published in an Ohio newspaper. Then age 68, Hemings claimed Jefferson as his and his siblings' father. He said that when Jefferson and Sally Hemings were still in Paris, she became pregnant with his child. Based on Jefferson's promise to free her children when they came of age, she returned with him to the United States from France, where slavery had been banned.<ref name="madisonstatement">[https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jefferson/cron/1873march.html ''The Memoirs of Madison Hemings''], Thomas Jefferson: ''Frontline'', PBS-WGBH</ref> [[Israel Jefferson]], also a former slave of Monticello, confirmed the account of Jefferson's paternity of Hemings' children in his own interview published that year by the same Ohio newspaper.<ref>{{cite web|title=The memoirs of Israel Jefferson|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jefferson/cron/1873israel.html|publisher=pbs.org|accessdate=September 23, 2014}}</ref> Critics attacked the newspaper account as politically motivated and the former slaves as mistaken, or worse.<ref name="attacks">{{cite news|last1=Gordon-Reed|first1=Annette|title='Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy'|url=http://www.cnn.com/books/beginnings/9903/thomas.jefferson/|accessdate=September 25, 2014|publisher=cnn|date=March 3, 1999}}</ref> |
In 1873, the issue received renewed, widespread attention after publication of an interview with [[Madison Hemings]], who asserted that Jefferson was his father. He was interviewed about his life as a slave at Monticello, and his account was published in an Ohio newspaper. Then age 68, Hemings claimed Jefferson as his and his siblings' father. He said that when Jefferson and Sally Hemings were still in Paris, she became pregnant with his child. Based on Jefferson's promise to free her children when they came of age, she returned with him to the United States from France, where slavery had been banned.<ref name="madisonstatement">[https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jefferson/cron/1873march.html ''The Memoirs of Madison Hemings''], Thomas Jefferson: ''Frontline'', PBS-WGBH</ref> [[Israel Jefferson]], also a former slave of Monticello, confirmed the account of Jefferson's paternity of Hemings' children in his own interview published that year by the same Ohio newspaper.<ref>{{cite web|title=The memoirs of Israel Jefferson|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jefferson/cron/1873israel.html|publisher=pbs.org|accessdate=September 23, 2014}}</ref> Critics attacked the newspaper account as politically motivated and the former slaves as mistaken, or worse.<ref name="attacks">{{cite news|last1=Gordon-Reed|first1=Annette|title='Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy'|url=http://www.cnn.com/books/beginnings/9903/thomas.jefferson/|accessdate=September 25, 2014|publisher=cnn|date=March 3, 1999}}</ref> Holowchak maintains that there are serious flaws with the "interview," and that we are in no position to take his testimony as factual.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/160131|title=If Jefferson Had an Affair with Sally Hemings, We Have to Believe the Account Written by Her Son, but Should We?|last=Holowchak|first=M. Andrew|date=|website=History News Network|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=12/16/2018}}</ref> |
||
In 1874, James Parton published his biography of Jefferson, in which he attributed the content of Hemings' memoir to the political motives of a journalist who interviewed him. He and other critics essentially discounted Hemings' memoir, while attributing to him a range of negative motives for telling his story. |
In 1874, James Parton published his biography of Jefferson, in which he attributed the content of Hemings' memoir to the political motives of a journalist who interviewed him. He and other critics essentially discounted Hemings' memoir, while attributing to him a range of negative motives for telling his story. In his work, Parton repeated the Jefferson family's oral history about a Carr paternity and the claim that Jefferson was absent during the conception period of one of Hemings' children.<ref>Gordon-Reed, ''American Controversy,'' pp. 24, 81</ref><ref>Allison, Andrew, K. DeLynn Cook, M. Richard Maxfield, W. Cleon Skousen, ''The Real Thomas Jefferson'', pp. 232–33, National Center for Constitutional Studies, Washington, D.C.</ref> |
||
===Modern historians=== |
===Modern historians=== |
||
Line 84: | Line 82: | ||
In 1961, historian Pearl M. Graham published an article in the ''[[Journal of Negro History]]'' on Jefferson and Hemings. It was based on material from the ''Farm Books,'' as well as a detailed timeline of Jefferson's activities developed by historian [[Dumas Malone]] in his extensive biography. This was published in several volumes beginning in the 1940s. Graham noted that Hemings conceived her children only when Jefferson was in residence at Monticello, during a time when he traveled frequently and was away for lengthy periods. Graham also provided biographical information on Sally's children; she supported accounts that Hemings and Jefferson had several children together.<ref>Graham, Pearl M. "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings," ''[[Journal of Negro History]]'' 46, Vol. XLIX, No. 2 (April 1961): 89–103.</ref> |
In 1961, historian Pearl M. Graham published an article in the ''[[Journal of Negro History]]'' on Jefferson and Hemings. It was based on material from the ''Farm Books,'' as well as a detailed timeline of Jefferson's activities developed by historian [[Dumas Malone]] in his extensive biography. This was published in several volumes beginning in the 1940s. Graham noted that Hemings conceived her children only when Jefferson was in residence at Monticello, during a time when he traveled frequently and was away for lengthy periods. Graham also provided biographical information on Sally's children; she supported accounts that Hemings and Jefferson had several children together.<ref>Graham, Pearl M. "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings," ''[[Journal of Negro History]]'' 46, Vol. XLIX, No. 2 (April 1961): 89–103.</ref> |
||
In 1972, [[Fawn M. Brodie]] |
In 1972, [[Fawn M. Brodie]] published "The Great Jefferson Taboo" in ''[[American Heritage (magazine)|American Heritage]]'' magazine. She addressed the rumors of Jefferson's relationship with Sally Hemings, his [[quadroon]] slave, conducted extensive research, and concluded that they had a long relationship.<ref name="brodie"/> Anticipating "inevitable controversy", the magazine broke with its usual practice and published Brodie's extensive footnotes for her article.<ref name="brodie">Brodie, Fawn D., ''[http://www.americanheritage.com/content/great-jefferson-taboo?page=show The Great Jefferson Taboo],'' ''American Heritage'' Magazine, June 1972, Volume 23.</ref><ref>PBS.org, ''Frontline'', "[https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jefferson/cron/ The History of a Secret]."</ref> She published the article prior to her full biography of Jefferson, titled ''Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History'' (1974).<ref>{{cite news|title=A popular but controversial biography|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jefferson/cron/1974brodie.html|accessdate=September 25, 2014|publisher=pbs.org}}</ref> The article reached a wide public through this general interest magazine, and Brodie's biography became a bestseller. |
||
Holowchak, who devotes chapter 1 of ''Framing a Legend'' to critical analysis of Brodie's psychoanalytic arguments for Jefferson's affair with Hemings, has this to say about Brodie's motivation for her book.<blockquote>Key events and disappointments in her life—her strongly Mormon upbringing which she later disavowed, a strained relationship with her father of whom Brodie acknowledges Jefferson reminds her, castigation by an undisclosed member of the family for her religious apostasy and her loss of two children in childbirth said to be by that castigator punishment for it, her mother’s three attempts at suicide (one, by mutilating herself with a crucifix, and the last, successful, by setting herself on fire), and discovery of her husband’s extramarital affair—strongly suggest that the task of linking Jefferson to Hemings might have been a bit of revenge against her father and her husband, that is, masking her own hurt and feelings of inadequacy through projection.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thomasjeffersonsage.com/essays|title=Fawn Brodie Gets Intimate|last=Holowchak|first=M. Andrew|date=|website=Thomas Jefferson, Sage|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=12/14/2018}}</ref></blockquote> |
|||
==Evidence == |
==Evidence == |
||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
In 1968 the historian [[Winthrop Jordan]] said that Jefferson was at Monticello "nine months prior to each birth" of Hemings' children, during a 13-year period when he was often away for months at a time. He acknowledged that the relationship was possible.<ref>Winthrop Jordan, ''White over Black: American Attitudes Toward the Negro, 1550–1812'', Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1968.</ref> Fawn Brodie also used this information in her biography of Jefferson, which contributed to her conclusion that he had fathered Hemings' children.<ref name="Brodie">Fawn McKay Brodie, ''Thomas Jefferson, An Intimate History'' (1974).</ref> The source for the birth dates of the children is Jefferson's Farm Book.<ref name="appleby">Appleby, Joyce Oldham and Arthur Schlesinger. ''Thomas Jefferson''. New York: Macmillan, 2003, pp. 75–77.</ref> |
In 1968 the historian [[Winthrop Jordan]] said that Jefferson was at Monticello "nine months prior to each birth" of Hemings' children, during a 13-year period when he was often away for months at a time. He acknowledged that the relationship was possible.<ref>Winthrop Jordan, ''White over Black: American Attitudes Toward the Negro, 1550–1812'', Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1968.</ref> Fawn Brodie also used this information in her biography of Jefferson, which contributed to her conclusion that he had fathered Hemings' children.<ref name="Brodie">Fawn McKay Brodie, ''Thomas Jefferson, An Intimate History'' (1974).</ref> The source for the birth dates of the children is Jefferson's Farm Book.<ref name="appleby">Appleby, Joyce Oldham and Arthur Schlesinger. ''Thomas Jefferson''. New York: Macmillan, 2003, pp. 75–77.</ref> |
||
In 2000, a statistical analysis of the conception data and Jefferson's residencies concluded it was 99 percent likely that he was the father of her children, and that there was only a 1 percent chance that he was not the father of all her children. This analysis, commonly referred to as a [[Monte Carlo method|Monte Carlo simulation]], was done by the head of archaeology at Monticello.<ref name="Neiman">[https://www.jstor.org/stable/2674366 Fraser D. Neiman, "No Access Coincidence or Causal Connection? The Relationship between Thomas Jefferson's Visits to Monticello and Sally Hemings's Conceptions"], ''William and Mary Quarterly'', January 2000, pp. 198–210, accessed January 12, 2012</ref><ref name="Stanton">[https://books.google.com/books?id=nar3c4veUf8C&pg=PA102&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false Lucia C. Stanton, "Elizabeth Hemings and Her Family"], ''Free Some Day: The African American Families of Monticello'', University of North Carolina Press, 2000, p. 117, accessed August 13, 2011.</ref> In 2001, the Scholars Commission Report of the Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society criticized the study, as they said Neiman had not accounted for the possibility of multiple fathers.<ref>Robert F. Turner, ''The Jefferson Hemings Controversy: Report of the Scholars Commission'', Carolina Academic Press, 2011, p. 126</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tjscience.org/|title=Sally Hemings, Thomas Jefferson, and the Authority of Science|author=|date=|website=www.tjscience.org|accessdate=July 12, 2017}}</ref> Before their report, in the previous 180 years historians had made no suggestion that Hemings had more than one partner for her children. |
