Taiwan and weapons of mass destruction: Difference between revisions
Fixed a historical statistics entry |
Senorangel (talk | contribs) deployed to Taiwan |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Nuclear weapons == |
== Nuclear weapons == |
||
{{Infobox nukes|country_name=[[Taiwan|Republic of China]]|image_location=ROC Taiwan (orthographic projection).svg|program_start=1964 (ended in 1988)|last_test=Jioupeng Base, Pingtung<ref name="diary">"ROC Chief of the General Staff, General Hau Pei-tsun, met the director of [[American Institute in Taiwan]], David Dean in his office after Colonel Chang's defection in 1988. Dean questioned him with the US satellite imagery detecting a minimized nuclear explosion at the Jioupeng military test field in Pingtung in 1986. Hao answered that, after nearly 20 years of research, ROC had successfully produced a controlled nuclear reaction. Hau recorded the statement in his diary and published on the Issue 1 (2000), but was removed from the later re-issues." {{cite book|last=Hau|first=Pei-tsun|title=Ba nian can mou zong zhang ri ji|trans-title=8-year Diary of the Chief of the General Staff (1981–1989) |url=https:// |
{{Infobox nukes|country_name=[[Taiwan|Republic of China]]|image_location=ROC Taiwan (orthographic projection).svg|program_start=1964 (ended in 1988)|last_test=Jioupeng Base, Pingtung<ref name="diary">"ROC Chief of the General Staff, General Hau Pei-tsun, met the director of [[American Institute in Taiwan]], David Dean in his office after Colonel Chang's defection in 1988. Dean questioned him with the US satellite imagery detecting a minimized nuclear explosion at the Jioupeng military test field in Pingtung in 1986. Hao answered that, after nearly 20 years of research, ROC had successfully produced a controlled nuclear reaction. Hau recorded the statement in his diary and published on the Issue 1 (2000), but was removed from the later re-issues." {{cite book|last=Hau|first=Pei-tsun|title=Ba nian can mou zong zhang ri ji|trans-title=8-year Diary of the Chief of the General Staff (1981–1989) |url=https://openlibrary.org/books/OL13062852M/Ba_nian_can_mou_zong_zhang_ri_ji_(She_hui_ren_wen)#about/about |publisher=[[:zh:天下文化|Commonwealth Publishing]] |date=1 January 2000 |issue=Issue 1|isbn=9576216389 |language=zh-TW |location=Taipei}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Chen |first=Wei-ting |date=21 February 2016 |title=電文解密{{nbsp}}... 1970年代 美阻我兩波核武發展 |trans-title=Telegram Decryption{{nbsp}}... US Blocked 2 Tides of Nuclear Weapon Development in 1970s |url=http://udn.com/news/story/9492/1515007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160506011809/http://udn.com/news/story/9492/1515007 |archive-date=6 May 2016 |access-date=13 May 2021 |newspaper=[[United Daily News]] |language=zh-TW}}</ref> |
||
|total_tests=unknown|peak_stockpile=None|current_stockpile=None|NPT_party=Formerly}} |
|||
During the [[Cold War]], the United States deployed nuclear weapons on Taiwan as part of the [[United States Taiwan Defense Command]]. In 1972, United States president [[Richard Nixon]] ordered nuclear weapons to be removed from Taiwan and this was implemented by 1974. Nuclear weapons are known to have been stored at [[Tainan Air Force Base]].<ref name=nsaebb>{{cite news |work=[[National Security Archive]] |series=National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book |issue=20 |first1=Robert S. |last1=Norris |first2=William M. |last2=Arkin |first3=William |last3=Burr |title=United States Secretly Deployed Nuclear Bombs In 27 Countries and Territories During Cold War |date=20 October 1999 |publication-place=Washington, D.C. |url=https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/news/19991020 |archive-date=7 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210207142738/https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/news/19991020 }}</ref> |
During the [[Cold War]], the United States deployed nuclear weapons on Taiwan as part of the [[United States Taiwan Defense Command]]. In 1972, United States president [[Richard Nixon]] ordered nuclear weapons to be removed from Taiwan and this was implemented by 1974. Nuclear weapons are known to have been stored at [[Tainan Air Force Base]].<ref name=nsaebb>{{cite news |work=[[National Security Archive]] |series=National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book |issue=20 |first1=Robert S. |last1=Norris |first2=William M. |last2=Arkin |first3=William |last3=Burr |title=United States Secretly Deployed Nuclear Bombs In 27 Countries and Territories During Cold War |date=20 October 1999 |publication-place=Washington, D.C. |url=https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/news/19991020 |archive-date=7 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210207142738/https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/news/19991020 }}</ref> |
||
Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
In 1967, a secret nuclear weapons program began under the auspices of the [[Institute of Nuclear Energy Research]] (INER) at the [[Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology]]. Taiwan was able to acquire nuclear technology from abroad (including a research reactor from Canada and low-grade [[plutonium]] from the United States) allegedly for a civilian energy system, but in actuality to develop fuel for nuclear weapons.<ref>{{cite book |publication-place=Ithaca, New York, United States |publisher=[[Cornell University Press]] |title=Taiwan: A Political History |first=Denny |last=Roy |via=[[Archive.org]] |url=https://archive.org/details/taiwan00denn |lccn=2002012235 |oclc=2002012235 |isbn=978-0-8014-4070-0 |year=2003 }}</ref> Taiwan bought 100 tons of [[uranium metal]] from South Africa which was delivered between 1973 and 1974.<ref name="ISIS 2018" /> |
