Hen Ogledd: Difference between revisions
fictious => fictituous |
Natty4bumpo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Yr.Hen.Ogledd.550.650.Koch.jpg|frameless|right|220px]] |
[[File:Yr.Hen.Ogledd.550.650.Koch.jpg|frameless|right|220px]] |
||
{{TOC right}} |
{{TOC right}} |
||
'''''Yr Hen Ogledd''''' ({{lang-en|The Old North}}) is a [[Welsh language|Welsh]] term used by scholars to refer to those parts of what is now [[northern England]] and [[Scottish Lowlands|southern Scotland]] in the years between 500 and the [[Viking invasions]] of c. 800, with particular interest in the [[Brythonic languages|Brythonic]]-speaking peoples who lived there. |
'''''Yr Hen Ogledd''''' ({{lang-en|The Old North}}) is a [[Welsh language|Welsh]] term used by scholars to refer to those parts of what is now [[northern England]] and [[Scottish Lowlands|southern Scotland]] in the years between 500 and the [[Viking invasions]] of c. 800, with particular interest in the [[Brythonic languages|Brythonic]]-speaking peoples who lived there, in what had previously been the area "between the Walls" ([[Hadrian Wall|Hadrian]] and [[Antonine Wall|Antonine]]) and the territory of the [[Dux Britanniarum]] (the last of whom was [[Coel Hen]], from whom several of the northern dynasties claimed descent) when the island remained part of the Empire. These areas approximated the boundaries of the Roman provinces of [[Valentia (Roman Britain)|Valentia]] and of [[Maxima Caesariensis]]. |
||
The term is derived from heroic poetry as told by [[bard]]s for the enjoyment and benefit of the [[Wales|Welsh]] kings of that era. From the relatively southern Welsh perspective, these are stories of the ''Gwŷr y Gogledd'' ({{lang-en|Men of the North}}), with their relationships to the great men of the past given by genealogies such as ''[[Bonedd Gwŷr y Gogledd]]'' ({{lang-en|Descent of the Men of the North}}). 'The North' has become 'The Old North' in recognition of the passage of time since the literary works were contemporary, hence 'The Old North' and 'Men of the Old North'. |
The term is derived from heroic poetry as told by [[bard]]s for the enjoyment and benefit of the [[Wales|Welsh]] kings of that era. From the relatively southern Welsh perspective, these are stories of the ''Gwŷr y Gogledd'' ({{lang-en|Men of the North}}), with their relationships to the great men of the past given by genealogies such as ''[[Bonedd Gwŷr y Gogledd]]'' ({{lang-en|Descent of the Men of the North}}). 'The North' has become 'The Old North' in recognition of the passage of time since the literary works were contemporary, hence 'The Old North' and 'Men of the Old North'. |
||
Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
==Attested kingdoms and regions== |
==Attested kingdoms and regions== |
||
Kingdoms in the Old North that are mentioned as kingdoms in the literary and historical sources include: |
Kingdoms in the Old North that are mentioned as kingdoms in the literary and historical sources include: |
||
* [[Aeron (kingdom)|Aeron]] |
* [[Aeron (kingdom)|Aeron]] (possibly the same as Strath Eireann, or Strathearn) |
||
* Alt Clut |
* Alt Clut/Ystrad Clu/[[Kingdom of Strathclyde|Strathclyde]]) |
||
* Argoed (aka South Rheged) |
|||
* [[Bryneich#British_Bryneich|Bryneich]] |
|||
* [[Deifr]] |
|||
* [[Din Eidyn]] |
|||
* [[Dunod_Fawr|Dunoting/Dent]] (northern Pennines) |
|||
* [[Ebrauc]] |
|||
* [[Elmet]] |
* [[Elmet]] |
||
* [[Gododdin]] |
* [[Gododdin]] |
||
* [[Manaw Gododdin]] |
* [[Manaw Gododdin]] |
||
* [[Novantae|Novant]] |
|||
* [[Rheged]] (its location is never made clear, and still has not been conclusively determined) |
|||
* [[Peak_District#Early_history|Peak]] (southern Pennines) |
|||
Several regions are mentioned in the sources, assumed to be notable regions within one of the kingdoms: |
|||
* [[Pennines#Early_Middle_Ages|Pennines]] |
|||
* Argoed |
|||
* [[Rheged]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
* [[Dál Riata]] |
* [[Dál Riata]] |
||
* [[Northumbria]] and its predecessor states, [[Bernicia]] and [[Deira]] |
* [[Northumbria]] and its predecessor states, [[Bernicia]] and [[Deira]] |
||
* [[Picts|Pictish kingdom]] |
* [[Picts|Pictish kingdom]] |
||
* [[Fortriu]] |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
Revision as of 18:57, 22 November 2010
Yr Hen Ogledd (English: The Old North) is a Welsh term used by scholars to refer to those parts of what is now northern England and southern Scotland in the years between 500 and the Viking invasions of c. 800, with particular interest in the Brythonic-speaking peoples who lived there, in what had previously been the area "between the Walls" (Hadrian and Antonine) and the territory of the Dux Britanniarum (the last of whom was Coel Hen, from whom several of the northern dynasties claimed descent) when the island remained part of the Empire. These areas approximated the boundaries of the Roman provinces of Valentia and of Maxima Caesariensis.