In 2000, a statistical analysis of the conception data and Jefferson's residencies concluded it was 99 percent likely that he was the father of her children, and that there was only a 1 percent chance that he was not the father of all her children. This analysis, commonly referred to as a [[Monte Carlo method|Monte Carlo simulation]], was done by the head of archaeology at Monticello.<ref name="Neiman">[https://www.jstor.org/stable/2674366 Fraser D. Neiman, "No Access Coincidence or Causal Connection? The Relationship between Thomas Jefferson's Visits to Monticello and Sally Hemings's Conceptions"], ''William and Mary Quarterly'', January 2000, pp. 198–210, accessed January 12, 2012</ref><ref name="Stanton">[https://books.google.com/books?id=nar3c4veUf8C&pg=PA102&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false Lucia C. Stanton, "Elizabeth Hemings and Her Family"], ''Free Some Day: The African American Families of Monticello'', University of North Carolina Press, 2000, p. 117, accessed August 13, 2011.</ref> In 2001, the Scholars Commission Report of the Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society criticized the study, as they said Neiman had not accounted for the possibility of multiple fathers.<ref>Robert F. Turner, ''The Jefferson Hemings Controversy: Report of the Scholars Commission'', Carolina Academic Press, 2011, p. 126</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tjscience.org/|title=Sally Hemings, Thomas Jefferson, and the Authority of Science|author=|date=|website=www.tjscience.org|accessdate=July 12, 2017}}</ref> Before their report, in the previous 180 years historians had made no suggestion that Hemings had more than one partner for her children. More recently, Holowchak argues that the argument is "scandalously fallacious." He adds: "Statistical arguments are only as good as the data that go into them. When you contaminate the data, even slightly, by selectively culling data that will secure the sought-out conclusion and by ignoring relevant evidence that creates difficulties for the thesis, then the results can become massively skewed—hence, the 0.99 percent probability that Jefferson fathered all of Sally Hemings’ children."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b3271d071069936fe4db185/t/5b37b05c70a6ad2e8aa8d3bb/1530376285254/12%29+Neimann.pdf|title=Neiman’s Nemocracy: A “Proof” Gone Bad in the Jefferson Paternity Issue|last=Holowchak|first=M. Andrew|date=|website=Thomas Jefferson, Sage|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=12/16/2018}}</ref> |
||
The Hemings children were named for people in the Randolph-Jefferson family or who were important to Jefferson, rather than for people in the Hemings family. When mixed-race children were sired by the master, they were frequently named after people from his family.<ref name="Annette Gordon-Reed 1997 pp. 210-223">Annette Gordon-Reed (1997), ''American Controversy'', pp. 210–23</ref> Jefferson gave the Hemings family special treatment: the three boys while young had very light household duties. At working age, they were each apprenticed to the master carpenter of the estate, the most skilled artisan, who was also their uncle. This would provide them with skills to make a good living as free adults.<ref name="Annette Gordon-Reed 1997 pp. 210-223"/> |
The Hemings children were named for people in the Randolph-Jefferson family or who were important to Jefferson, rather than for people in the Hemings family. When mixed-race children were sired by the master, they were frequently named after people from his family.<ref name="Annette Gordon-Reed 1997 pp. 210-223">Annette Gordon-Reed (1997), ''American Controversy'', pp. 210–23</ref> Jefferson gave the Hemings family special treatment: the three boys while young had very light household duties. At working age, they were each apprenticed to the master carpenter of the estate, the most skilled artisan, who was also their uncle. This would provide them with skills to make a good living as free adults.<ref name="Annette Gordon-Reed 1997 pp. 210-223"/> |
||
According to Annette Gordon-Reed, Thomas Jefferson's treatment of Sally Hemings children is a good indication that he could have |
According to Annette Gordon-Reed, Thomas Jefferson's treatment of Sally Hemings children is a good indication that he could have fathered the children. Harriet Hemings did not begin working as a weaver until she was fourteen years old.<ref>Gordon-Reed, ''An American Controversy'', p. 218</ref> Many of Jefferson's slaves would have started at ten. Another example is that unlike other slaves, Madison Hemings stated that until they were put to work, they would run errands with Sally. This was very uncommon. |
||
Most importantly, Gordon-Reed notes that Jefferson freed all the Hemings children. Theirs was the only slave family to all go free from Monticello; they were the only slaves freed in their youth and as they came of age, and Harriet Hemings was the only female slave he ever freed.<ref name="monticello.org">[http://www.monticello.org/site/plantation-and-slavery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-brief-account "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account"], Monticello, accessed March 4, 2011</ref> He allowed Beverley (male) and Harriet to "escape" in 1822 at ages 23 and 21, although Jefferson was already struggling financially and would be $100,000 (US${{formatnum:{{Inflation|US|100,000|1826}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) in debt at his death.<ref name="Annette Gordon-Reed 1997 pp. 210-223"/> He gave his overseer money to give to Harriet for her journey. Jefferson avoided publicity this way, but the gentry at the time noted the Hemingses' absences; Monticello overseer Edmund Bacon noted in his memoir (published after Jefferson's death) that people were talking about Harriet's departure, saying that she was Jefferson's daughter.<ref name="monticello.org"/><ref>Gordon-Reed, ''American Controversy,'' p. 34</ref> |
Most importantly, Gordon-Reed notes that Jefferson freed all the Hemings children. Theirs was the only slave family to all go free from Monticello; they were the only slaves freed in their youth and as they came of age, and Harriet Hemings was the only female slave he ever freed.<ref name="monticello.org">[http://www.monticello.org/site/plantation-and-slavery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-brief-account "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account"], Monticello, accessed March 4, 2011</ref> He allowed Beverley (male) and Harriet to "escape" in 1822 at ages 23 and 21, although Jefferson was already struggling financially and would be $100,000 (US${{formatnum:{{Inflation|US|100,000|1826}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) in debt at his death.<ref name="Annette Gordon-Reed 1997 pp. 210-223"/> He gave his overseer money to give to Harriet for her journey. Jefferson avoided publicity this way, but the gentry at the time noted the Hemingses' absences; Monticello overseer Edmund Bacon noted in his memoir (published after Jefferson's death) that people were talking about Harriet's departure, saying that she was Jefferson's daughter.<ref name="monticello.org"/><ref>Gordon-Reed, ''American Controversy,'' p. 34</ref> |
||
In his 1826 will, Jefferson freed the younger brothers Madison and Eston Hemings, who were approaching the age of 21. To enable them to stay in Virginia, Jefferson's will petitioned the legislature for permission for them to stay in the state with their families. (Such legislative approval was required by laws related to manumission and free blacks.) Jefferson also freed three older males from the extended [[Elizabeth Hemings]] family; they had each served him for decades. His will also requested that they be allowed to stay in the state.<ref>Gordon-Reed, ''An American Controversy'', pp. 38–43</ref> Jefferson's daughter Martha Randolph gave Sally Hemings "her time" after Jefferson's death, an informal freedom, and the former slave lived with her two younger sons, Madison and Eston, in nearby [[Charlottesville, Virginia|Charlottesville]] for nearly a decade before her death.<ref name="monticello.org"/> |
In his 1826 will, Jefferson freed the younger brothers Madison and Eston Hemings, who were approaching the age of 21. To enable them to stay in Virginia, Jefferson's will petitioned the legislature for permission for them to stay in the state with their families. (Such legislative approval was required by laws related to manumission and free blacks.) Jefferson also freed three older males from the extended [[Elizabeth Hemings]] family; they had each served him for decades. His will also requested that they be allowed to stay in the state.<ref>Gordon-Reed, ''An American Controversy'', pp. 38–43</ref> Jefferson's daughter Martha Randolph gave Sally Hemings "her time" after Jefferson's death, an informal freedom, and the former slave lived with her two younger sons, Madison and Eston, in nearby [[Charlottesville, Virginia|Charlottesville]] for nearly a decade before her death. |
||
<ref name="monticello.org" /> |
|||
Those are some of the arguments listed on Monticello's website, which now maintains Jefferson definitely fathered all of Hemings' children. Holowchak, who subjects all those arguments to critical analysis in "The Politics of Race at Monticello," maintains none is convincing and that one cannot merely add together many unconvincing arguments to come up with an airtight argument pro-paternity.<blockquote>We cannot group together 10 arguments each of which shows little and get one large argument that inescapably indicts Jefferson. If that were the case, then the more insubstantial arguments we should amass, the tighter would be the case for Jefferson’s paternity. Yet anti-paternity adherents could do the same, and then we would have an airtight argument pro-paternity ''and'' an airtight argument anti-paternity, but that is absurd. In logic, many weak arguments do not amount to a good one.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Thomas Jefferson, Race, and Slavery|last=Holowchak|first=M. Andrew|publisher=Forthcoming|year=|isbn=|location=|pages=chapter 8}}</ref></blockquote> |
|||
==1998 DNA study== |
==1998 DNA study== |
||
Line 111: | Line 115: | ||
==Historical consensus== |
==Historical consensus== |
||
With the Carr nephews disproved and a match for the Eston Hemings descendant found with the Jefferson male line, formerly skeptical biographers, such as [[Joseph Ellis]] and Andrew Burstein, publicly said they had changed their opinions and concluded that Jefferson had fathered Hemings' children.<ref name=autogenerated2>[http://hnn.us/articles/13102.html Richard Shenkman, "The Unknown Jefferson: An Interview with Andrew Burstein"], ''History News Network'', July 25, 2005, accessed March 14, 2011.</ref><ref name="OnlineLegacy">[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/white_house/july-dec98/jefferson_11-2.html "Thomas Jefferson's Legacy"], ''Online Newshour'', PBS, November 2, 1998, accessdate August 4, 2006</ref> As Burstein said in 2005, |
With the Carr nephews disproved and a match for the Eston Hemings descendant found with the Jefferson male line, formerly skeptical biographers, such as [[Joseph Ellis]] and Andrew Burstein, publicly said they had changed their opinions and concluded that Jefferson had fathered Hemings' children.<ref name=autogenerated2>[http://hnn.us/articles/13102.html Richard Shenkman, "The Unknown Jefferson: An Interview with Andrew Burstein"], ''History News Network'', July 25, 2005, accessed March 14, 2011.</ref><ref name="OnlineLegacy">[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/white_house/july-dec98/jefferson_11-2.html "Thomas Jefferson's Legacy"], ''Online Newshour'', PBS, November 2, 1998, accessdate August 4, 2006</ref> As Burstein said in 2005,<blockquote>[T]he white Jefferson descendants who established the family denial in the mid-nineteenth century cast responsibility for paternity on two Jefferson nephews (children of Jefferson's sister) whose DNA was not a match. So, as far as can be reconstructed, there are no Jeffersons other than the president who had the degree of physical access to Sally Hemings that he did.<ref name="autogenerated2" /></blockquote>In 2000, the [[Thomas Jefferson Foundation]], which operates Monticello, issued a report of its own investigation, which concluded by accepting Jefferson's paternity.<ref name="Study" /> Dr. [[Daniel P. Jordan]], president of Monticello, committed at the time to incorporate "the conclusions of the report into Monticello's training, interpretation, and publications." This included new articles and monographs on the Hemings descendants reflecting the new evidence, as well as books on the interracial communities of Monticello and Charlottesville. New exhibits at Monticello show Jefferson as the father of the Sally Hemings children.<ref name="Study">[http://www.monticello.org/site/plantation-and-slavery/vi-conclusions "Conclusions"], ''Report of the Research Committee on Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings'', Monticello, January 2000, accessed March 9, 2011. Quote: The DNA study, combined with multiple strands of currently available documentary and statistical evidence, indicates a high probability that Thomas Jefferson fathered Eston Hemings, and that he most likely was the father of all six of Sally Hemings's children appearing in Jefferson's records. Those children are Harriet, who died in infancy; Beverly; an unnamed daughter who died in infancy; Harriet; Madison; and Eston."</ref><ref>[http://www2.monticello.org/gettingword/ancestors.html "Extraordinary Ancestors"], ''Getting Word'', Monticello, accessed March 19, 2011</ref> In 2010, the Monticello website noted the new consensus that has emerged on Jefferson's paternity of Hemings' children in the decade since those major studies.<ref name="Brief">{{cite web|title=Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account|url=http://www.monticello.org/site/plantation-and-slavery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-brief-account|work=Monticello|publisher=Thomas Jefferson Foundation|accessdate=November 4, 2011}}</ref> |