In 1967, a secret nuclear weapons program began under the auspices of the [[Institute of Nuclear Energy Research]] (INER) at the [[Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology]]. Taiwan was able to acquire nuclear technology from abroad (including a research reactor from Canada and low-grade [[plutonium]] from the United States) allegedly for a civilian energy system, but in actuality to develop fuel for nuclear weapons.<ref>{{cite book |publication-place=Ithaca, New York, United States |publisher=[[Cornell University Press]] |title=Taiwan: A Political History |first=Denny |last=Roy |via=[[Archive.org]] |url=https://archive.org/details/taiwan00denn |lccn=2002012235 |oclc=2002012235 |isbn=978-0-8014-4070-0 |year=2003 }}</ref> Taiwan bought 100 tons of [[uranium metal]] from South Africa which was delivered between 1973 and 1974.<ref name="ISIS 2018" /> |
||
During the 1970s, Taiwan had an active program to produce [[plutonium]] using [[Pressurized_heavy-water_reactor#Nuclear_proliferation|heavy water reactors]]. However, after the [[International Atomic Energy Agency]] (IAEA) found evidence of Taiwan's efforts to produce [[weapons-grade plutonium]], Taiwan agreed in September 1976 under U.S. pressure to dismantle its nuclear weapons program.<ref>{{cite news |publication-place=Taipei, Taiwan |issn=1563-9525 |publisher=The Liberty Times group |work=[[Taipei Times]] |department=Local News |date=14 October 1999 |page=3 |first=William |last=Ide |title=How the US stopped Taiwan's bomb |url=https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/1999/10/14/0000006401 |archive-date=7 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191007140439/https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/1999/10/14/0000006401 }}</ref> {{citation needed|reason=IAEA ‘evidence’ needed|date=April 2020}} A study by the [[Mitre Corporation]] in 1977, included Taiwan in a list of "insecure" nuclear threshold states—states with the technical capability to develop nuclear weapons and the security motivations to seriously contemplate such an option. The other states were [[Israel]], [[South Africa]], [[South Korea]], and [[Yugoslavia]].<ref>{{cite report |type=Independent panel report |title=Nuclear Power Issues and Choices: Report of the Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group |publisher=Ballinger Publishing Company/[[Mitre Corporation]]/Ford Foundation |publication-place=Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States |year=1977 |author=Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group |isbn=978-0-88410-065-2 |oclc=2799099 |editor-first=Spurgeon M. |editor-last=Keeny |
During the 1970s, Taiwan had an active program to produce [[plutonium]] using [[Pressurized_heavy-water_reactor#Nuclear_proliferation|heavy water reactors]]. However, after the [[International Atomic Energy Agency]] (IAEA) found evidence of Taiwan's efforts to produce [[weapons-grade plutonium]], Taiwan agreed in September 1976 under U.S. pressure to dismantle its nuclear weapons program.<ref>{{cite news |publication-place=Taipei, Taiwan |issn=1563-9525 |publisher=The Liberty Times group |work=[[Taipei Times]] |department=Local News |date=14 October 1999 |page=3 |first=William |last=Ide |title=How the US stopped Taiwan's bomb |url=https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/1999/10/14/0000006401 |archive-date=7 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191007140439/https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/1999/10/14/0000006401 }}</ref> {{citation needed|reason=IAEA ‘evidence’ needed|date=April 2020}} A study by the [[Mitre Corporation]] in 1977, included Taiwan in a list of "insecure" nuclear threshold states—states with the technical capability to develop nuclear weapons and the security motivations to seriously contemplate such an option. The other states were [[Israel]], [[South Africa]], [[South Korea]], and [[Yugoslavia]].<ref>{{cite report |type=Independent panel report |title=Nuclear Power Issues and Choices: Report of the Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group |publisher=Ballinger Publishing Company/[[Mitre Corporation]]/Ford Foundation |publication-place=Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States |year=1977 |author=((Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group)) |isbn=978-0-88410-065-2 |oclc=2799099 |editor-first=Spurgeon M. Jr. |editor-last=Keeny |page=284 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Nuclear Power: Issues and Choices. Report of the Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group. (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1977. Pp. xvii + 418. $16.50, cloth; $6.95, paper.) |first=John H. |last=Barton |volume=73 |issue=1 |journal=[[American Political Science Review]] |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/nuclear-power-issues-and-choices-report-of-the-nuclear-energy-policy-study-group-cambridge-mass-ballinger-publishing-company-1977-pp-xvii-418-1650-cloth-695-paper/40A954DE03597BD84F9FB58C61582344 |doi=10.2307/1954874 |pages=349–350 |date=1 March 1979 |issn=0003-0554 |lccn=08009025 |oclc=805068983 |jstor=00030554 |publisher=[[American Political Science Association]]/[[Cambridge University Press]] |s2cid=146895629 |publication-place=Washington, D.C. }}</ref> [[United States Intelligence Community|U.S. intelligence]] also believed that Taiwan had designed devices suitable for [[nuclear testing]].