The term is derived from heroic poetry as told by bards for the enjoyment and benefit of the Welsh kings of that era. From the relatively southern Welsh perspective, these are stories of the Gwŷr y Gogledd (English: Men of the North), with their relationships to the great men of the past given by genealogies such as Bonedd Gwŷr y Gogledd (English: Descent of the Men of the North). 'The North' has become 'The Old North' in recognition of the passage of time since the literary works were contemporary, hence 'The Old North' and 'Men of the Old North'.
In attempting to construct a reasonably accurate history of southern Scotland and northern England, scholars have adopted the term 'The Old North' from the Welsh heroic poetry to refer to the Brythonic kingdoms, such as Rheged. As used by historians, the term is meant to apply to an area of scholarly research, and is not intended to give undue weight to the poetry and genealogy that first produced the term.
Welsh interest
One of the traditional stories relating to the creation of Wales is derived from the arrival in Wales of Cunedda and his sons as 'Men of the North'. Cunedda himself is held to be the progenitor of the royal dynasty of Gwynedd, one of the largest and most powerful of the medieval Welsh kingdoms, and an ongoing participant in the history of the Old North. However, the relationship between Wales and the Old North is more substantial than this one event, amounting to a self-perception that the Welsh and the Men of the North are one people.[note 1]
Many of the traditional sources of information about the Old North are believed to have come to Wales from the Old North, and bards such as Aneirin (the reputed author of Y Gododdin) are thought to have been court poets in the Old North. These stories and bards are held to be no less Welsh than the stories and bards who were actually from Wales.
Sources
A listing of passages from the literary and historical sources, particularly relevant to the Old North, can be found in Anwyl's article Wales and the Britons of the North.[4] A somewhat dated introduction to the study of old Welsh poetry can be found in his 1904 article Prolegomena to the Study of Old Welsh Poetry.[5]
Literary sources
- The bardic poetry attributed to Taliesin, Aneirin, and Llywarch Hen.
- The genealogical tracts of the Harleian genealogies, the Bonedd Gwŷr y Gogledd, and the genealogies of Jesus College MS 20.
- The Triads of the Island of Britain (note that most of the triads published in the notorious third volume of The Myvyrian Archaiology of Wales are known to be the forgeries of Iolo Morganwg, and are not considered valid sources of historical information).[6] The standard scholarly edition is Trioedd Ynys Prydein by Rachel Bromwich.[7]
- The other elegies (Welsh: marwnadau) and songs of praise (Welsh: canu mawl), as well as certain mythological stories, that have been preserved.
Stories praising a patron and the construction of flattering genealogies are neither unbiased nor reliable sources of historically accurate information. However, while they may exaggerate and make apocryphal assertions, they do not falsify or change the historical facts that were known to the bards' listeners, as that would bring ridicule and disrepute to both the bards and their patrons. In addition, the existence of stories of defeat and tragedy, as well as stories of victory, lends additional credibility to their value as sources of history. Within that context, the stories contain useful information, much of it incidental, about an era of British history where very little is reliably known.
Historical sources
- The Historia Brittonum attributed to Nennius
- The Annales Cambriae
- The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
- The Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum by Bede
- The Annals of Tigernach
These sources are not without deficiencies. Both the authors and their later transcribers sometimes displayed a partisanship that promoted their own interests, portraying their own agendas in a positive light, always on the side of justice and moral rectitude. Facts in opposition to those agendas are sometimes omitted, and apocryphal entries are sometimes added.
