Talk:Balangoda Man: Difference between revisions
→First draft of a complete rewrite: new section |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|23:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Ldesilva|Ldesilva]] ([[User talk:Ldesilva|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=|status=|note=}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Sri Lanka|class=Start|importance=Top}} |
{{WikiProject Sri Lanka|class=Start|importance=Top}} |
Revision as of 23:13, 3 December 2013
Balangoda Man is currently a good article nominee. Nominated by Ldesilva (talk) at 23:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
NPOV
vandalism by lionlanka "It is not determined which languages these tribes spoke, but the general consensus is that they were using a tamil dialect due to the widespread usage of the classical language at the time." -Lionlanka please provide relevant sources .which scinetist proof early sri lankans spoke tamil dialects. i am not wonder if you said tribes were in Nile were used Tamil dialects !.please discuss it here Eeriyaka (talk) 23:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
First draft of a complete rewrite
Hi all,
First of all: excellent initiative to start this article! In my opinion it is an extremely important subject. I have spent almost 2 weeks reading all the references in the original article and finding new credible sources from top journals and researchers working in the field. I have kept all the references in the original article and also the original content/facts as much as possible, except where the associated citations were not credible (e.g. there was reference to a newspaper article which was claiming 37,000 BP for the skeletal remains, but this newspaper story seemed to be claiming too much too early, and I could not find any associated journal/conference scientific publication). But I have kept some of the old text commented out until we find credible references - so when you view the latest source text of the article you will see some commented out text.
The version I have uploaded is only a first draft; it would be great if we can get it into GA quality. And I think that with just a bit more work we will get there.
Best regards, Ldesilva (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- Good article nominees without a subtopic
- Start-Class Sri Lanka articles
- Top-importance Sri Lanka articles
- WikiProject Sri Lanka articles
- Stub-Class Archaeology articles
- Low-importance Archaeology articles
- Unassessed Anthropology articles
- Unknown-importance Anthropology articles