||
<blockquote>[T]he white Jefferson descendants who established the family denial in the mid-nineteenth century cast responsibility for paternity on two Jefferson nephews (children of Jefferson's sister) whose DNA was not a match. So, as far as can be reconstructed, there are no Jeffersons other than the president who had the degree of physical access to Sally Hemings that he did.<ref name=autogenerated2 /></blockquote> |
|||
In 2000, the [[Thomas Jefferson Foundation]], which operates Monticello, issued a report of its own investigation, which concluded by accepting Jefferson's paternity.<ref name="Study"/> Dr. [[Daniel P. Jordan]], president of Monticello, committed at the time to incorporate "the conclusions of the report into Monticello's training, interpretation, and publications." This included new articles and monographs on the Hemings descendants reflecting the new evidence, as well as books on the interracial communities of Monticello and Charlottesville. New exhibits at Monticello show Jefferson as the father of the Sally Hemings children.<ref name="Study">[http://www.monticello.org/site/plantation-and-slavery/vi-conclusions "Conclusions"], ''Report of the Research Committee on Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings'', Monticello, January 2000, accessed March 9, 2011. Quote: The DNA study, combined with multiple strands of currently available documentary and statistical evidence, indicates a high probability that Thomas Jefferson fathered Eston Hemings, and that he most likely was the father of all six of Sally Hemings's children appearing in Jefferson's records. Those children are Harriet, who died in infancy; Beverly; an unnamed daughter who died in infancy; Harriet; Madison; and Eston."</ref><ref>[http://www2.monticello.org/gettingword/ancestors.html "Extraordinary Ancestors"], ''Getting Word'', Monticello, accessed March 19, 2011</ref> In 2010, the Monticello website noted the new consensus that has emerged on Jefferson's paternity of Hemings' children in the decade since those major studies.<ref name="Brief">{{cite web|title=Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account|url=http://www.monticello.org/site/plantation-and-slavery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-brief-account|work=Monticello|publisher=Thomas Jefferson Foundation|accessdate=November 4, 2011}}</ref> |
|||
In its January 2000 issue, the ''[[William and Mary Quarterly]]'' published ''Forum: Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings Redux,'' a total of seven articles noting the changed consensus and the developing new views on Jefferson.<ref>[https://www.jstor.org/stable/i326101 ''Forum: Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings Redux''], accessed January 11, 2012</ref> One article had the results of an analysis by Fraser D. Neiman, who studied the statistical significance of the relationship between Jefferson's documented residencies at Monticello and Hemings' conceptions.<ref name="Neiman"/> He concluded that there was a 99 percent chance that Jefferson was the father of Hemings' children.<ref name="Neiman"/> |
In its January 2000 issue, the ''[[William and Mary Quarterly]]'' published ''Forum: Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings Redux,'' a total of seven articles noting the changed consensus and the developing new views on Jefferson.<ref>[https://www.jstor.org/stable/i326101 ''Forum: Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings Redux''], accessed January 11, 2012</ref> One article had the results of an analysis by Fraser D. Neiman, who studied the statistical significance of the relationship between Jefferson's documented residencies at Monticello and Hemings' conceptions.<ref name="Neiman"/> He concluded that there was a 99 percent chance that Jefferson was the father of Hemings' children.<ref name="Neiman"/> |
||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
In the fall of 2001, articles in the ''National Genealogical Society Quarterly'' criticized the TJHS Scholars Commission Report for poor scholarship and failure to follow accepted historical practices of analysis, or to give sufficient weight to the body of evidence.<ref name="Leary"/> In the same year, historian Alexander Boulton wrote that Randolph Jefferson had never been seriously proposed as a candidate by historians before the 1998 DNA study. He noted "previous testimony had agreed" that Hemings had only one father for her children, and criticized the idea that she had multiple partners for her children.<ref name="wm">[http://oieahc.wm.edu/wmq/Oct01/boulton.pdf Alexander Boulton, "The Monticello Mystery-Case Continued": reviews of ''The Jefferson-Hemings Myth: An American Travesty''; ''A President in the Family: Thomas Jefferson, Sally Hemings and Thomas Woodson''; and ''Free Some Day: African American Families at Monticello''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110720115728/http://oieahc.wm.edu/wmq/Oct01/boulton.pdf |date=July 20, 2011 }}; in ''William & Mary Quarterly'', Third Series, Vol. 58, No. 4, October 2001. Quote: "Past defenses of Jefferson having proven inadequate, the TJHS advocates have pieced together an alternative case that preserves the conclusions of earlier champions but introduces new "evidence" to support them. Randolph Jefferson, for example, had never seriously been considered as a possible partner of Sally Hemings until the late 20th century, when DNA evidence indicated that a Jefferson was unquestionably the father of Eston."</ref> Jeanette Daniels, Marietta Glauser, Diana Harvey and Carol Hubbell Ouellette conducted research and in 2003 concluded that Randolph Jefferson had been an infrequent visitor to Monticello.<ref name = "genealogy_edu">[http://www.genealogy.edu/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?id=3543 Jeanette K. B. Daniels, AG, CGRS, Marietta Glauser, Diana Harvey, and Carol Hubbell Ouellette, "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings, A Look at Some Original Documents"], ''Heritage Quest Magazine'', May/June 2003</ref> |
In the fall of 2001, articles in the ''National Genealogical Society Quarterly'' criticized the TJHS Scholars Commission Report for poor scholarship and failure to follow accepted historical practices of analysis, or to give sufficient weight to the body of evidence.<ref name="Leary"/> In the same year, historian Alexander Boulton wrote that Randolph Jefferson had never been seriously proposed as a candidate by historians before the 1998 DNA study. He noted "previous testimony had agreed" that Hemings had only one father for her children, and criticized the idea that she had multiple partners for her children.<ref name="wm">[http://oieahc.wm.edu/wmq/Oct01/boulton.pdf Alexander Boulton, "The Monticello Mystery-Case Continued": reviews of ''The Jefferson-Hemings Myth: An American Travesty''; ''A President in the Family: Thomas Jefferson, Sally Hemings and Thomas Woodson''; and ''Free Some Day: African American Families at Monticello''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110720115728/http://oieahc.wm.edu/wmq/Oct01/boulton.pdf |date=July 20, 2011 }}; in ''William & Mary Quarterly'', Third Series, Vol. 58, No. 4, October 2001. Quote: "Past defenses of Jefferson having proven inadequate, the TJHS advocates have pieced together an alternative case that preserves the conclusions of earlier champions but introduces new "evidence" to support them. Randolph Jefferson, for example, had never seriously been considered as a possible partner of Sally Hemings until the late 20th century, when DNA evidence indicated that a Jefferson was unquestionably the father of Eston."</ref> Jeanette Daniels, Marietta Glauser, Diana Harvey and Carol Hubbell Ouellette conducted research and in 2003 concluded that Randolph Jefferson had been an infrequent visitor to Monticello.<ref name = "genealogy_edu">[http://www.genealogy.edu/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?id=3543 Jeanette K. B. Daniels, AG, CGRS, Marietta Glauser, Diana Harvey, and Carol Hubbell Ouellette, "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings, A Look at Some Original Documents"], ''Heritage Quest Magazine'', May/June 2003</ref> |
||
Philosopher M. Andrew Holowchak is a stentorian critic of advocates of pro-paternity. In numerous publications, he asserts that we are in no position to assert anything other than this: We do not know.<blockquote>The situation at Monticello is toxic. They are unwilling to aim to settle the issues of Jefferson’s paternity and of his avowed racism by rational debate concerning the evidence, or even concerning what ought to count as evidence. Members of TJF—and many of them are, I suspect, sufficiently unfamiliar with Jefferson to be judges of the issue of paternity—have elected themselves to be the sole arbiters of Thomas Jefferson’s legacy, which is no longer open to debate.</blockquote>Holowchak maintains that the Foundation is phasing out Jefferson and focusing on race and Sally Hemings at the expense of Jefferson's life and legacy.<blockquote>While it is laudable that members of the TJF wish to be viewed historically as paladins of human rights, they are doing so by constructing an image of Jefferson that is warped by political ideals. Their Jefferson is an opportunist, hypocrite, racist, and perhaps even rapist, and ''they do not give voice to scholars who disagree''. The climate is authoritarian—certainly not in keeping with Jefferson’s republican thinking.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/170713|title=Is Monticello Monetizing Race at Jefferson’s Expense?|last=Holowchak|first=M. Andrew|date=|website=History News Network|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=12/16/2018}}</ref></blockquote> |
|||
===Monticello Association=== |
===Monticello Association=== |
||
In 1999, [[Lucian Truscott IV]], a Wayles-Jefferson descendant and member of the Monticello Association, the Jefferson lineage society, invited Hemings' descendants to that year's annual meeting.<ref name="Lucian">[http://www.americanheritage.com/content/children-monticello Lucian K. Truscott IV, "Children Of Monticello"], ''American Heritage'', February/March 2001| Volume 52, Issue 1, accessed April 19, 2012</ref> |
In 1999, [[Lucian Truscott IV]], a Wayles-Jefferson descendant and member of the Monticello Association, the Jefferson lineage society, invited Hemings' descendants to that year's annual meeting.<ref name="Lucian">[http://www.americanheritage.com/content/children-monticello Lucian K. Truscott IV, "Children Of Monticello"], ''American Heritage'', February/March 2001| Volume 52, Issue 1, accessed April 19, 2012</ref> The Association decided to commission its own report to determine whether it would admit Hemings' descendants to the lineage society (termed the MAC report or Membership Advisory Committee Report). The report was to determine whether the Hemings descendants could satisfy the society's requirements for documentation of lineage. The 2002 report to the Monticello Association concluded the evidence was insufficient to establish Jefferson's paternity. The majority of members voted against admitting the Hemings descendants as members of the group.<ref>{{cite news|title=Jefferson Heirs Plan Cemetery for Slave's Kin|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/21/us/jefferson-heirs-plan-cemetery-for-slave-s-kin.html|accessdate=September 25, 2014|publisher=The New York Times|date=April 21, 2002}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Taylor|first1=Kate|title=Did Thomas Jefferson Father a Child With Sally Hemings?|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2002/05/did_thomas_jefferson_father_a_child_with_sally_hemings.html|accessdate=September 25, 2014|publisher=Slte.com|date=May 8, 2002}}</ref> |
||