<ref>{{cite report |url=https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB190/03.pdf |title=The 22 September 1979 Event |type=Interagency intelligence memorandum |date=25 January 1980 |page=5 |publication-place=Washington, D.C. |via=[[National Security Archive]] |archive-date=24 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224164419/https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB190/03.pdf |publisher=[[United States Intelligence Community]]/[[Arms Control and Disarmament Agency|United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency]] |department=[[United States National Security Council|National Security Council]]/[[National Intelligence Board|National Foreign Intelligence Board]]/Interagency Intelligence Working Group on Nuclear Proliferation |author=National Intelligence Officer for Nuclear Proliferation |id=MORI DocID: 1108245 }}</ref> In 1980 the Taiwanese contracted for 4,000 tons of uranium metal from South Africa although it is not known how much of this order was ever delivered.<ref name="ISIS 2018" /> |
||
The leaders of the program needed very high assurance in the functioning and reliability of any nuclear device they designed, but without the ability to conduct a full-scale [[Nuclear weapons testing|nuclear weapons test]]. Besides the need to keep the program covert, an underground nuclear test was not feasible on such a small and densely populated island such as Taiwan. Therefore the program used specialised computer software to simulate nuclear weapon explosions, the code of which was constantly upgraded and improved as more knowledge was acquired via experiments or by clandestine information gathering. To circumvent detection by foreign intelligence agencies while developing and refining necessary skills, Taiwan developed many [[Dual-use technology|dual-use]] activities, such as "anti-tank projectile" experiments. These involved uranium metal plates being slammed together at a tremendous velocity under controlled conditions, and high-speed diagnostic equipment monitoring the impact while recording temperature and pressure data, which was then fed back into the computer simulation software to improve the accuracy of how a nuclear device would behave during and after detonation.<ref name="ISIS 2018" /> |
The leaders of the program needed very high assurance in the functioning and reliability of any nuclear device they designed, but without the ability to conduct a full-scale [[Nuclear weapons testing|nuclear weapons test]]. Besides the need to keep the program covert, an underground nuclear test was not feasible on such a small and densely populated island such as Taiwan. Therefore the program used specialised computer software to simulate nuclear weapon explosions, the code of which was constantly upgraded and improved as more knowledge was acquired via experiments or by clandestine information gathering. To circumvent detection by foreign intelligence agencies while developing and refining necessary skills, Taiwan developed many [[Dual-use technology|dual-use]] activities, such as "anti-tank projectile" experiments. These involved uranium metal plates being slammed together at a tremendous velocity under controlled conditions, and high-speed diagnostic equipment monitoring the impact while recording temperature and pressure data, which was then fed back into the computer simulation software to improve the accuracy of how a nuclear device would behave during and after detonation.<ref name="ISIS 2018" /> |
||
Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
These tests also allowed the testing of the reliability of the high explosives to be used in warheads and the detonating systems used to ensure the simultaneous triggering of many explosive panels on any [[Nuclear_weapon_design#Implosion-type|implosion type designs]]. As well as enabling relevant data to be gathered and analyzed, these activities allowed Taiwanese technicians to practice daily the skills needed to produce actual warheads (such as the tooling of radioactive metals into individual components) if the order was ever given to begin full scale production of nuclear weapons.<ref name="ISIS 2018" /> |
These tests also allowed the testing of the reliability of the high explosives to be used in warheads and the detonating systems used to ensure the simultaneous triggering of many explosive panels on any [[Nuclear_weapon_design#Implosion-type|implosion type designs]]. As well as enabling relevant data to be gathered and analyzed, these activities allowed Taiwanese technicians to practice daily the skills needed to produce actual warheads (such as the tooling of radioactive metals into individual components) if the order was ever given to begin full scale production of nuclear weapons.<ref name="ISIS 2018" /> |
||
The secret nuclear weapon program was revealed after the [[1987 Lieyu massacre]],<ref>{{cite book|author=Guan Ren-jian|title=<The Taiwan you don't know: Stories of ROC Arm Forces>|url=https://share.readmoo.com/book/1913|publisher=Puomo Digital Publishing |date= 2011-09-01| isbn=9789576636493}}{{in lang|zh-tw}}</ref><ref>{{cite book| |
