Jump to content

Talk:Abdala (vaccine): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Beebah dooba - "→‎Question about source of this statement: new section"
Assessment: banner shell, COVID-19, Medicine, Pharmacology, Cuba (Low) (Rater)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject COVID-19 |class=Start |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject COVID-19 |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Cuba}}
{{WikiProject Cuba |importance=Low}}
}}
}}
{{annual readership}}
{{annual readership}}
Line 10: Line 10:


I just was wondering what the source for the statement "on May 1, 97% of the original participants had received their 3 doses, the others 3% were lost in the process" was, and also what that statement means exactly. I am not positive who added that bit. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Beebah dooba|Beebah dooba]] ([[User talk:Beebah dooba#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Beebah dooba|contribs]]) 02:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I just was wondering what the source for the statement "on May 1, 97% of the original participants had received their 3 doses, the others 3% were lost in the process" was, and also what that statement means exactly. I am not positive who added that bit. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Beebah dooba|Beebah dooba]] ([[User talk:Beebah dooba#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Beebah dooba|contribs]]) 02:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

It's me that added this part but essentially of the original participants that received their first dose, 97% received their 3rd doses while 3% didn't.
--[[User:Tech-ScienceAddict|Tech-ScienceAddict]] ([[User talk:Tech-ScienceAddict|talk]]) 13:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


== Please describe your changes==
Recently, a part saying results weren't released to the public has been removed. No justification. I will reput it in a better writen way but please justify your changes.
--[[User:Tech-ScienceAddict|Tech-ScienceAddict]] ([[User talk:Tech-ScienceAddict|talk]]) 13:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:18, 30 January 2024

Question about source of this statement

[edit]

I just was wondering what the source for the statement "on May 1, 97% of the original participants had received their 3 doses, the others 3% were lost in the process" was, and also what that statement means exactly. I am not positive who added that bit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beebah dooba (talkcontribs) 02:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's me that added this part but essentially of the original participants that received their first dose, 97% received their 3rd doses while 3% didn't.
--Tech-ScienceAddict (talk) 13:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Please describe your changes

[edit]

Recently, a part saying results weren't released to the public has been removed. No justification. I will reput it in a better writen way but please justify your changes. --Tech-ScienceAddict (talk) 13:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]