Truscott noted in ''[[American Heritage (magazine)|American Heritage]]'' magazine that the Association had not had such strict documentation standards before the DNA study results were published in 1998. He checked the previous membership rules and found the following: |
Truscott noted in ''[[American Heritage (magazine)|American Heritage]]'' magazine that the Association had not had such strict documentation standards before the DNA study results were published in 1998. He checked the previous membership rules and found the following: |
||
Line 164: | Line 166: | ||
William G. Hyland, Jr., a trial lawyer, published ''In Defense of Thomas Jefferson: The Sally Hemings Sex Scandal'' (2009), in which he argues that Jefferson's younger brother Randolph, who had a reputation for socializing with the Monticello slaves (in contrast to Thomas, who, Hyland argues, did not) is the most likely of several possible candidates for the father of Sally Hemings' children. He repeats the poor reputation of James Callendar, who had first reported allegations of Jefferson's relationship with a slave.<ref>William G. Hyland, Jr., ''In Defense of Thomas Jefferson: The Sally Hemings Sex Scandal,'' [http://www.openisbn.com/isbn/0312561008/ Introduction], Thomas Dunne Books, June 2009, accessed January 19, 2013</ref> |
William G. Hyland, Jr., a trial lawyer, published ''In Defense of Thomas Jefferson: The Sally Hemings Sex Scandal'' (2009), in which he argues that Jefferson's younger brother Randolph, who had a reputation for socializing with the Monticello slaves (in contrast to Thomas, who, Hyland argues, did not) is the most likely of several possible candidates for the father of Sally Hemings' children. He repeats the poor reputation of James Callendar, who had first reported allegations of Jefferson's relationship with a slave.<ref>William G. Hyland, Jr., ''In Defense of Thomas Jefferson: The Sally Hemings Sex Scandal,'' [http://www.openisbn.com/isbn/0312561008/ Introduction], Thomas Dunne Books, June 2009, accessed January 19, 2013</ref> |
||
In 2012, the [[Smithsonian Institution]] and Monticello collaborated on a major exhibit held at the [[National Museum of American History]], ''Slavery at Jefferson's Monticello: The Paradox of Liberty'' (January–October 2012). Described as a "groundbreaking exhibit |
In 2012, the [[Smithsonian Institution]] and Monticello collaborated on a major exhibit held at the [[National Museum of American History]], ''Slavery at Jefferson's Monticello: The Paradox of Liberty'' (January–October 2012). Described as a "groundbreaking exhibit," it was the first on the national Mall to address Jefferson as slaveholder and the family lives of slaves at Monticello.<ref name="trescott">[https://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/exhibits/slavery-at-jeffersons-monticello-paradox-of-liberty,1222311/critic-review.html Jacqueline Trescott, "Slavery at Jefferson's Monticello: The Paradox of Liberty"], ''Washington Post'', January 27, 2012, accessed April 21, 2012</ref> Members and descendants of six families, including the Hemings, were documented and the strength of the enslaved families was shown. The exhibit also noted that "evidence strongly support[s] the conclusion that Jefferson was the father of Sally Hemings' children."<ref name=AmHist>[http://americanhistory.si.edu/exhibitions/exhibition.cfm?key=38&exkey=1669 ''Slavery at Jefferson's Monticello: The Paradox of Liberty''], January 27, 2012 – October 14, 2012, Smithsonian Institution, accessed March 23, 2012. Quote: "The [DNA] test results show a genetic link between the Jefferson and Hemings descendants: A man with the Jefferson Y chromosome fathered Eston Hemings (born 1808). While there were other adult males with the Jefferson Y chromosome living in Virginia at that time, most historians now believe that the documentary and genetic evidence, considered together, strongly support the conclusion that Jefferson was the father of Sally Hemings's children."</ref> More than one million visitors saw the exhibit. Following the Washington run, the exhibit toured the US, being held at museums in [[Atlanta]], [[St. Louis]] and other venues. Both the [[United States National Park Service]] and the University of Virginia's [[Miller Center of Public Affairs]] note in their online biographies that Jefferson's paternity of Hemings' children has been widely accepted.<ref>{{cite web|title=Thomas Jefferson|url=http://www.nps.gov/jeff/historyculture/thomas-jefferson.htm|work=Jefferson National Expansion Memorial|publisher=National Park Service|accessdate=May 2, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Thomas Jefferson|url=http://millercenter.org/academic/americanpresident/jefferson/essays/biography/1|work=American President A Reference Resource|publisher=Miller Center – University of Virginia|accessdate=May 2, 2012|page=1|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120505114527/http://millercenter.org/academic/americanpresident/jefferson/essays/biography/1|archivedate=May 5, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
||
==Representation in other media== |
==Representation in other media== |
Revision as of 20:12, 16 December 2018
Thomas Jefferson | |
---|---|
3rd President of the United States | |
In office March 4, 1801 – March 4, 1809 | |
Vice President | Aaron Burr George Clinton |
Preceded by | John Adams |
Succeeded by | James Madison |
Personal details | |
Born | Shadwell, Colony of Virginia | April 13, 1743
Died | July 4, 1826 Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S. | (aged 83)
Political party | Democratic-Republican |
The Jefferson–Hemings controversy is a historical debate over whether a sexual relationship between U.S. President Thomas Jefferson and his slave, Sally Hemings resulted in his fathering some or all of her six recorded children. For more than 150 years, most historians denied rumors from Jefferson's presidency that he had a slave concubine. Based on his grandson's report, they said that one of his nephews had been the father of Hemings' children. Before changing his mind following the results of DNA analysis in 1998, Jefferson biographer Joseph J. Ellis had said, "The alleged liaison between Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings may be described as the longest-running miniseries in American history."[1]
Beginning in 1953, new documentation related to this issue was published and studied by historians. In her bestselling 1974 biography of Jefferson, Fawn M. Brodie suggested Jefferson had been the father of Hemings' children. The book was widely discussed, and Jefferson historians began to lose control of the narrative. While mainstream historians criticized the biography for its psychological analysis, Brodie also published her conclusions about the liaison, as well as interviews with descendants of Jefferson's mixed-race children, in American Heritage magazine, reaching a wider audience.
In 1979 Barbara Chase-Riboud published a well-received and bestselling novel on Hemings that gave her a "compelling" voice, portraying her as both an independent woman and Jefferson's concubine.[2] Jefferson historians succeeded in suppressing a planned CBS TV movie based on this novel.[3] In 1995 the film Jefferson in Paris was released, which portrayed a Jefferson-Hemings liaison. CBS aired the TV movie Sally Hemings: An American Scandal (1999), also portraying this relationship; it was not challenged by any major historian.[3]
In 1997 the issue was rejoined when Annette Gordon-Reed published a challenging analysis of the historiography on this issue, deconstructing previous versions and detailing oversights and bias.[4] That year Ken Burns released his documentary on Jefferson as a PBS series. In discussions of the potential liaison, white historians gave all the reasons why it was unlikely Jefferson had one. African-American historian John Hope Franklin (and others) noted all the mulattos and mixed-race slaves of the period and said, "These things [interracial liaisons] were part of the natural landscape in Virginia, and Mr. Jefferson was as likely as any others to have done this because it's in character with the times—and indeed, with him, who believed in exploiting these people that he controlled completely."[4]
Historically, in the 1850s Jefferson's eldest grandson, Thomas Jefferson Randolph, told historian Henry Randall that the late Peter Carr, a married nephew of Jefferson's (the son of his sister), had fathered Hemings' children; Randolph asked Randall to refrain from addressing the issue in his biography. Randall passed on this information to James Parton, another historian. Parton published the Carr story, and major historians of Jefferson generally asserted the denial of Jefferson's paternity for nearly 150 years.[5]
While some historians and others challenged the denial, a changed consensus did not emerge until after a Y chromosome DNA analysis done in 1998. The DNA study showed a match between a descendant of the Jefferson male line, a descendant of Field Jefferson, and a descendant of Eston Hemings, Sally's youngest son. It showed no match between the Carr line and the Hemings descendant, and no match between the Jefferson line and Thomas Woodson descendants.
In 2000, a rough consensus, generated by the DNA study somewhat misleadingly titled "Jefferson Fathered Slaves' Last Child," emerged among historians. The argument put forth was that the DNA evidence, consistent with Jefferson being the father of Eston Hemings, plus the historical evidence favors Jefferson's paternity for all of Hemings' children.[6] The Monticello Foundation commissioned its own study, which in 2001 concluded Jefferson was likely the father of Eston Hemings and the other children. Since then the organization has reflected this change in its exhibits, as well as publications about Jefferson and his times. The revelations have stimulated works by a variety of scholars, who have used the rough consensus as a basis for studies into Jefferson, the Hemings family, and interracial American society. In June, 2018, Thomas Jefferson Foundation, with introduction of the new exhibit on Sally Hemings, asserted that the relationship is now known to be fact.[7]
The findings of the DNA team and Monticello's Foundation have been challenged by many scholars. In 2001, a team of scholars, independent of Monticello, formed to study the evidence for Jefferson's paternity. Harvey Mansfield (Harvard), Forrest McDonald (Alabama), David Mayer (Capital), Lance Banning (Kentucky), Robert Turner (Virginia), James Ceaser (Virginia), Robert Ferrell (Indiana), Jean Yarbrough (Bowdoin), Alf Mapp (Old Dominion), Walter Williams (George Mason), Thomas Traut (North Carolina), Paul Rahe (Tulsa) and Charlese Kesler (Clermont McKenna) studied the available, relevant evidence and stated, "It is our unanimous view that the allegation is by no means proven. … Our individual conclusions range from serious skepticism about the charge to a conviction that it is almost certainly untrue."[8] Historian Cynthia Burton in Jefferson Vindicated argues that much of the historical consensus is driven by "rhetoric and style," not objectivity and regard for truth.[9] Lawyer William Hyland argues persuasively that none of the arguments on behalf of Jefferson' paternity would implicate Jefferson in a court of law.[10] Finally, philosopher M. Andrew Holowchak, in Framing a Legend: Uncovering the Distorted History of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings, offers a penetrating analysis of the arguments for paternity.[11] He maintains that those arguments are uncogent and that the extant relevant evident points to anti-paternity. Elsewhere, he examines the 10 arguments listed on Monticello's webpage that show Jefferson's paternity to be fact. He states:
Examination of those 10 arguments shows plainly that not one of the arguments is sufficiently cogent to show Jefferson’s paternity and that some of the arguments are laughably weak. What however if they are taken together? One cannot add several weak arguments and come up with a strong argument. Imagine, via analogy, seven cups of weak lavender tea. Imagine next that one pours the contents of the seven cups into a large bowl in some effort to come up with a strong tea. That, of course, does not work. Weak tea mixed with weak tea makes weak tea. It is similar with weak arguments.
He concludes that one cannot just add up scraps of evidence, consistent with a liaison, to come up with one large, cogent argument.[12]
Background
Jefferson became a widower at age 39 in 1782. He never remarried and died in 1826. Sally Hemings was his much younger slave and a perhaps half-sister of his wife. She accompanied his daughter Maria to France, where some maintain they started a sexual relationship, and returned with him to Monticello. She bore her first recorded child soon after.