The secret nuclear weapon program was revealed after the [[1987 Lieyu massacre]],<ref>{{cite book|author=Guan Ren-jian|title=<The Taiwan you don't know: Stories of ROC Arm Forces>|url=https://share.readmoo.com/book/1913|publisher=Puomo Digital Publishing |date= 2011-09-01| isbn=9789576636493}}{{in lang|zh-tw}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author1=Zheng Jing |author2=Cheng Nan-jung |author-link2=Cheng Nan-jung |author3=Ye Xiangzhi |author4=Xu Manqing|title=<Shocking inside story of the Kinmen Military Murder Case>|url=https://m.gamer.com.tw/home/creationDetail.php?sn=3018241 | publisher=Freedom Era Weekly, Ver 175-176|date=1987-06-13}}</ref> when Colonel [[Chang Hsien-yi]] Deputy Director of Nuclear Research at INER,<ref name=sui>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-39252502 |first=Cindy |last=Sui |date=18 May 2017 |title=The man who helped prevent a nuclear crisis |archive-date=5 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210405041050/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-39252502 |work=[[BBC News]] |publisher=[[BBC]] |editor-first=James |editor-last=Harding |editor-link=James Harding (journalist) }}</ref> who was secretly working for the CIA, defected to the U.S. in December 1987 and produced a cache of incriminating documents.<ref>{{cite news|author1-link=Chen Yi-shen|author1=Chen Yi-shen|title=Chang Hsien-yi: I didn't betray Taiwan; I betrayed Hau Pei-tsun|url=http://www.storm.mg/article/208995|access-date=2017-01-08|agency=Storm Media Group|date=2017-01-08}}</ref> General [[Hau Pei-tsun]] claimed that scientists in Taiwan had already produced a controlled nuclear reaction. Under pressure from the U.S., the program was halted. A study into the secret program concluded that at the time of Chang's defection, Taiwan was one or two years away from being able to complete a deliverable weapon.<ref name="auto" /> Chang claims that [[Soong Mei-ling|Madame Chiang Kai Shek]] and military officials loyal to her had expedited the development of nuclear weapons and even set up a parallel chain of command to further their agenda.<ref name=sui /> In 1987 the warhead design had a diameter of 60–70 cm with casing and a weight of 900 kg meaning that further miniaturization would have been needed to optimize the weapon for delivery.<ref name="ISIS 2018" /> |
||
=== Delivery systems === |
=== Delivery systems === |
||
Line 39: | Line 41: | ||
Taiwan theoretically has the potential to develop nuclear weapons from domestic [[monazite]] reserves, and this potential was explored by the military in 1951–1952. However, the monazite's [[thorium]] content was deemed too low to justify recovering, and the military turned to friendly foreign sources instead.<ref>{{cite news |first=George |last=Liao |date=5 June 2019 |title=Business Weekly: A reserve of rare earth minerals keeps Taiwan's hope of developing nuclear weapons alive |url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3718227 |archive-date=5 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190605181946/https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3718227 |work=[[Taiwan News]] }}</ref> |
Taiwan theoretically has the potential to develop nuclear weapons from domestic [[monazite]] reserves, and this potential was explored by the military in 1951–1952. However, the monazite's [[thorium]] content was deemed too low to justify recovering, and the military turned to friendly foreign sources instead.<ref>{{cite news |first=George |last=Liao |date=5 June 2019 |title=Business Weekly: A reserve of rare earth minerals keeps Taiwan's hope of developing nuclear weapons alive |url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3718227 |archive-date=5 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190605181946/https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3718227 |work=[[Taiwan News]] }}</ref> |
||
In light of rising tensions in [[Cross-Strait relations]], especially after [[2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine|Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022]], some have called for Taiwan to arm itself with nuclear weapons, especially commentators in the United States. This is subject to wide debate, with some arguing that nukes could prove a deterrent strong enough to force the mainland to indefinitely postpone an invasion, given that Taiwan is not like Japan and South Korea in that the latter two have treaty-bound security guarantees from the United States, though opponents argue that nukes in themselves are costly, unpopular among the Taiwanese public, and that they themselves would instigate a conflict.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-01-04 |title=A nuclear Taiwan is too terrifying to contemplate |url=https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3162086/nuclear-taiwan-too-terrifying-contemplate |access-date=2022-09-20 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Put Nukes on Taiwan |url=https://www.hoover.org/research/put-nukes-taiwan |access-date=2022-09-20 |publisher=Hoover Institution |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Jacoby |first=Jeff |title=To avoid Ukraine's fate, Taiwan needs nuclear missiles—now |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/03/02/opinion/avoid-ukraines-fate-taiwan-needs-nuclear-missiles-now/ |access-date=2022-09-20 |website=The Boston Globe |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web | |
