Jump to content

Talk:Armistice of Belgrade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Armistice of Belgrade/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tomobe03! I'll be reviewing this and the other two articles due to the ongoing GAN backlog. I will start the review a bit later. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments

General

  • Remove unused parameters from the infobox.
  • Typo: "...and the Chechoslovak envoy..." → "...and the Czechoslovak envoy...
  • Rest of the text is well-written, no errors.

Images

  • All are alright.

Sources

  • All are alright.

On hold until these minor errors get fixed. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking at this. I've addressed the above issues.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]