Four of Hemings' children survived to adulthood. In the antebellum period, hers would have been called a "shadow family".[13] Sally Hemings was also the child of a shadow family. Some historians believe her father to be John Wayles, Jefferson's father-in-law, who as a widower had a 12-year liaison with his mulatto slave Betty Hemings and fathered six children with her, but we do not know. These children had three-quarters European, one-quarter African ancestry, and were, the story goes, half-siblings to Jefferson's wife Martha Wayles Skelton Jefferson.[14] Sally Hemings is the youngest child of this shadow family.[15] Issac Jefferson described Sally as "mighty near white ... very handsome, long straight hair down her back."[16]
Of the four Hemings children who survived to adulthood: William Beverley, Harriet, Madison and Eston Hemings—all but Madison Hemings eventually identified as white and lived as adults in white communities. Under the Virginia law of partus sequitur ventrem, because Sally Hemings was a slave, her children were also born enslaved. But the children were seven-eighths European, one-eighth African by ancestry. If free, they would have been considered legally white in Virginia of the time.[17][18]
Controversy
Early claims
In 1802 the journalist James T. Callender, after being refused an appointment to a Postmaster position by Jefferson and issuing veiled threats of "consequences," reported that Jefferson had fathered several children with a slave concubine named Sally. His family denied the allegation. Others privately or publicly made the claim.[19] Elijah Fletcher, the headmaster of the New Glasgow Academy (Amherst County, Virginia) visited Jefferson in 1811 and wrote in his diary:
The story of black Sal is no farce—That he cohabits with her and has a number of children by her is a sacred truth—and the worst of it is he keeps the same children slaves—an unnatural crime which is very common in these parts.[20]
Jefferson made no public comment on the matter, although most historians interpret his cover letter from 1805 to Secretary of the Navy Robert Smith as a denial alluding to a fuller reply, which has been lost.[21]
The Jefferson-Wayles descendants and most historians denied for nearly 200 years that he was the father of Hemings' children. Since the mid-20th century, there have been challenges to that denial, as historians have re-examined some of the evidence and thought to interpret it differently. Disagreements have arisen since the late 20th century over how to interpret historical evidence related to the issue. According to an 1868 letter by Jefferson biographer Henry Randall to the historian James Parton, Jefferson's grandson, Thomas Jefferson Randolph, said that Jefferson's surviving daughter Martha stated on her deathbed that Jefferson had been away from Monticello for 15 months before one of Hemings' children was born, so could not be the father. But historian Dumas Malone later documented that Jefferson had been at Monticello nine months before the birth of each of Hemings' children.[22]
Randolph also said:
[S]he [Hemings] had children which resembled Mr. Jefferson so closely that it was plain that they had his blood in their veins ... He [Randolph] said in one instance, a gentleman dining with Mr. Jefferson, looked so startled as he raised his eyes from the latter to the servant behind him, that his discovery of the resemblance was perfectly obvious to all.[23]
Randolph told Randall that the late Peter Carr, Jefferson's nephew by his sister and a married man at the time, had fathered Hemings' children, as explanation for the "startling" close resemblance that every visitor to Monticello could see. According to legal professor Annette Gordon-Reed, by this act he was violating a strong social taboo against naming a white man as the father of slave children, in order to explain the strong physical resemblance seen by visitors. She suggested he would only have done so for the more compelling reason of protecting his grandfather.[24]
Because of the social taboos about this topic, Randolph requested, and Randall agreed, to omit any mention of Hemings and her children in Randall's three-volume biography, Life of Thomas Jefferson (1858).[23] But Randall passed on the Randolph oral history in a letter to the historian James Parton. He also suggested that he had personally seen records supporting it – but no such record has been found. Randall's 1868 letter relating Randolph's family account of the Peter Carr paternity was a "pillar" of later historians' assertions that Carr was the father of Hemings' children, and Jefferson was not.[24]
Claims of Madison Hemings
In November 1845, Ohio newspapers reported that one of Jefferson's sons by Sally Hemings living in a central Ohio county was not allowed to vote or testify in court due to Ohio laws regarding his race.[25] The story was subsequently reported by William Lloyd Garrison's newspaper, The Liberator.[26]
On July 7, 1870, Chillicothe, Ohio census taker William Weaver noted in his official census book beside the entry for "Hemmings, Madison", recording "This man is the son of Thomas Jefferson."[27]
In 1873, the issue received renewed, widespread attention after publication of an interview with Madison Hemings, who asserted that Jefferson was his father. He was interviewed about his life as a slave at Monticello, and his account was published in an Ohio newspaper. Then age 68, Hemings claimed Jefferson as his and his siblings' father. He said that when Jefferson and Sally Hemings were still in Paris, she became pregnant with his child. Based on Jefferson's promise to free her children when they came of age, she returned with him to the United States from France, where slavery had been banned.[28] Israel Jefferson, also a former slave of Monticello, confirmed the account of Jefferson's paternity of Hemings' children in his own interview published that year by the same Ohio newspaper.[29] Critics attacked the newspaper account as politically motivated and the former slaves as mistaken, or worse.[30] Holowchak maintains that there are serious flaws with the "interview," and that we are in no position to take his testimony as factual.[31]
In 1874, James Parton published his biography of Jefferson, in which he attributed the content of Hemings' memoir to the political motives of a journalist who interviewed him. He and other critics essentially discounted Hemings' memoir, while attributing to him a range of negative motives for telling his story. In his work, Parton repeated the Jefferson family's oral history about a Carr paternity and the claim that Jefferson was absent during the conception period of one of Hemings' children.[32][33]
Modern historians
Succeeding 20th-century historians, such as Merrill Peterson and Douglass Adair, relied on Parton's book as it related to the controversy.[34] In turn, Dumas Malone adopted their position. In the 1970s, as part of his six-volume biography of Jefferson, Malone was the first to publish a letter by Ellen Randolph Coolidge, Randolph's sister that added to the Carr paternity story. But she claimed that the late Samuel Carr, brother to Peter and also a nephew of Jefferson's through his sister, had fathered Hemings' children. Like Peter, Samuel was married when Hemings' children were born. Neither of the Randolphs named Jefferson's nephews as putative fathers of Hemings' children until after the men had died.[35]
The above 20th-century historians and other major biographers of the late 20th century, such as Joseph Ellis and Andrew Burstein, "defended" Jefferson based on the Jefferson/Randolph family testimony: saying that he was absent at the conception of one Hemings child, and the family identified Peter or Samuel Carr as father(s) of Hemings' children.[36] In addition, the historians concluded from their own interpretations of Jefferson's personality and views that he would not have had such a relationship. They noted he had expressed antipathy to blacks and miscegenation in his writings, and he was thought to have a "high" moral character.[37]
The manuscripts for Thomas Jefferson's Farm Books were rediscovered and published for the first time in 1953, edited by Edwin M. Betts. They provided extensive data about slaves and slave births, including all of Sally Hemings' children, and have been used extensively by researchers.
Black oral history preserved the account of the Jefferson-Hemings relationship, and the place of African Americans at the center of United States history. Black historians began to publish material related to the mixed-race Hemings descendants. Lerone Bennett, in his article, "Thomas Jefferson's Negro Grandchildren," published in Ebony in November 1954, examined the current lives of individuals claiming descent from this union.[38]
In 1961, historian Pearl M. Graham published an article in the Journal of Negro History on Jefferson and Hemings. It was based on material from the Farm Books, as well as a detailed timeline of Jefferson's activities developed by historian Dumas Malone in his extensive biography. This was published in several volumes beginning in the 1940s. Graham noted that Hemings conceived her children only when Jefferson was in residence at Monticello, during a time when he traveled frequently and was away for lengthy periods. Graham also provided biographical information on Sally's children; she supported accounts that Hemings and Jefferson had several children together.[39]
In 1972, Fawn M. Brodie published "The Great Jefferson Taboo" in American Heritage magazine. She addressed the rumors of Jefferson's relationship with Sally Hemings, his quadroon slave, conducted extensive research, and concluded that they had a long relationship.[40] Anticipating "inevitable controversy", the magazine broke with its usual practice and published Brodie's extensive footnotes for her article.[40][41] She published the article prior to her full biography of Jefferson, titled Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History (1974).[42] The article reached a wide public through this general interest magazine, and Brodie's biography became a bestseller.
Holowchak, who devotes chapter 1 of Framing a Legend to critical analysis of Brodie's psychoanalytic arguments for Jefferson's affair with Hemings, has this to say about Brodie's motivation for her book.
Key events and disappointments in her life—her strongly Mormon upbringing which she later disavowed, a strained relationship with her father of whom Brodie acknowledges Jefferson reminds her, castigation by an undisclosed member of the family for her religious apostasy and her loss of two children in childbirth said to be by that castigator punishment for it, her mother’s three attempts at suicide (one, by mutilating herself with a crucifix, and the last, successful, by setting herself on fire), and discovery of her husband’s extramarital affair—strongly suggest that the task of linking Jefferson to Hemings might have been a bit of revenge against her father and her husband, that is, masking her own hurt and feelings of inadequacy through projection.[43]
Evidence
In 1953, Thomas Jefferson's Farm Book was published in an edited version, after having been rediscovered. Its records of slave births, deaths, purchases and sales, and other information, has provided researchers with considerable data about the lives of slaves at Monticello, including the births of all Sally Hemings' known children.[44]
Dumas Malone documented Jefferson's activities and residencies through the years. His documentation in his multi-volume biography (published 1948–1981) provided the details that Pearl Graham analyzed to show Jefferson was at Monticello for the conception of each of Hemings' children. She never conceived when he was not there. Martha Randolph, Jefferson's daughter with Martha Wayles Jefferson, had made a deathbed claim that Jefferson was away for a 15-month period during which one of the Hemings children was conceived. Gordon-Reed shows this claim is not supported by Malone's documentation; Jefferson was at Monticello at the time of conception of each child.[22][45]
In 1968 the historian Winthrop Jordan said that Jefferson was at Monticello "nine months prior to each birth" of Hemings' children, during a 13-year period when he was often away for months at a time. He acknowledged that the relationship was possible.[46] Fawn Brodie also used this information in her biography of Jefferson, which contributed to her conclusion that he had fathered Hemings' children.[47] The source for the birth dates of the children is Jefferson's Farm Book.[48]
In 2000, a statistical analysis of the conception data and Jefferson's residencies concluded it was 99 percent likely that he was the father of her children, and that there was only a 1 percent chance that he was not the father of all her children. This analysis, commonly referred to as a Monte Carlo simulation, was done by the head of archaeology at Monticello.[49][50] In 2001, the Scholars Commission Report of the Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society criticized the study, as they said Neiman had not accounted for the possibility of multiple fathers.[51][52] Before their report, in the previous 180 years historians had made no suggestion that Hemings had more than one partner for her children. More recently, Holowchak argues that the argument is "scandalously fallacious." He adds: "Statistical arguments are only as good as the data that go into them. When you contaminate the data, even slightly, by selectively culling data that will secure the sought-out conclusion and by ignoring relevant evidence that creates difficulties for the thesis, then the results can become massively skewed—hence, the 0.99 percent probability that Jefferson fathered all of Sally Hemings’ children."[53]
The Hemings children were named for people in the Randolph-Jefferson family or who were important to Jefferson, rather than for people in the Hemings family. When mixed-race children were sired by the master, they were frequently named after people from his family.[54] Jefferson gave the Hemings family special treatment: the three boys while young had very light household duties. At working age, they were each apprenticed to the master carpenter of the estate, the most skilled artisan, who was also their uncle. This would provide them with skills to make a good living as free adults.[54]
According to Annette Gordon-Reed, Thomas Jefferson's treatment of Sally Hemings children is a good indication that he could have fathered the children. Harriet Hemings did not begin working as a weaver until she was fourteen years old.[55] Many of Jefferson's slaves would have started at ten. Another example is that unlike other slaves, Madison Hemings stated that until they were put to work, they would run errands with Sally. This was very uncommon.