In light of rising tensions in [[Cross-Strait relations]], especially after [[2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine|Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022]], some have called for Taiwan to arm itself with nuclear weapons, especially commentators in the United States. This is subject to wide debate, with some arguing that nukes could prove a deterrent strong enough to force the mainland to indefinitely postpone an invasion, given that Taiwan is not like Japan and South Korea in that the latter two have treaty-bound security guarantees from the United States, though opponents argue that nukes in themselves are costly, unpopular among the Taiwanese public, and that they themselves would instigate a conflict.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-01-04 |title=A nuclear Taiwan is too terrifying to contemplate |url=https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3162086/nuclear-taiwan-too-terrifying-contemplate |access-date=2022-09-20 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Put Nukes on Taiwan |url=https://www.hoover.org/research/put-nukes-taiwan |access-date=2022-09-20 |publisher=Hoover Institution |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Jacoby |first=Jeff |title=To avoid Ukraine's fate, Taiwan needs nuclear missiles—now |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/03/02/opinion/avoid-ukraines-fate-taiwan-needs-nuclear-missiles-now/ |access-date=2022-09-20 |website=The Boston Globe |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |first1=Bradley |last1=Bowman |first2=Andrea |last2=Stricker |title=Arm Taiwan—but Skip the Nukes |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/04/taiwan-military-aid-nuclear-weapons/ |access-date=2022-09-20 |website=Foreign Policy |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Spencer |first=David |date=2019-04-05 |title=Taiwan has other deterrence options besides costly and controversial nuclear weapons |url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3673904 |work=[[Taiwan News]] |access-date=2022-09-20}}</ref> |
||
== Chemical and biological weapons == |
== Chemical and biological weapons == |
||
Line 59: | Line 61: | ||
* [[China and weapons of mass destruction]] |
* [[China and weapons of mass destruction]] |
||
* [[United States and weapons of mass destruction]] |
* [[United States and weapons of mass destruction]] |
||
* [[History of the Republic of China]] |
|||
* [[Military of the Republic of China]] |
* [[Military of the Republic of China]] |
||
* [[List of states with nuclear weapons]] |
* [[List of states with nuclear weapons]] |
Latest revision as of 02:55, 26 June 2024
Taiwan pursued a number of weapons of mass destruction programs from 1949 to the late 1980s. The final secret nuclear weapons program was shut down in the late 1980s under US pressure after completing all stages of weapons development besides final assembly and testing. Taiwan lacked an effective delivery mechanism and would have needed to further miniaturize any weapon for effective use in combat. Currently, there is no evidence of Taiwan possessing any chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons.[1][2] However, nuclear weapons from the United States were deployed to Taiwan during a period of heightened regional tensions with China beginning with the First Taiwan Strait Crisis and ending in the 1970s.[3][4][5]
Nuclear weapons
[edit]Republic of China | |
---|---|
Nuclear program start date | 1964 (ended in 1988) |
Last nuclear test | Jioupeng Base, Pingtung[6][7] |
Total tests | unknown |
Peak stockpile | None |
Current stockpile | None |
NPT party | Formerly |
During the Cold War, the United States deployed nuclear weapons on Taiwan as part of the United States Taiwan Defense Command. In 1972, United States president Richard Nixon ordered nuclear weapons to be removed from Taiwan and this was implemented by 1974. Nuclear weapons are known to have been stored at Tainan Air Force Base.[4]
Research program
[edit]The development of nuclear weapons by Taiwan has been a contentious issue, as it had been triggered by the People's Republic of China first nuclear test in 1964.[8] The United States, hoping to avoid escalating tensions in the Taiwan Strait, has continually opposed arming Taiwan with nuclear weapons after 1979. Accordingly, Taiwan adheres to the principles of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and has stated that it does not intend to produce nuclear weapons, on an official basis. Past nuclear research by Taiwan makes it a "threshold" nuclear state.[9]
In 1967, a secret nuclear weapons program began under the auspices of the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research (INER) at the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology. Taiwan was able to acquire nuclear technology from abroad (including a research reactor from Canada and low-grade plutonium from the United States) allegedly for a civilian energy system, but in actuality to develop fuel for nuclear weapons.[10] Taiwan bought 100 tons of uranium metal from South Africa which was delivered between 1973 and 1974.[9]
During the 1970s, Taiwan had an active program to produce plutonium using heavy water reactors. However, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) found evidence of Taiwan's efforts to produce weapons-grade plutonium, Taiwan agreed in September 1976 under U.S. pressure to dismantle its nuclear weapons program.[11] [citation needed] A study by the Mitre Corporation in 1977, included Taiwan in a list of "insecure" nuclear threshold states—states with the technical capability to develop nuclear weapons and the security motivations to seriously contemplate such an option. The other states were Israel, South Africa, South Korea, and Yugoslavia.[12][13] U.S. intelligence also believed that Taiwan had designed devices suitable for nuclear testing.[14] In 1980 the Taiwanese contracted for 4,000 tons of uranium metal from South Africa although it is not known how much of this order was ever delivered.[9]
