TESCREAL: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 11:3311:33, 31 July 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 27,780 bytes −40‎ Altered title. Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Use American English from July 2024 | #UCB_Category 857/959 undo

curprev 14:4114:41, 26 July 2024‎ Bdnor talk contribs‎ m 27,861 bytes +27‎ Formatting sections undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 09:5709:57, 26 July 2024‎ JoaquimCebuano talk contribs‎ 27,834 bytes +461‎ New source undo
curprev 00:0800:08, 26 July 2024‎ JoaquimCebuano talk contribs‎ 27,373 bytes −25‎ The editor didnt explained which part has 'weasel words', indeed, they barely substantiated their claims in the discussion before or after putting this mark undo

curprev 13:5613:56, 21 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 27,548 bytes +771‎ Undid revision 1235806700 by Biohistorian15 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
curprev 09:3409:34, 21 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 26,777 bytes −771‎ Appears to me like a valid and sourced criticism was unduly removed undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 21:5821:58, 20 July 2024‎ Alenoach talk contribs‎ 27,548 bytes +771‎ One of the two sources focuses on longtermism (which Torres groups as TESCREAL), and the other one directly on TESCREAL. It clears a misunderstanding and explains that Torres's disagreement is not about whether there are existential risks, but about what the solution is. I added back a reworked version, hoping it's ok to you. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
curprev 17:2617:26, 20 July 2024‎ Bluethricecreamman talk contribs‎ 26,777 bytes −731‎ A) this article does not mention TESCREAL B) I think when we resurrected this article, we made it a point to try to avoid citing many of the non-independent sourcing, and focus on articles not by torres and gebru C) characterizing emile torres as anti-tech is not what the article says and is WP:SYNTH. If Ozzy Brennan says Torres is anti-tech progress, attribute it to them. undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 06:4206:42, 20 July 2024‎ Alenoach talk contribs‎ 27,508 bytes +1,081‎ Added a paragraph undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 23:3823:38, 19 July 2024‎ Avatar317 talk contribs‎ 26,427 bytes +14‎ →‎Alleged "TESCREALists": oops, got confused, only $5m from FTX, and it was Fried and other company insiders. undo
curprev 23:3223:32, 19 July 2024‎ Avatar317 talk contribs‎ 26,413 bytes −1‎ →‎Alleged "TESCREALists": Better summary of source, which never says that Fried was responsible for the money transfers, rather FTX. undo
curprev 22:2122:21, 19 July 2024‎ Avatar317 talk contribs‎ 26,414 bytes +322‎ →‎Alleged "TESCREALists": Removed WP:SYNTH unsupported by the sources. 1) G&T's paper is not a RS for this claim. 2) WashingtonSpectator source only talks about Fried's association with EA, and 3) Guardian source only mentions TESCREAL once, (and calls it "so-called Tescreal") with no clear links to Fried other than the following sentence we have in the article, which is to source. undo
curprev 17:4917:49, 19 July 2024‎ Etryn talk contribs‎ m 26,092 bytes +4‎ →‎Alleged "TESCREALists": Add link to SBF's page where his name is mentioned undo

curprev 03:0703:07, 18 July 2024‎ Bluethricecreamman talk contribs‎ 26,088 bytes −181‎ A) the tag is incorrect to place over a statement that is correctly attributed to Gebru and torres, with a linked footnote as well. B) The evidence used to suggest that all folks in EA movement are left wing in discussion was an internet poll on a forum C) suggesting that right-wing somehow is so insulting as to be libel on people mentioned further down seems silly and is not pertinent to WP:DUBIOUS. I'm removing the right-wing part as a concession, its not that necessary. undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 02:3602:36, 18 July 2024‎ JPxG talk contribs‎ 26,269 bytes +26‎ restore tag; the issue was not resolved at the talk page undo

curprev 22:0322:03, 17 July 2024‎ Bluethricecreamman talk contribs‎ 26,243 bytes −474‎ WP:BRD, see discussion, but this is part of Gebru/Torres's theory, and the statement is attribute correctly. Undid revision 1235142120 by Alenoach (talk) undo Tag: Undo
curprev 21:5921:59, 17 July 2024‎ GorillaWarfare talk contribs‎ 26,717 bytes +8‎ Undid revision 1235145743 by 184.53.32.85 (talk) see liberal eugenics for an explanation of the term, and why the modifier is needed undo Tag: Undo
curprev 21:5721:57, 17 July 2024‎ 184.53.32.85 talk‎ 26,709 bytes −8‎ →‎Alleged "TESCREALists": removed an inaccurate inflamatory & insulting political description undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
curprev 21:3721:37, 17 July 2024‎ Alenoach talk contribs‎ 26,717 bytes +474‎ Added the template "dubious" on a sentence, with the rationale inside (see the talk page) undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

curprev 00:3200:32, 9 July 2024‎ Avatar317 talk contribs‎ 25,335 bytes +166‎ added "right-wing" to how G & T characterize this, with quote in reference: "The pair propose this acronym describes a suite of right-wing ideologies that are coming to dominate Silicon Valley." - Two other sources in the article also describe it thusly. undo

curprev 11:4111:41, 8 July 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 25,169 bytes −460‎ Altered template type. Add: magazine, authors 1-1. Removed URL that duplicated identifier. Removed access-date with no URL. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Philosophy of technology | #UCB_Category 31/36 undo

curprev 15:3015:30, 6 July 2024‎ GorillaWarfare talk contribs‎ 25,629 bytes +68‎ →‎Analysis: closer description of the source provided undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 05:5805:58, 6 July 2024‎ Bluethricecreamman talk contribs‎ m 25,561 bytes −290‎ typo, accidentally did same ref twice. undo Tag: Visual edit