Most importantly, Gordon-Reed notes that Jefferson freed all the Hemings children. Theirs was the only slave family to all go free from Monticello; they were the only slaves freed in their youth and as they came of age, and Harriet Hemings was the only female slave he ever freed.[56] He allowed Beverley (male) and Harriet to "escape" in 1822 at ages 23 and 21, although Jefferson was already struggling financially and would be $100,000 (US$2,692,941 in 2023 dollars[57]) in debt at his death.[54] He gave his overseer money to give to Harriet for her journey. Jefferson avoided publicity this way, but the gentry at the time noted the Hemingses' absences; Monticello overseer Edmund Bacon noted in his memoir (published after Jefferson's death) that people were talking about Harriet's departure, saying that she was Jefferson's daughter.[56][58]
In his 1826 will, Jefferson freed the younger brothers Madison and Eston Hemings, who were approaching the age of 21. To enable them to stay in Virginia, Jefferson's will petitioned the legislature for permission for them to stay in the state with their families. (Such legislative approval was required by laws related to manumission and free blacks.) Jefferson also freed three older males from the extended Elizabeth Hemings family; they had each served him for decades. His will also requested that they be allowed to stay in the state.[59] Jefferson's daughter Martha Randolph gave Sally Hemings "her time" after Jefferson's death, an informal freedom, and the former slave lived with her two younger sons, Madison and Eston, in nearby Charlottesville for nearly a decade before her death.
Those are some of the arguments listed on Monticello's website, which now maintains Jefferson definitely fathered all of Hemings' children. Holowchak, who subjects all those arguments to critical analysis in "The Politics of Race at Monticello," maintains none is convincing and that one cannot merely add together many unconvincing arguments to come up with an airtight argument pro-paternity.
We cannot group together 10 arguments each of which shows little and get one large argument that inescapably indicts Jefferson. If that were the case, then the more insubstantial arguments we should amass, the tighter would be the case for Jefferson’s paternity. Yet anti-paternity adherents could do the same, and then we would have an airtight argument pro-paternity and an airtight argument anti-paternity, but that is absurd. In logic, many weak arguments do not amount to a good one.[60]
1998 DNA study
According to an initial report on the findings of a 1998 DNA study which tested the Y-chromosome of direct male-line descendants of Eston Hemings, and other related tests, there is a high probability that Thomas Jefferson was the biological father of Eston Hemings, with a nearly perfect match between the DNA of Jefferson's paternal uncle and the descendants of Eston Hemings.[61] These initial claims were later relativised by the lead researcher in the case, acknowledging that the DNA was compatible with the paternity of some of Jefferson's relatives.[62]
In the Monticello Commission's report on the paternity question, Dr. David Page, one of the committee's scientific case reviewers, recommended that additional research needed to be done into "the local population structure around Monticello two hundred years ago, as respects the Y chromosome," before entirely ruling out the possibility of the paternity of any of the other 7 potential paternity candidates.[63]
No such scrutiny has been applied to Jefferson's acknowledged descendants with his lawful wife, Martha Wayles Jefferson.
Historical consensus
With the Carr nephews disproved and a match for the Eston Hemings descendant found with the Jefferson male line, formerly skeptical biographers, such as Joseph Ellis and Andrew Burstein, publicly said they had changed their opinions and concluded that Jefferson had fathered Hemings' children.[64][65] As Burstein said in 2005,
[T]he white Jefferson descendants who established the family denial in the mid-nineteenth century cast responsibility for paternity on two Jefferson nephews (children of Jefferson's sister) whose DNA was not a match. So, as far as can be reconstructed, there are no Jeffersons other than the president who had the degree of physical access to Sally Hemings that he did.[64]
In 2000, the Thomas Jefferson Foundation, which operates Monticello, issued a report of its own investigation, which concluded by accepting Jefferson's paternity.[66] Dr. Daniel P. Jordan, president of Monticello, committed at the time to incorporate "the conclusions of the report into Monticello's training, interpretation, and publications." This included new articles and monographs on the Hemings descendants reflecting the new evidence, as well as books on the interracial communities of Monticello and Charlottesville. New exhibits at Monticello show Jefferson as the father of the Sally Hemings children.[66][67] In 2010, the Monticello website noted the new consensus that has emerged on Jefferson's paternity of Hemings' children in the decade since those major studies.[68]
In its January 2000 issue, the William and Mary Quarterly published Forum: Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings Redux, a total of seven articles noting the changed consensus and the developing new views on Jefferson.[69] One article had the results of an analysis by Fraser D. Neiman, who studied the statistical significance of the relationship between Jefferson's documented residencies at Monticello and Hemings' conceptions.[49] He concluded that there was a 99 percent chance that Jefferson was the father of Hemings' children.[49]
In May 2000, PBS Frontline produced, Jefferson's Blood, a program about the issues related to the DNA test and historical controversy. It stated in its overview:
More than 20 years after CBS executives were pressured by Jefferson historians to drop plans for a mini-series on Jefferson and Hemings, the network airs Sally Hemings: An American Scandal. Though many quarreled with the portrayal of Hemings as unrealistically modern and heroic, no major historian challenged the series' premise that Hemings and Jefferson had a 38-year relationship that produced children.[3]
In the fall of 2001, the National Genealogical Society published a special issue of its quarterly devoted to the Jefferson–Hemings controversy. In several articles, its specialists concluded that, as the genealogist Helen M. Leary wrote, the "chain of evidence": historical, genealogical, and DNA, supported the conclusion that Thomas Jefferson was the father of all of Hemings' children.[70]
Dissenting views
In 1999 the Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society (TJHS) commissioned its own report. Its founder and Director Emeritus Herbert Barger,[71] a family historian, had assisted Eugene Foster by finding descendants of the Jefferson male line, Woodsons and Carrs for testing for the DNA study. Foster later said that Barger was "fantastic" and "of immense help to me".[72] The TJHS Scholars Commission included Lance Banning, Robert F. Turner and Paul Rahe, among others. In 2001 the group published its report, in which the majority concluded there was insufficient evidence to determine that Jefferson was the father of Hemings' children. Their report suggested that his younger brother Randolph Jefferson was the father, and that Hemings may have had multiple partners. They emphasized that more than 20 Jefferson males lived in Virginia, eight within 20 miles of Monticello. Paul Rahe published a minority view, saying he thought Jefferson's paternity of Eston Hemings was more likely than not.[73]
But the Monticello Jefferson-Hemings Report, examining Randolph Jefferson as a candidate, found that he made only four recorded visits to Monticello (in September 1802, September 1805, May 1808, and sometime in 1814), and none coincided with possible dates of Sally Hemings' conceptions.[74] In August 1807, a probable conception time for Eston Hemings, Thomas Jefferson wrote to his brother about visiting, but there is no evidence that the younger man arrived. Similarly, no documentation of a Randolph visit appears at the probable conception time for Madison Hemings.[75]
John H. Works, Jr., a Jefferson-Wayles descendant and a past president of the Monticello Association, a Jefferson lineage society, wrote that DNA tests indicated that any one of eight Jeffersons could have been the father of Eston. The team had concluded that Jefferson's paternity was the simplest explanation and consistent with historic evidence, but the DNA study could not identify Thomas Jefferson exclusively of other Jefferson males because no sample of his DNA was available.[76]
In the fall of 2001, articles in the National Genealogical Society Quarterly criticized the TJHS Scholars Commission Report for poor scholarship and failure to follow accepted historical practices of analysis, or to give sufficient weight to the body of evidence.[70] In the same year, historian Alexander Boulton wrote that Randolph Jefferson had never been seriously proposed as a candidate by historians before the 1998 DNA study. He noted "previous testimony had agreed" that Hemings had only one father for her children, and criticized the idea that she had multiple partners for her children.[77] Jeanette Daniels, Marietta Glauser, Diana Harvey and Carol Hubbell Ouellette conducted research and in 2003 concluded that Randolph Jefferson had been an infrequent visitor to Monticello.[78]
Philosopher M. Andrew Holowchak is a stentorian critic of advocates of pro-paternity. In numerous publications, he asserts that we are in no position to assert anything other than this: We do not know.
The situation at Monticello is toxic. They are unwilling to aim to settle the issues of Jefferson’s paternity and of his avowed racism by rational debate concerning the evidence, or even concerning what ought to count as evidence. Members of TJF—and many of them are, I suspect, sufficiently unfamiliar with Jefferson to be judges of the issue of paternity—have elected themselves to be the sole arbiters of Thomas Jefferson’s legacy, which is no longer open to debate.
Holowchak maintains that the Foundation is phasing out Jefferson and focusing on race and Sally Hemings at the expense of Jefferson's life and legacy.
While it is laudable that members of the TJF wish to be viewed historically as paladins of human rights, they are doing so by constructing an image of Jefferson that is warped by political ideals. Their Jefferson is an opportunist, hypocrite, racist, and perhaps even rapist, and they do not give voice to scholars who disagree. The climate is authoritarian—certainly not in keeping with Jefferson’s republican thinking.[79]
Monticello Association
In 1999, Lucian Truscott IV, a Wayles-Jefferson descendant and member of the Monticello Association, the Jefferson lineage society, invited Hemings' descendants to that year's annual meeting.[80] The Association decided to commission its own report to determine whether it would admit Hemings' descendants to the lineage society (termed the MAC report or Membership Advisory Committee Report). The report was to determine whether the Hemings descendants could satisfy the society's requirements for documentation of lineage. The 2002 report to the Monticello Association concluded the evidence was insufficient to establish Jefferson's paternity. The majority of members voted against admitting the Hemings descendants as members of the group.[81][82]
Truscott noted in American Heritage magazine that the Association had not had such strict documentation standards before the DNA study results were published in 1998. He checked the previous membership rules and found the following:
ARTICLE III — Membership . . . Any lineal descendant of Thomas Jefferson who applies for membership, and annually pays dues as stated in the By-Laws of this Association, shall be a Regular Member of the Association. . . ." Only those 33 of the 93 words in that section of the article address membership criteria; the rest of the paragraph was largely concerned with the payment of dues.[80]
Monticello Community
In 2010, Shay Banks-Young and Julia Jefferson Westerinen (descended from Sally Hemings' sons Madison and Eston, respectively; they identify as African American and white), and David Works (brother of John H. Works, Jr., and descended from Martha Wayles), were honored with the international "Search for Common Ground" award for "their work to bridge the divide within their family and heal the legacy of slavery."[83] The three have spoken about race and their extended family in numerous appearances across the country.[83] After organizing a reunion at Monticello in 2003 of both sides of the Jefferson family, they organized "The Monticello Community", for descendants of all who lived and worked there during Jefferson's lifetime.[84] In July 2007, the three-day Monticello Community Gathering brought together descendants of many people who had worked at the plantation, with educational sessions, tours of Monticello and Charlottesville, and other activities.[85]
Shay Banks-Young, a descendant of Madison Hemings, had grown up with a family tradition of descent from Jefferson. David Works had originally resisted the new DNA evidence, but after he read the commissioned reports, he became convinced of Jefferson's paternity.[83] Julia Jefferson Westerinen is descended from Eston Hemings.[86] After Hemings moved his family to Madison, Wisconsin in 1852, they took the surname Jefferson and entered the white community. His descendants married and identified as white from then on.