The leaders of the program needed very high assurance in the functioning and reliability of any nuclear device they designed, but without the ability to conduct a full-scale nuclear weapons test. Besides the need to keep the program covert, an underground nuclear test was not feasible on such a small and densely populated island such as Taiwan. Therefore the program used specialised computer software to simulate nuclear weapon explosions, the code of which was constantly upgraded and improved as more knowledge was acquired via experiments or by clandestine information gathering. To circumvent detection by foreign intelligence agencies while developing and refining necessary skills, Taiwan developed many dual-use activities, such as "anti-tank projectile" experiments. These involved uranium metal plates being slammed together at a tremendous velocity under controlled conditions, and high-speed diagnostic equipment monitoring the impact while recording temperature and pressure data, which was then fed back into the computer simulation software to improve the accuracy of how a nuclear device would behave during and after detonation.[9]
These tests also allowed the testing of the reliability of the high explosives to be used in warheads and the detonating systems used to ensure the simultaneous triggering of many explosive panels on any implosion type designs. As well as enabling relevant data to be gathered and analyzed, these activities allowed Taiwanese technicians to practice daily the skills needed to produce actual warheads (such as the tooling of radioactive metals into individual components) if the order was ever given to begin full scale production of nuclear weapons.[9]
The secret nuclear weapon program was revealed after the 1987 Lieyu massacre,[15][16] when Colonel Chang Hsien-yi Deputy Director of Nuclear Research at INER,[17] who was secretly working for the CIA, defected to the U.S. in December 1987 and produced a cache of incriminating documents.[18] General Hau Pei-tsun claimed that scientists in Taiwan had already produced a controlled nuclear reaction. Under pressure from the U.S., the program was halted. A study into the secret program concluded that at the time of Chang's defection, Taiwan was one or two years away from being able to complete a deliverable weapon.[1] Chang claims that Madame Chiang Kai Shek and military officials loyal to her had expedited the development of nuclear weapons and even set up a parallel chain of command to further their agenda.[17] In 1987 the warhead design had a diameter of 60–70 cm with casing and a weight of 900 kg meaning that further miniaturization would have been needed to optimize the weapon for delivery.[9]
Delivery systems
[edit]The Sky Horse ballistic missile system was developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s before a combination of pressure from American President Ronald Reagan and internal competition from anti-ballistic missile development programs ended the program in 1982. Faced with an inability to field their desired delivery system planners turned to alternatives.[9]
The secondary delivery vehicle was the AIDC F-CK-1 Ching-kuo, then in development. Weapons designers at CSIST (now NCSIST) were instructed to design the nuclear weapon to fit within the dimensions of the F-CK-1's centerline drop tank (~50 cm diameter). Modifications to the aircraft would have been required for it to obtain the desired 1,000 km range (especially without the centerline drop tank available). The F-CK-1 would not have been able to fulfill the nuclear strike mission until mid-1989 at the very earliest. Early designs called for an unpowered gravity bomb.[9]
Current status
[edit]Since the end of the nuclear weapons program the “Nuclear Card” has played an important part in Taiwan's relationship with both the United States and China.[19]
During the 1995–1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, then President of Taiwan, Lee Teng-hui, proposed to reactivate the program, but toned down the rhetoric a few days later, saying that although Taiwan was nuclear latent, it "will definitely not" produce nuclear weapons.[20]
There is no evidence that Taiwan possesses any nuclear weapons or any programs to produce them, although it does have the advanced technological ability necessary to develop nuclear weapons as well as the high-tech ability to enrich uranium or process plutonium.[20] Taiwan's nuclear power plants use imported enriched uranium and are subject to IAEA inspections.[9]
Taiwan theoretically has the potential to develop nuclear weapons from domestic monazite reserves, and this potential was explored by the military in 1951–1952. However, the monazite's thorium content was deemed too low to justify recovering, and the military turned to friendly foreign sources instead.[21]
In light of rising tensions in Cross-Strait relations, especially after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, some have called for Taiwan to arm itself with nuclear weapons, especially commentators in the United States. This is subject to wide debate, with some arguing that nukes could prove a deterrent strong enough to force the mainland to indefinitely postpone an invasion, given that Taiwan is not like Japan and South Korea in that the latter two have treaty-bound security guarantees from the United States, though opponents argue that nukes in themselves are costly, unpopular among the Taiwanese public, and that they themselves would instigate a conflict.[22][23][24][25][26]
Chemical and biological weapons