While Bede was a Northumbrian partisan and spoke with prejudice against the native Britons, his Ecclesiastical History is highly regarded for its effort towards an accurate telling of history, and for its use of reliable sources. When passing along "traditional" information that lacks a historical foundation, Bede takes care to note it as such.[8]
The De Excidio et Conquestu Britainniae by Gildas (c. 516 – 570) is occasionally relevant in that it mentions early people and places also mentioned in the literary and historical sources. The work was intended to preach Christianity to Gildas' contemporaries and was not meant to be a history. It is one of the few contemporary accounts of his era to have survived.
False sources
The Historia Regum Britanniae of Geoffrey of Monmouth is disparaged as pseudohistory, though it looms large as a source for the largely fictional romantic stories known collectively as the Matter of Britain. The lack of historical value attributed to the Historia lies only partly in the fact that it contains so many fictions and falsifications of history;[note 2] the fact that historical accuracy clearly was not a consideration in its creation makes any references to actual people and places no more than a literary convenience.
The Iolo Manuscripts are a collection of manuscripts presented in the early 19th century by Edward Williams, who is better known as Iolo Morganwg. Containing various tales, anecdotal material and elaborate genealogies that connect virtually everyone of note with everyone else of note (and with many connections to Arthur and Iolo's native region of Morgannwg), they were at first accepted as genuine, but have since been shown to be an assortment of forged or doctored manuscripts, transcriptions, and fantasies, mainly invented by Iolo himself. A list of works tainted by their reliance on the material presented by Iolo (sometimes without attribution) would be quite long.
Background
Almost nothing is reliably known of Central Britain before c. 550. There had never been a long-term, effective Roman control north of the Tyne – Solway line, and south of that line effective Roman control ended long before the traditional departure of the Roman military from Roman Britain in 407. It was noted in the writings of Ammianus Marcellinus and others that there was ever-decreasing Roman control from the 2nd century onward, and in the years after 360 there was widespread disorder and the large-scale permanent abandonment of territory by the Romans.
In 550 the region was controlled by Brythonic-speaking peoples except for the eastern coastal areas, which were controlled by the Anglian-speaking peoples of Bernicia and Deira. To the north were the Picts, with the Irish-descended kingdom of Dál Riata to the northwest. All of these peoples would play a role in the history of the Old North.
Historical context
From a historical perspective the portrayal of the Men of the North as native Britons defending against intruding Saxons is a partisan view. Wars were frequently internecine, and Britons were aggressors as well as defenders, as was also true of the Angles, Picts, and Scots. However, those Welsh stories of the Old North that tell of Briton fighting Anglian have a counterpart, told from the opposite side. The story of the demise of the kingdoms of the Old North is the story of the rise of Northumbria from two coastal kingdoms to become the premier power in Britain north of the Humber Estuary and south of the Firths of Clyde and Forth.
The interests of kingdoms of this era were not restricted to their immediate vicinity. Alliances were not made only within the same ethnic groups, nor were enmities restricted to nearby different ethnic groups. An alliance of Britons fought against an alliance of Britons at the Battle of Arfderydd. Áedán mac Gabráin of Dál Riata appears in the Bonedd Gwŷr y Gogledd, a genealogy among the pedigrees of the Men of the North.[12] The Historia Brittonum states that the Northumbrian king Oswiu married a Briton who may have had some Pictish ancestry.[13][14] A marriage between the Northumbrian and Pictish royal families would produce the Pictish king Talorgan. Áedán mac Gabráin fought as an ally of the Britons against the Northumbrians. Cadwallon ap Cadfan of Gwynedd allied with Penda of Mercia to defeat Edwin of Northumbria.
Conquest and defeat did not necessarily mean the extirpation of one culture and its replacement by another. The Brythonic region of northwestern England was absorbed by Anglian Northumbria in the 7th century, yet it would re-emerge 300 years later as South Cumbria, joined with North Cumbria (Strathclyde) into a single state.
