Jump to content

Geneva Protocol (1924): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m I added an additional information.
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
(13 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Proposal to the League of Nations}}
{{other uses2|Geneva Protocol}}
{{other uses|Geneva Protocol (disambiguation)}}
The '''Geneva Protocol for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes''' was a proposal to the [[League of Nations]] presented by British Prime Minister [[Ramsay MacDonald]] and his French counterpart [[Édouard Herriot]]. It set up compulsory arbitration of disputes and created a method to determine the aggressor in international conflicts. All legal disputes between nations would be submitted to the World Court. It called for a disarmament conference in 1925.
The '''Geneva Protocol for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes''' was a proposal to the [[League of Nations]] presented by British Prime Minister [[Ramsay MacDonald]] and his French counterpart [[Édouard Herriot]]. It set up compulsory arbitration of disputes and created a method to determine the aggressor in international conflicts. All legal disputes between nations would be submitted to the World Court. It called for a disarmament conference in 1925.


Any government that refused to comply in a dispute would be named an aggressor. Any victim of aggression was to receive immediate assistance from League members. British Conservatives condemned the proposal for fear that it would lead to conflict with the United States, which also opposed the proposal, and so it was shelved. The Geneva Protocol solved thus one problem clerverly (''i.e.'' by providing that any State that resorted to war without first submitting to the international dispute settlement machinery was an aggressor). But in solving this problem, the Protocol created a new one: the enforcement mechanism was drawn on the League of Nations' mechanism (''i.e.'' Articles 10 & 16 Versailles Treaty) thus leaving war a perfectly legal response for those States that had not joined the League<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/981586753|title=The internationalists : how a radical plan to outlaw war remade the world|last=Anne,|first=Hathaway, Oona|publisher=|others=Shapiro, Scott,|year=|isbn=9781501109867|edition=First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition|location=New York|pages=117-119|oclc=981586753}}</ref>. Moreover, by providing for financial and commercial sanctions, Parties to Protocol might be required to infringe upon their neutral commitments since they were legally obliged to impose sanctions against an aggressor<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/981586753|title=The internationalists : how a radical plan to outlaw war remade the world|last=Anne,|first=Hathaway, Oona|publisher=|others=Shapiro, Scott,|year=|isbn=9781501109867|edition=First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition|location=New York|pages=119|oclc=981586753}}</ref>.
Any government that refused to comply in a dispute would be named an aggressor. Any victim of aggression was to receive immediate assistance from League members. British Conservatives condemned the proposal for fear that it would lead to conflict with the United States, which also opposed the proposal, and so it was shelved. The Geneva Protocol solved thus one problem cleverly (''i.e.'' by providing that any State that resorted to war without first submitting to the international dispute settlement machinery was an aggressor). But in solving this problem, the Protocol created a new one: the enforcement mechanism was drawn on the League of Nations' mechanism (''i.e.'' Articles 10 & 16 Versailles Treaty) thus leaving war a perfectly legal response for those States that had not joined the League.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The internationalists : how a radical plan to outlaw war remade the world|last=Anne|first=Hathaway, Oona|others=Shapiro, Scott|isbn=9781501109867|edition= First Simon & Schuster hardcover |location=New York|pages=117–119|oclc=981586753|date = 2017-09-12}}</ref> Moreover, by providing for financial and commercial sanctions, Parties to Protocol might be required to infringe upon their neutral commitments since they were legally obliged to impose sanctions against an aggressor.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The internationalists : how a radical plan to outlaw war remade the world|last=Anne|first=Hathaway, Oona|others=Shapiro, Scott|isbn=9781501109867|edition= First Simon & Schuster hardcover |location=New York|pages=119|oclc=981586753|date = 2017-09-12}}</ref>


The Protocol envisaged wide-ranging regulations to bring about general disarmament, effective international security and the compulsory arbitration of disputes. In the Geneva Protocol the member states would declare themselves “ready to consent to important limitations of their sovereignty in favor of the League of Nations” (Wehberg). After preliminary approval on 2 October 1924 by all the 47 member states of the League of Nations at the 5th General Assembly, however, it was not ratified by Great Britain the following year under the newly elected government of [[Stanley Baldwin]], with [[Austen Chamberlain]] as [[Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs]] (from 1924 to 1929). The Protocol subsequently failed to materialize.
The Protocol envisaged wide-ranging regulations to bring about general disarmament, effective international security and the compulsory arbitration of disputes. In the Geneva Protocol the member states would declare themselves “ready to consent to important limitations of their sovereignty in favor of the League of Nations” (Wehberg). After preliminary approval on 2 October 1924 by all the 47 member states of the League of Nations at the 5th General Assembly, however, it was not ratified by Great Britain the following year under the newly elected government of [[Stanley Baldwin]], with [[Austen Chamberlain]] as [[Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (UK)|Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs]] (from 1924 to 1929). The Protocol subsequently failed to materialize.
==Notes==
{{Reflist}}