[edit]During the Japanese colonial period a chemical weapons factory was in operation in North Taiwan; the Nationalists took possession of this facility following the conclusion of World War II and are believed to have expanded the facility.[27]
The U.S. Congress was informed in 1989 that Taiwan could have acquired offensive chemical weapons capability, including stockpiles of sarin. The alleged facilities include Tsishan and Kuanhsi. Taiwanese authorities acknowledged only the existence of a defensive research program.[28]
In 1997 the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service assessed that Taiwan did not possess biological weapons but had "shown signs of conducting biological research of an applied military nature.”[27]
There have been rumors of ongoing offensive and defensive Taiwanese biological and chemical weapons programs but no conclusive evidence of development or deployment has ever been presented.[29]
In July 2023, United Daily News (UDN) reported allegations of a meeting between U.S. and Taiwanese officials regarding the creation of a bioweapon lab, which was denied by U.S. and Taiwanese authorities. Radio Free Asia's Asia Fact Check Lab (AFCL) found inconsistencies in the document's language and format, suggesting it was written in mainland Chinese, not Taiwanese style. This apparent disinformation was amplified by pro-China commentators in Taiwan and received widespread coverage in Chinese media.[30][31][32][33]
Ratification of international treaties
[edit]The Republic of China ratified the Geneva Protocol on August 7, 1929, and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1970, and Taiwan considers itself bound by both. Following UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (1971) the United Nations recognizes the People's Republic of China and does not recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state with the legal ability to join international treaties. Because of its controversial political status, Taiwan has not been allowed to join either the Biological Weapons Convention or the Chemical Weapons Convention, but it has stated that it will abide by both treaties nevertheless. In addition, Taiwan has stated that it will continue to abide by the NPT, notwithstanding Resolution 2758.[34] Taiwan was one of the original members of the NPT in 1968. After the People's Republic of China replaced Taiwan at the United Nations in 1971, in effect Taiwan ceased to be active as a participating party to the official NPT activities. However, it signed a trilateral agreement with the United States and the IAEA in 1971 stating that it would continue to abide by the terms of the NPT as a ratification party. While not a member of the IAEA, Taiwan does continue to subscribe to the IAEA safeguards under two agreements, INFCIRC/133 and INFCIRC/158.[35]
See also
[edit]- Japan and weapons of mass destruction
- China and weapons of mass destruction
- United States and weapons of mass destruction
- History of the Republic of China
- Military of the Republic of China
- List of states with nuclear weapons
- Timeline of the Republic of China's nuclear program
References
[edit]- ^ a b Weiner, Tim (20 December 1997). Sulzberger Jr., Arthur Ochs (ed.). "How a Spy Left Taiwan in the Cold". The New York Times. New York City, New York, United States. p. A7. ISSN 0362-4331. OCLC 1645522. Archived from the original on 13 February 2019.
- ^ Fitzpatrick, Mark (2017). "Chapter Three: Taiwan". Asia's Latent Nuclear Powers: Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. London, England, United Kingdom: Routledge. pp. 79–112. doi:10.4324/9781351223744. ISBN 978-1-351-22372-0 – via Google Books.
- ^ norris, Robert S.; Arkin, William M.; Burr, William (1 November 1999). "Where they were" (PDF). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 55 (6). Chicago, Illinois, United States: Taylor & Francis: 26–35. doi:10.2968/055006011. ISSN 0096-3402. LCCN 48034039. OCLC 470268256.
- ^ a b Norris, Robert S.; Arkin, William M.; Burr, William (20 October 1999). "United States Secretly Deployed Nuclear Bombs In 27 Countries and Territories During Cold War". National Security Archive. National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book. No. 20. Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on 7 February 2021.
- ^ Norris, Robert S.; Arkin, William M.; Burr, William (1 November 1999). "Appendix B: Deployments by Country, 1951–1977" (PDF). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 55 (6). Chicago, Illinois, United States: Taylor & Francis: 66–67. Bibcode:1999BuAtS..55f..66N. doi:10.2968/055006019. ISSN 0096-3402. LCCN 48034039. OCLC 470268256.
- ^ "ROC Chief of the General Staff, General Hau Pei-tsun, met the director of American Institute in Taiwan, David Dean in his office after Colonel Chang's defection in 1988. Dean questioned him with the US satellite imagery detecting a minimized nuclear explosion at the Jioupeng military test field in Pingtung in 1986. Hao answered that, after nearly 20 years of research, ROC had successfully produced a controlled nuclear reaction. Hau recorded the statement in his diary and published on the Issue 1 (2000), but was removed from the later re-issues." Hau, Pei-tsun (1 January 2000). Ba nian can mou zong zhang ri ji [8-year Diary of the Chief of the General Staff (1981–1989)] (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Taipei: Commonwealth Publishing. ISBN 9576216389.
- ^ Chen, Wei-ting (21 February 2016). "電文解密 ... 1970年代 美阻我兩波核武發展" [Telegram Decryption ... US Blocked 2 Tides of Nuclear Weapon Development in 1970s]. United Daily News (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 6 May 2016. Retrieved 13 May 2021.