Societal context
The organisation of the Men of the North was tribal,[note 3] based on kinship groups of extended families, owing allegiance to a dominant 'royal' family, sometimes indirectly through client relationships, and receiving protection in return. For Celtic peoples, this organisation was still in effect hundreds of years later, as shown in the Irish Brehon law, the Welsh Laws of Hywel dda, and the Scottish Laws of the Brets and Scots. The Germanic Anglo-Saxon law had culturally different origins, but with many similarities to Celtic law. Like Celtic law, it was based on cultural tradition, without any perceivable debt to the Roman occupation of Britain.[note 4]
A primary royal court (Welsh: llys) would be maintained as a 'capital', but it was not the bureaucratic administrative centre of modern society, nor the settlement or civitas of Roman rule. As the ruler and protector of his kingdom, the king would maintain multiple courts throughout his territory, traveling among them to exercise his authority and to address the needs of his clients, such as in the dispensing of justice. This ancient method of dispensing justice survived throughout England as a part of royal procedure until the reforms of Henry II (reigned 1154 – 1189) modernised the administration of law.
Attested kingdoms and regions
Kingdoms in the Old North that are mentioned as kingdoms in the literary and historical sources include:
- Aeron (possibly the same as Strath Eireann, or Strathearn)
- Alt Clut/Ystrad Clu/Strathclyde)
- Argoed (aka South Rheged)
- Bryneich
- Deifr
- Din Eidyn
- Dunoting/Dent (northern Pennines)
- Ebrauc
- Elmet
- Gododdin
- Manaw Gododdin
- Novant
- Peak (southern Pennines)
- Pennines
- Rheged
Kingdoms that were not part of the Brythonic "Old North" but are part of its history include:
- Dál Riata
- Northumbria and its predecessor states, Bernicia and Deira
- Pictish kingdom
- Fortriu
See also
Notes
- ^ The modern Welsh term for themselves, Cymry, derives from this ancient relationship. It is not originally an ethnic or cultural term, and refers to the Welsh of Wales and the Brythonic-speaking Men of the North, exclusive of all others.[1][2] It has never included the Cornish or the Bretons, who are of similar heritage, culture, and language to both the Welsh and the Men of the North. The word came into use as a self-description by the early 7th century, and probably earlier.[3] It had been used in the Middle Ages to describe both Strathclyde (the successor state to Ystrad Clud, known as North Cumbria, which flourished c. 900 – 1100) and western England north of the Ribble Estuary (South Cumbria). It survives today both in the name of Wales (Welsh: Cymru, land of the Cymry) and in the name of one of the territories of the Old North, Cumbria.
- ^ Scholarly works by reputable authors, such as Lloyd's 1911 A History of Wales from the Earliest Times to the Edwardian Conquest, contain numerous citations of Geoffrey's fabrications of history, never citing him as a source of legitimate historical information.[9] More recent works of history tend to spend less energy on Geoffrey's Historia, merely ignoring him in passing. In Davies's 1990 A History of Wales, the first paragraph of page 1 discusses Geoffrey's prominence, after which he is occasionally mentioned as the source of historical inaccuracies and not as a source of legitimate historical information.[10] Earlier works might devote a few paragraphs detailing the proof that Geoffrey was the inventor of fictitious information, such as in James Parker's The Early History of Oxford, where persons such as Eldad, Eldod, Abbot Ambrius, and others are noted to be the result of Geoffrey's own imagination.[11]
- ^ The tribal domains were called kingdoms and were led by a king, but were not organised nation-states in the modern (or ancient Roman) sense of the word. The kingdoms might grow and shrink based on the transitory fortunes of the leading tribe and royal family, with regional alliances and enmities playing a part in the resulting organisation. This organisation was applicable to southern Wales of the post-Roman era, where the royal inter-relationships of the kingdoms of Glywysing, Gwent, and Ergyng are so completely inter-twined that it is not possible to construct an independent history for any of them. When contention (ie, 'war') occurred, it was between high-ranking individuals and their respective clients, in the manner of the contending House of Lancaster and House of York during the Wars of the Roses in the 15th century.
- ^ "Anglo-Saxon law" is a modern neologism for the Saxon Law of Wessex, the Anglian Law of Mercia, and the Danelaw, all of which were sufficiently similar to merit inclusion within this umbrella term. The laws of Anglian Northumbria were supplanted by the Danelaw, but were certainly similar to these. The origins of English law have been much studied. For example, the 12th century Tractatus de legibus et consuetudinibus regni Angliae (English: Treatise on the laws and customs of the Kingdom of England) is the book of authority on English common law, and scholars have held that it owes a debt to Norman law and to Germanic law, and not to Roman law.