==External links==
== See also ==
*[[Kellogg–Briand Pact]]
* [http://www.refworld.org/docid/40421a204.html Text of the protocol]
*[[Permanent Court of Arbitration]]
* [http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-23-49-cc-12-25-21.pdf Text of British Cabinet resolution of March 2, 1925 not to ratify the protocol, from the UK National Archives]
*[[International Court of Justice]]
* [http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-24-172-CP-105.pdf Report made by Imperial Defence Committee, recommending to the UK government not to ratify the Geneva Protocol, from UK National Archives]
*[[Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments]]
* [http://digital.library.northwestern.edu/league/le000016.pdf Protocol for the pacific settlement of international disputes. Declarations by the members of the Council made at the thirty-third session of the Council, Geneva (March 1925)]
*[[Conference on Disarmament]]
{{Gutenberg|no=28950|name=The Geneva Protocol}} (A book about the agreement by [[David Hunter Miller]])
*[[Rome Statute]]


== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==
* Burks, David D. "The United States and the Geneva Protocol of 1924: 'A New Holy Alliance'? ''American Historical Review'' (1959) 64#4 pp.&nbsp;891–905 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1905122 in JSTOR]
* Burks, David D. "The United States and the Geneva Protocol of 1924: 'A New Holy Alliance'? ''American Historical Review'' (1959) 64#4 pp.&nbsp;891–905 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1905122 in JSTOR]
* [[David Hunter Miller|Miller, David Hunter.]] ''The Geneva Protocol'' (Macmillan, 1925) [https://books.google.com/books?id=C4QaAAAAIAAJ&dq=geneva+proposal+1924&pg=PA3 online].

*{{cite book
*{{cite book
| last = Noel-Baker
| last = Noel-Baker
Line 31: Line 37:
| year = 1931
| year = 1931
}}
}}
* Williams, John F. "The Geneva Protocol of 1924 for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes." ''Journal of the British Institute of International Affairs'' 3.6 (1924): 288-304.

==External links==
* [http://www.refworld.org/docid/40421a204.html Text of the protocol]
* [http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-23-49-cc-12-25-21.pdf Text of British Cabinet resolution of March 2, 1925 not to ratify the protocol, from the UK National Archives]
* [http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-24-172-CP-105.pdf Report made by Imperial Defence Committee, recommending to the UK government not to ratify the Geneva Protocol, from UK National Archives]
* [http://digital.library.northwestern.edu/league/le000016.pdf Protocol for the pacific settlement of international disputes. Declarations by the members of the Council made at the thirty-third session of the Council, Geneva (March 1925)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160426220515/http://digital.library.northwestern.edu/league/le000016.pdf |date=2016-04-26 }}


[[Category:League of Nations]]
[[Category:League of Nations]]
[[Category:Treaties concluded in 1924]]
[[Category:Treaties concluded in 1924]]
[[Category:Arbitration law]]
[[Category:Arbitration law]]
<references />

Revision as of 11:32, 25 May 2024

The Geneva Protocol for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes was a proposal to the League of Nations presented by British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald and his French counterpart Édouard Herriot. It set up compulsory arbitration of disputes and created a method to determine the aggressor in international conflicts. All legal disputes between nations would be submitted to the World Court. It called for a disarmament conference in 1925.

Any government that refused to comply in a dispute would be named an aggressor. Any victim of aggression was to receive immediate assistance from League members. British Conservatives condemned the proposal for fear that it would lead to conflict with the United States, which also opposed the proposal, and so it was shelved. The Geneva Protocol solved thus one problem cleverly (i.e. by providing that any State that resorted to war without first submitting to the international dispute settlement machinery was an aggressor). But in solving this problem, the Protocol created a new one: the enforcement mechanism was drawn on the League of Nations' mechanism (i.e. Articles 10 & 16 Versailles Treaty) thus leaving war a perfectly legal response for those States that had not joined the League.[1] Moreover, by providing for financial and commercial sanctions, Parties to Protocol might be required to infringe upon their neutral commitments since they were legally obliged to impose sanctions against an aggressor.[2]

The Protocol envisaged wide-ranging regulations to bring about general disarmament, effective international security and the compulsory arbitration of disputes. In the Geneva Protocol the member states would declare themselves “ready to consent to important limitations of their sovereignty in favor of the League of Nations” (Wehberg). After preliminary approval on 2 October 1924 by all the 47 member states of the League of Nations at the 5th General Assembly, however, it was not ratified by Great Britain the following year under the newly elected government of Stanley Baldwin, with Austen Chamberlain as Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (from 1924 to 1929). The Protocol subsequently failed to materialize.

Notes

  1. ^ Anne, Hathaway, Oona (2017-09-12). The internationalists : how a radical plan to outlaw war remade the world. Shapiro, Scott (First Simon & Schuster hardcover ed.). New York. pp. 117–119. ISBN 9781501109867. OCLC 981586753.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ Anne, Hathaway, Oona (2017-09-12). The internationalists : how a radical plan to outlaw war remade the world. Shapiro, Scott (First Simon & Schuster hardcover ed.). New York. p. 119. ISBN 9781501109867. OCLC 981586753.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

See also

Bibliography

  • Burks, David D. "The United States and the Geneva Protocol of 1924: 'A New Holy Alliance'? American Historical Review (1959) 64#4 pp. 891–905 in JSTOR
  • Miller, David Hunter. The Geneva Protocol (Macmillan, 1925) online.
  • Noel-Baker, Philip (1925). The Geneva Protocol for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. London: P. S. King & Son Ltd.
  • Wehberg, Hans (1931). The Outlawry of War: A Series of Lectures Delivered Before the Academy of International Law at the Hague and in the Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales at Geneva. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Williams, John F. "The Geneva Protocol of 1924 for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes." Journal of the British Institute of International Affairs 3.6 (1924): 288-304.