- ^ "1964: China's first atomic bomb explodes". China.org.cn. Retrieved 2017-02-07.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Albright, David; Stricker, Andrea (2018). Taiwans's Former Nuclear Weapons Program: Nuclear Weapons On-Demand (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Institute for Science and International Security. ISBN 978-1-72733-733-4. LCCN 2018910946. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 January 2022.
- ^ Roy, Denny (2003). Taiwan: A Political History. Ithaca, New York, United States: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-4070-0. LCCN 2002012235. OCLC 2002012235 – via Archive.org.
- ^ Ide, William (14 October 1999). "How the US stopped Taiwan's bomb". Local News. Taipei Times. Taipei, Taiwan: The Liberty Times group. p. 3. ISSN 1563-9525. Archived from the original on 7 October 2019.
- ^ Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group (1977). Keeny, Spurgeon M. Jr. (ed.). Nuclear Power Issues and Choices: Report of the Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group (Independent panel report). Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: Ballinger Publishing Company/Mitre Corporation/Ford Foundation. p. 284. ISBN 978-0-88410-065-2. OCLC 2799099.
- ^ Barton, John H. (1 March 1979). "Nuclear Power: Issues and Choices. Report of the Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group. (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1977. Pp. xvii + 418. $16.50, cloth; $6.95, paper.)". American Political Science Review. 73 (1). Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association/Cambridge University Press: 349–350. doi:10.2307/1954874. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 00030554. LCCN 08009025. OCLC 805068983. S2CID 146895629.
- ^ National Intelligence Officer for Nuclear Proliferation (25 January 1980). The 22 September 1979 Event (PDF). National Security Council/National Foreign Intelligence Board/Interagency Intelligence Working Group on Nuclear Proliferation (Interagency intelligence memorandum). Washington, D.C.: United States Intelligence Community/United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. p. 5. MORI DocID: 1108245. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 February 2021 – via National Security Archive.
- ^ Guan Ren-jian (2011-09-01). <The Taiwan you don't know: Stories of ROC Arm Forces>. Puomo Digital Publishing. ISBN 9789576636493.(in Chinese)
- ^ Zheng Jing; Cheng Nan-jung; Ye Xiangzhi; Xu Manqing (1987-06-13). <Shocking inside story of the Kinmen Military Murder Case>. Freedom Era Weekly, Ver 175-176.
- ^ a b Sui, Cindy (18 May 2017). Harding, James (ed.). "The man who helped prevent a nuclear crisis". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on 5 April 2021.
- ^ Chen Yi-shen (2017-01-08). "Chang Hsien-yi: I didn't betray Taiwan; I betrayed Hau Pei-tsun". Storm Media Group. Retrieved 2017-01-08.
- ^ Segal, Gerald (5 August 1998). "Taiwan's nuclear card". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. OCLC 781541372. Archived from the original on 16 November 2021.
- ^ a b Albright, David; Gay, Corey (1 January 1998). "Taiwan: Nuclear nightmare averted". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 54 (1): 54–60. Bibcode:1998BuAtS..54a..54A. doi:10.1080/00963402.1998.11456811. ISSN 0096-3402. LCCN 48034039. OCLC 470268256.
- ^ Liao, George (5 June 2019). "Business Weekly: A reserve of rare earth minerals keeps Taiwan's hope of developing nuclear weapons alive". Taiwan News. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019.
- ^ "A nuclear Taiwan is too terrifying to contemplate". South China Morning Post. 2022-01-04. Retrieved 2022-09-20.
- ^ "Put Nukes on Taiwan". Hoover Institution. Retrieved 2022-09-20.
- ^ Jacoby, Jeff. "To avoid Ukraine's fate, Taiwan needs nuclear missiles—now". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2022-09-20.
- ^ Bowman, Bradley; Stricker, Andrea. "Arm Taiwan—but Skip the Nukes". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 2022-09-20.
- ^ Spencer, David (2019-04-05). "Taiwan has other deterrence options besides costly and controversial nuclear weapons". Taiwan News. Retrieved 2022-09-20.
- ^ a b Minnick, Wendell (11 August 2001). "Taiwan still haunted by stories of secret arms". Editorials. Taipei Times. Taipei, Taiwan: The Liberty Times group. p. 8. ISSN 1563-9525. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021.
- ^ NTI: country profile Taiwan Archived November 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "TAIWAN". www.nti.org. Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved 27 September 2020.
- ^ Officials link biological weapons story to China, Taipei Times, 13 July 2023.
- ^ Taiwan’s new biosafety lab to counter – not develop – bioweapons, defence ministry says, SCMP, 15 July 2023.
- ^ Did the US ask Taiwan to develop a bioweapon targeting Chinese DNA?, Radio Free Asia, 1 August 2023.
- ^ China is flooding Taiwan with disinformation, The Economist, 26 September 2023.
- ^ "China: Accession to Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. New York City, New York, United States: United Nations. 17 March 1992.
- ^ "Spreadsheet" (PDF). www.nti.org.