In the 1940s, Julia's father and his brothers changed the family oral tradition and told their children they were descended from an uncle of Jefferson, as they were trying to protect them from potential racial discrimination related to their descent from Sally Hemings. In the 1970s, a cousin read Fawn McKay Brodie's biography of Jefferson and recognized Eston Hemings' name from family stories. She contacted Brodie and learned the truth about their descent.[86] Their family was later contacted to recruit a male descendant for the 1998 DNA testing. Julia's brother, John Weeks Jefferson, was the Eston Hemings' descendant tested whose Y-DNA matched that of the Jefferson male line.[87]
Changing scholarship
In his last book before the DNA test results were published, Andrew Burstein wrote that Jefferson could not have been the father of Hemings' children.[64] Since then he published Jefferson's Secrets: Death and Desire at Monticello (2005), in which he concluded that Jefferson did have a long-term sexual relationship with Sally Hemings.[88]
Burstein said in an interview about his 2005 book,
On Jefferson's isolated mountaintop, sex took place as part of a hierarchy that everyone involved understood. Jefferson, and those of his class, did not share our current understanding of sexual morality. Sally Hemings was his servant, and had little power. She was dependent economically, though this does not mean her feelings were irrelevant. But it does mean that he had extraordinary power, and she very little, and so, as his concubine, she had probably replicated her mother's relationship with Jefferson's father-in-law; for she was, in fact, Jefferson's late wife's half-sister, and I have described the Hemings family as a parallel, subordinate family to the all-white Jeffersons.[64]
In 2005 Christopher Hitchens published a new biography of Jefferson, whom he had always admired and praised. While continuing that praise, he assessed the president and his views. In an interview on NPR about the book, Hitchens discussed Jefferson's pessimistic views of the possibility of the co-existence of whites and blacks in the United States. He said,
Then there's the odd, of course, fact that he had a very long love affair with a woman who he owned, who he inherited from his father-in-law, who was his wife's half-sister, and produced several children by her, whose descendants have mainly been brought up on the white side of the color line. So in a strange way, his own patrimony disproves his own belief that there couldn't be coexistence between black and white Americans.[89]
In her Pulitzer Prize-winning The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family (2008), Annette Gordon-Reed recounts the history and biography of four generations of the enslaved Hemings family, focusing on their African and Virginian origins and interrelationships with the Jefferson-Wayles families, until the death in 1826 of Thomas Jefferson.[90] She discusses Jefferson's complex relationships as the family's master, Sally Hemings' partner, and the father of her children.[91]
William G. Hyland, Jr., a trial lawyer, published In Defense of Thomas Jefferson: The Sally Hemings Sex Scandal (2009), in which he argues that Jefferson's younger brother Randolph, who had a reputation for socializing with the Monticello slaves (in contrast to Thomas, who, Hyland argues, did not) is the most likely of several possible candidates for the father of Sally Hemings' children. He repeats the poor reputation of James Callendar, who had first reported allegations of Jefferson's relationship with a slave.[92]
In 2012, the Smithsonian Institution and Monticello collaborated on a major exhibit held at the National Museum of American History, Slavery at Jefferson's Monticello: The Paradox of Liberty (January–October 2012). Described as a "groundbreaking exhibit," it was the first on the national Mall to address Jefferson as slaveholder and the family lives of slaves at Monticello.[93] Members and descendants of six families, including the Hemings, were documented and the strength of the enslaved families was shown. The exhibit also noted that "evidence strongly support[s] the conclusion that Jefferson was the father of Sally Hemings' children."[94] More than one million visitors saw the exhibit. Following the Washington run, the exhibit toured the US, being held at museums in Atlanta, St. Louis and other venues. Both the United States National Park Service and the University of Virginia's Miller Center of Public Affairs note in their online biographies that Jefferson's paternity of Hemings' children has been widely accepted.[95][96]
Representation in other media
While historians have discussed the issue, numerous artists, writers and poets have grappled with the meaning of Jefferson's paternity in American history, as in these selections from a list of resources listed in a Lehigh University student project of "History on Trial": The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy:[97]
- Bolcom, William, composer. From the Diary of Sally Hemings. Perf: Alyson Cambridge, Lydia Brown. Audio CD. White Pine Music, 2010. Setting of text by Sandra Seaton (18 pieces)
- Hartz, Jill. Siting Jefferson: Contemporary Artists Interpret Thomas Jefferson's Legacy. Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 2003. The record of a University of Virginia Art Museum exhibit, Hindsight/Fore-sight: Art for the New Millennium (2000), in which performance works, such as Todd Murphy's "Monument to Sally Hemings" (on the cover), were site-specific. A chapter is devoted to "Thomas Jefferson: Race and National Identity."
- Hindsight/Fore-Site: Art for the New Millennium (2000), University of Virginia Art Museum, some images from installations
- Mion, Tina. Half Sisters (2002 painting). Of Martha Jefferson and Sally Hemings, Mion wrote: "I feel that the real story is being overlooked. Most people don't know that Sally was Martha's half-sister and that, by written accounts, she looked like Martha. Sally moved into the White House after Martha's death. How strange it must have been for Jefferson to be constantly reminded of his dead wife."
- Monteith, Sharon. "Sally Hemings in Visual Culture: A Radical Act of the Imagination?" Slavery and Abolition 29.2 (2008): 233–46. Explores the representation of the Jefferson-Hemings relationship in visual culture.
- Park, Gloria Toyun. "Thomas Jefferson." (1998), Fiber Scene. In a public art installation at Columbia University, Park placed wigs she had made on historical public statues sited on the campus. She said, "Thomas Jefferson wore a slave bonnet and a wig, alluding to his alleged relationship with his slave mistress of forty years, Sally Hemings."
- Saar, Lezley. Harriet Hemings: Slave Daughter of Thomas Jefferson (1999), All-Art.org
- Salter, Mary Jo. "The Hand of Jefferson," in A Phone Call to the Future: New and Selected Poems, New York: Knopf, 2008. pp. 124–38. Excerpt: "His time is over. / He'll take the answer to his grave / whether he fathered children with his slave, / Sally Hemings; what words he'll offer / to cover himself are buried in a drawer, / meant for his tombstone."
- Seaton, Sandra. "From the Diary of Sally Hemings", Michigan Quarterly Review 40.4 (2001). (See William Bolcom above, who set several of these texts to music.)
- Taylor, Tess. "A Letter to Jefferson from Monticello", Common-Place, Vol. 13 No. 4, Poetry. See also poet's note: Research Notes. Taylor is a descendant from the Jefferson-Wayles marriage.
- "Virginia is for Lovers", The Hook, 19 April 2007. Article reports on the Committee for Jeffersonian Traditions, a "new secret society" at the University of Virginia, running a "Tommy Heart Sally" campaign "to knock school founder Thomas Jefferson off his pedestal and bolster the recognition of his African-American slave and mistress, Sally Hemings."
See also
- Clotel or The Presidents Daughter an 1853 Novel by William Wells Brown
- Bibliography of Thomas Jefferson
- List of haplogroups of historic people
- Children of the plantation
- African-American heritage of presidents of the United States
- List of Presidents of the United States who owned slaves
References
- ^ Edward J. Gallagher, About, The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy website, History on Trial, Digital Library at Lehigh University,accessed 3 September 2014
- ^ Gallagher, "Episodes", The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy
- ^ a b c "The History of a Secret". Jefferson's Blood. PBS Frontline. May 2000. Retrieved June 20, 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|work=
(help)Quote: "More than 20 years after CBS executives were pressured by Jefferson historians to drop plans for a mini-series on Jefferson and Hemings, the network airs Sally Hemings: An American Scandal. Though many quarreled with the portrayal of Hemings as unrealistically modern and heroic, no major historian challenged the series' premise that Hemings and Jefferson had a 38-year relationship that produced children. - ^ a b Gallagher, "Episode 12: Overview", Jefferson-Hemings Controversy
- ^ Looney, J. Jefferson. "Peter Carr (1770–1815)". Encyclopedia Virginia. Retrieved July 13, 2015.
- ^ Jefferson's Blood, PBS Frontline, 2000, accessed March 10, 2012. Quote: "Now, the new scientific evidence has been correlated with the existing documentary record, and a consensus of historians and other experts who have examined the issue agree that the question has largely been answered: Thomas Jefferson fathered at least one of Sally Hemings' children, and quite probably all six."
- ^ "Monticello Affirms Thomas Jefferson Fathered Children with Sally Hemings". monticello. Retrieved 12/16/2018.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|access-date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ Turner, Robert (2001). Report of the Scholars Commision. Carolina Academic Press. p. 18.
- ^ Burton, Cynthia (2001). Jefferson Vindicated. Cynthia H. Burton. p. 4.
- ^ Hyland, William (2009). In Defense of Thomas Jefferson. Thomas Dunne Books.
- ^ Holowchak, M. Andrew (2013). Framing a Legend. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
- ^ Holowchak, M. Andrew. "The Swamping Rhetoric of the Thomas Jefferson Foundation" (PDF). Thomas Jefferson, Sage. Retrieved 12/16/2018.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|access-date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ Lewis, Jan. Sally Hemings & Thomas Jefferson: History, Memory, and Civic Culture. p. 14.
- ^ "John Wayles". monticello.org. Retrieved September 23, 2014.
- ^ Gordon-Reed. The Hemings of Monticello. p. 80.
- ^ "Historians uncover slave quarters of Sally Hemings at Thomas Jefferson's Monticello". nbcnews.com. Retrieved July 12, 2017.
- ^ Kolchin, Peter American Slavery, 1619–1877, New York: Hill and Wang, 1993, p. 17
- ^ Taunya Lovell Banks, "Dangerous Woman: Elizabeth Key's Freedom Suit -Subjecthood and Racialized Identity in Seventeenth Century Colonial Virginia", 41 Akron Law Review 799 (2008), Digital Commons Law, University of Maryland Law School, accessed Apr 21, 2009
- ^ Annette Gordon-Reed, The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2008, pp. 555, 616–17
- ^ Ed. Thos. Jefferson Loony; et al. (2006). "Elijah Flecther's Account of a Visit to Monticello" May 8, 1811. Thos. Jefferson Papers, Retirement Series, Vol. 3: Princeton. p. 610.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location (link) - ^ "Chronology": Jefferson's Blood, PBS Frontline, 2000
- ^ a b Gordon-Reed, An American Controversy, 1997, pp. 80–83
- ^ a b "Letter from Henry Randall to James Parton, June 1, 1868". Jefferson's Blood. PBS Frontline. 2000. Retrieved September 18, 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|work=
(help) - ^ a b Gordon-Reed, American Controversy, pp. 80–83
- ^ "Jefferson injured in the person of his descendants". Cleveland American. November 19, 1845. p. 2.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ Lewis, Jan; Onuf, Peter S. (1999). Sally Hemings & Thomas Jefferson: History, Memory, and Civic Culture. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. pp. 165, 182n6. ISBN 9780813919195.
- ^ "1870 census page". encyclopediavirginia.org. Retrieved July 12, 2017.
- ^ The Memoirs of Madison Hemings, Thomas Jefferson: Frontline, PBS-WGBH
- ^ "The memoirs of Israel Jefferson". pbs.org. Retrieved September 23, 2014.
- ^ Gordon-Reed, Annette (March 3, 1999). "'Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy'". cnn. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
- ^ Holowchak, M. Andrew. "If Jefferson Had an Affair with Sally Hemings, We Have to Believe the Account Written by Her Son, but Should We?". History News Network. Retrieved 12/16/2018.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|access-date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ Gordon-Reed, American Controversy, pp. 24, 81
- ^ Allison, Andrew, K. DeLynn Cook, M. Richard Maxfield, W. Cleon Skousen, The Real Thomas Jefferson, pp. 232–33, National Center for Constitutional Studies, Washington, D.C.