Citations
- ^ Lloyd 1911:191–192, Note to Chapter VI, the Name "Cymry"
- ^ Phillimore, Egerton (1888), "Review of "A History of Ancient Tenures of Land in the Marches of North Wales"", in Phillimore, Egerton (ed.), Y Cymmrodor, vol. IX, London: Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion, pp. 368–371
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Phillimore, Egerton (1891), "Note (a) to The Settlement of Brittany", in Phillimore, Egerton (ed.), Y Cymmrodor, vol. XI, London: Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion (published 1892), pp. 97–101
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Anwyl, Edward (July 1907 – April 1908), "Wales and the Britons of the North", The Celtic Review, vol. IV, Edinburgh: Norman Macleod (published 1908), pp. 125–152, 249–273
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^
Anwyl, Edward (1904), "Prolegomena to the Study of Old Welsh Poetry", Transactions of the Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion (Session 1903 – 1904), London: Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion (published 1905), pp. 59–83
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Lloyd 1911:122–123, Notes on the Historical Triads, in The History of Wales
- ^ Rachel Bromwich (ed.), Trioedd Ynys Prydein (University of Wales Press, revised edition 1991) ISBN 0 7083 0690.
- ^ For a recent view of Bede's treatment of Britons in his work, see W. Trent Foley and N.J. Higham, "Bede on the Britons." Early Medieval Europe 17.2 (2009): pp. 154–85.
- ^ Lloyd 1911, A History of Wales
- ^ Davies 1990:1, A History of Wales
- ^ Parker, James (1885), "Description of Oxford in Domesday Survey", The Early History of Oxford 727 – 1100, Oxford: Oxford Historical Society, p. 291
- ^ Bromwich, Rachel (2006), Trioedd Ynys Prydein: The Triads of the Island of Britain, University of Wales Press, pp. 256–257, ISBN 0-7083-1386-8
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Nennius (c. 800), "Genealogies of the Saxon kings of Northumbria", in Stevenson, Joseph (ed.), Nennii Historia Britonum, London: English Historical Society (published 1838), p. 50
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|year=
and|date=
(help)CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Nicholson, E. W. B. (1912), "The 'Annales Cambriae' and their so-called 'Exordium'", in Meyer, Kuno (ed.), Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, vol. VIII, Halle: Max Niemeyer, p. 145
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
References
- Davies, John (1990), A History of Wales (First ed.), London: Penguin Group (published 1993), ISBN 0-713-99098-8
- Jackson, Kenneth Hurlstone (1953), Language and History in Early Britain: A chronological survey of the Brittonic languages, first to twelfth century A.D., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - Koch, John T., ed. (2005), Celtic Culture: A Historical Encyclopedia, ABL-CLIO (published 2006), ISBN 9781851094400
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - Lloyd, John Edward (1911), A History of Wales from the Earliest Times to the Edwardian Conquest, vol. I (Second ed.), London: Longmans, Green, and Co. (published 1912)
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
Further reading
- Alcock, Leslie. Kings and Warriors, Craftsmen and Priests in Northern Britain, AD 550-850. Edinburgh, 2003.
- Alcock, Leslie. "Gwyr y Gogledd. An archaeological appraisal." Archaeologia Cambrensis 132 (1984 for 1983). pp. 1-18.
- Cessford, Craig. "Northern England and the Gododdin poem." Northern History 33 (1997). pp. 218-22.
- Dark, Kenneth R. Civitas to Kingdom. British political continuity, 300-800. London: Leicester UP, 1994.
- Dumville, David N. "Early Welsh Poetry: Problems of Historicity." In Early Welsh Poetry: Studies in the Book of Aneirin, ed. Brynley F. Roberts. Aberystwyth, 1988. 1-16.
- Dumville, David N. "The origins of Northumbria: Some aspects of the British background." In The Origins of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, ed. S. Bassett. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1989. pp. 213-22.
- Higham, N.J. "Britons in Northern England: Through a Thick Glass Darkly." Northern History 38 (2001). pp. 5-25.
- Macquarrie, A. "The Kings of Strathclyde, c.400-1018." In Medieval Scotland: Government, Lordship and Community, ed. A. Grant and K.J. Stringer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1993. pp. 1-19.
- Miller, Molly. "Historicity and the pedigrees of north countrymen." Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies 26 (1975). pp. 255-80.
- Woolf, Alex. "Cædualla Rex Brettonum and the Passing of the Old North." Northern History 41.1 (2004): 1-20.
External links
- Matthews, Keith J. "What's in a name? Britons, Angles, ethnicity and material culture from the fourth to seventh centuries." Heroic Age 4 (Winter 2001).