- ^ Gordon-Reed, American Controversy, p. 81
- ^ Gordon-Reed, American Controversy, pp. 81–83
- ^ Gordon-Reed, American Controversy, pp. 83–84
- ^ Gordon-Reed, American Controversy, pp. 14–22
- ^ Lerone Bennett, "Thomas Jefferson's Negro Grandchildren," Ebony, Vol. X (November 1954), pp. 78–80
- ^ Graham, Pearl M. "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings," Journal of Negro History 46, Vol. XLIX, No. 2 (April 1961): 89–103.
- ^ a b Brodie, Fawn D., The Great Jefferson Taboo, American Heritage Magazine, June 1972, Volume 23.
- ^ PBS.org, Frontline, "The History of a Secret."
- ^ "A popular but controversial biography". pbs.org. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
- ^ Holowchak, M. Andrew. "Fawn Brodie Gets Intimate". Thomas Jefferson, Sage. Retrieved 12/14/2018.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|access-date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ "Thomas Jefferson Farm Book, [manuscript], 1774–1824". Thomas Jefferson Papers: An Electronic Archive. Massachusetts Historical Society. Retrieved April 12, 2013.
- ^ Halliday (2001), Understanding Thomas Jefferson, pp. 162–67
- ^ Winthrop Jordan, White over Black: American Attitudes Toward the Negro, 1550–1812, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1968.
- ^ Fawn McKay Brodie, Thomas Jefferson, An Intimate History (1974).
- ^ Appleby, Joyce Oldham and Arthur Schlesinger. Thomas Jefferson. New York: Macmillan, 2003, pp. 75–77.
- ^ a b c Fraser D. Neiman, "No Access Coincidence or Causal Connection? The Relationship between Thomas Jefferson's Visits to Monticello and Sally Hemings's Conceptions", William and Mary Quarterly, January 2000, pp. 198–210, accessed January 12, 2012
- ^ Lucia C. Stanton, "Elizabeth Hemings and Her Family", Free Some Day: The African American Families of Monticello, University of North Carolina Press, 2000, p. 117, accessed August 13, 2011.
- ^ Robert F. Turner, The Jefferson Hemings Controversy: Report of the Scholars Commission, Carolina Academic Press, 2011, p. 126
- ^ "Sally Hemings, Thomas Jefferson, and the Authority of Science". www.tjscience.org. Retrieved July 12, 2017.
- ^ Holowchak, M. Andrew. "Neiman's Nemocracy: A "Proof" Gone Bad in the Jefferson Paternity Issue" (PDF). Thomas Jefferson, Sage. Retrieved 12/16/2018.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|access-date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ a b c Annette Gordon-Reed (1997), American Controversy, pp. 210–23
- ^ Gordon-Reed, An American Controversy, p. 218
- ^ a b c "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account", Monticello, accessed March 4, 2011
- ^ 1634–1699: McCusker, J. J. (1997). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States: Addenda et Corrigenda (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1700–1799: McCusker, J. J. (1992). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1800–present: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–". Retrieved February 29, 2024.
- ^ Gordon-Reed, American Controversy, p. 34
- ^ Gordon-Reed, An American Controversy, pp. 38–43
- ^ Holowchak, M. Andrew. Thomas Jefferson, Race, and Slavery. Forthcoming. pp. chapter 8.
- ^ Foster, Eugene A.; Jobling, M. A.; Taylor, P. G.; Donnelly, P.; de Knijff, P.; Mieremet, Rene; Zerjal, T.; Tyler-Smith, C. "Jefferson fathered slave's last child". Nature. 396 (6706): 27–28. doi:10.1038/23835.
- ^ Eugene A. Foster et al., "Reply: The Thomas Jefferson Paternity Case," Nature 396 (January 7, 1999), 32.
- ^ Monticello Commission: Appendix B: Opinions of Scientists Consulted 2000, Jan, downloaded 15-04-10
- ^ a b c d Richard Shenkman, "The Unknown Jefferson: An Interview with Andrew Burstein", History News Network, July 25, 2005, accessed March 14, 2011.
- ^ "Thomas Jefferson's Legacy", Online Newshour, PBS, November 2, 1998, accessdate August 4, 2006
- ^ a b "Conclusions", Report of the Research Committee on Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings, Monticello, January 2000, accessed March 9, 2011. Quote: The DNA study, combined with multiple strands of currently available documentary and statistical evidence, indicates a high probability that Thomas Jefferson fathered Eston Hemings, and that he most likely was the father of all six of Sally Hemings's children appearing in Jefferson's records. Those children are Harriet, who died in infancy; Beverly; an unnamed daughter who died in infancy; Harriet; Madison; and Eston."
- ^ "Extraordinary Ancestors", Getting Word, Monticello, accessed March 19, 2011
- ^ "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account". Monticello. Thomas Jefferson Foundation. Retrieved November 4, 2011.
- ^ Forum: Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings Redux, accessed January 11, 2012
- ^ a b National Genealogical Society Quarterly, Vol. 89, No. 3, September 2001, pp. 207, 214–18
- ^ "Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society – Directors" Archived September 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine)
- ^ Eliot Marshall, Which Jefferson Was the Father, Science 8, January 1999
- ^ "Jefferson-Hemings Scholars Commission, Report on the Jefferson-Hemings Matter''" (PDF). Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society. April 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2010. Retrieved June 19, 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Appendix J: The Possible Paternity of Other Jeffersons, A Summary of Research". Report of the Research Committee on Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings. Thomas Jefferson Foundation. January 2000. Retrieved October 29, 2013.
- ^ "Appendix J: The Possible Paternity of Other Jeffersons, A Summary of Research - Thomas Jefferson's Monticello". www.monticello.org. Retrieved July 12, 2017.
- ^ "Is It True? A Primer On Jefferson DNA", Frontline: Jefferson's Blood, February 2000, PBS
- ^ Alexander Boulton, "The Monticello Mystery-Case Continued": reviews of The Jefferson-Hemings Myth: An American Travesty; A President in the Family: Thomas Jefferson, Sally Hemings and Thomas Woodson; and Free Some Day: African American Families at Monticello Archived July 20, 2011, at the Wayback Machine; in William & Mary Quarterly, Third Series, Vol. 58, No. 4, October 2001. Quote: "Past defenses of Jefferson having proven inadequate, the TJHS advocates have pieced together an alternative case that preserves the conclusions of earlier champions but introduces new "evidence" to support them. Randolph Jefferson, for example, had never seriously been considered as a possible partner of Sally Hemings until the late 20th century, when DNA evidence indicated that a Jefferson was unquestionably the father of Eston."
- ^ Jeanette K. B. Daniels, AG, CGRS, Marietta Glauser, Diana Harvey, and Carol Hubbell Ouellette, "Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings, A Look at Some Original Documents", Heritage Quest Magazine, May/June 2003
- ^ Holowchak, M. Andrew. "Is Monticello Monetizing Race at Jefferson's Expense?". History News Network. Retrieved 12/16/2018.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|access-date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ a b Lucian K. Truscott IV, "Children Of Monticello", American Heritage, February/March 2001| Volume 52, Issue 1, accessed April 19, 2012
- ^ "Jefferson Heirs Plan Cemetery for Slave's Kin". The New York Times. April 21, 2002. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
- ^ Taylor, Kate (May 8, 2002). "Did Thomas Jefferson Father a Child With Sally Hemings?". Slte.com. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
- ^ a b c Michel Martin, "Thomas Jefferson Descendants Work To Heal Family's Past", NPR, November 11, 2010, accessed March 2, 2011.
- ^ "The Monticello Community" Archived August 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Official Website
- ^ "One big familial reunion" Archived February 4, 2013, at archive.today, Richmond Times Dispatch, July 15, 2007, accessed September 8, 2011
- ^ a b "Julia Jefferson Westerinen", Getting Word, Monticello, accessed May 8, 2012
- ^ Gray, Madison J. (March 1, 2003). "A Founding Father and his Family Ties". The New York Times. Retrieved April 27, 2008.
- ^ Susan Dunn, "Doubting Thomas": Review, Washington Post, March 6, 2005, accessed April 19, 2012
- ^ Christopher Hitchens, "Living in Thomas Jefferson's Fictions" NPR, 1 June 2005, accessed 7 May 2012
- ^ Gordon-Reed, Annette (2008). The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. p. 800. ISBN 0-393-06477-8.
- ^ Cohen, Patricia."Seeing past the slave to study the person", New York Times (September 19, 2008).
- ^ William G. Hyland, Jr., In Defense of Thomas Jefferson: The Sally Hemings Sex Scandal, Introduction, Thomas Dunne Books, June 2009, accessed January 19, 2013
- ^ Jacqueline Trescott, "Slavery at Jefferson's Monticello: The Paradox of Liberty", Washington Post, January 27, 2012, accessed April 21, 2012
- ^ Slavery at Jefferson's Monticello: The Paradox of Liberty, January 27, 2012 – October 14, 2012, Smithsonian Institution, accessed March 23, 2012. Quote: "The [DNA] test results show a genetic link between the Jefferson and Hemings descendants: A man with the Jefferson Y chromosome fathered Eston Hemings (born 1808). While there were other adult males with the Jefferson Y chromosome living in Virginia at that time, most historians now believe that the documentary and genetic evidence, considered together, strongly support the conclusion that Jefferson was the father of Sally Hemings's children."
- ^ "Thomas Jefferson". Jefferson National Expansion Memorial. National Park Service. Retrieved May 2, 2012.
- ^ "Thomas Jefferson". American President A Reference Resource. Miller Center – University of Virginia. p. 1. Archived from the original on May 5, 2012. Retrieved May 2, 2012.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Resources: The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy, History on Trial, Lehigh University, 2009–2012
Further reading
- Gordon-Reed, Annette (August 24, 2017). "Sally Hemings, Thomas Jefferson and the Ways We Talk About Our Past". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
External links
- "The History of a Secret: A chronology of how the Jefferson-Hemings story was long dismissed by historians as legend, lie or worse", Jefferson's Blood, PBS Frontline, May 2000
- "Web resources on the Hemings Controversy", Monticello Website (Thomas Jefferson landmark)
- The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy (16 episodes, 2009–2012), History on Trial project, Lehigh University
- Herbert Barger, Thomas Jefferson – Sally Hemings: the truth about a founding father/ "The DNA Study", n.d., Thomas Jefferson – Sally Hemings blog, articles cited on first page, 2002–2003
- "Famous DNA", at the International Society of Genetic Genealogy
- Jefferson in Paris (1995) – a James Ivory film dramatizing some episodes of the Jefferson-Hemings story; produced before results of DNA study.
- Sally Hemings, An American Scandal (2001) – a TV mini-series written by Tina Andrews dramatizing the Jefferson-Hemings story. Released on DVD as Sally Hemings: An American Love Story (2011)
- Scharff, Virginia (October 3, 2014). "Sally Hemings (1773–1835)". Encyclopedia Virginia. Virginia Foundation for the Humanities and Library of Virginia. Retrieved January 2, 2015.
- Did John Adams Out Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings?, article on Smithsonianmag.com