Talk:Big Brother (British TV series) series 4
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(From nominations table article)
Is this article really necessary?
- Should be merged with BB4 Article. Bswee 11:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Jon's colour
It shouldn't be the same as Cameron's nominations from Africa because it looks like it means the same thing. Different things should have different colours. Can someone make it something different? I don't know enough about colours on here. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeh I know. Can you tell me a colour and I'll get the code for it? godgoddingham333 18:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Dunno. Something light? -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Like? It can't be grey -that's for no nominations. Blue for banned. Green for secret house etc. Yellow for exempt/final. Red for evicted. Pink for walked. Purple for ejected. Orange maybe?? godgoddingham333 18:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- I was thinking perhaps a light blue, different to the banned blue, which I always saw as more of a purple anyway. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- How now? godgoddingham333 18:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- That's good. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- How now? godgoddingham333 18:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- I was thinking perhaps a light blue, different to the banned blue, which I always saw as more of a purple anyway. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Like? It can't be grey -that's for no nominations. Blue for banned. Green for secret house etc. Yellow for exempt/final. Red for evicted. Pink for walked. Purple for ejected. Orange maybe?? godgoddingham333 18:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Dunno. Something light? -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Big Brother UK 4 logo.gif
Image:Big Brother UK 4 logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Gaetano Kagwa
Shouldnt he be in the Info box even in a different colour as a guest? He was the Bloke from Africa
- Nope and Cameron shouldn't be in BB1 Africa's infobox. Neither Cameron or Gaetano had any game related impact on the series they were visiting. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Upgraded to C-Class
I have upgraded this article to C-Class as it meets the criteria, the article has a good amount of information but not enough yet for B-Class. More reliable sources would be good to improve the article. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Where are the tasks?
Where are all the tasks they had to complete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.62.20 (talk) 11:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Why not include the return vote?
I added some good information to this article and it just gets deleted. What's the big deal? Livin'InAGhostTown (talk) 22:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- The return vote is not necessary since it was the public who voted him back in not the housemates --MSalmon (talk) 11:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- But even if there are no nominations, and if it's just the public's choice it gets included in the table, I think there should be more of a discussion on this rather than just individual opinions. Livin'InAGhostTown (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's a nominations table, if it doesn't effect nominations or an eviction in any way then it shouldn't be given it's own column. --RachelRice (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- That is correct, if it had been the housemates choice then it should be included but since it wasn't then it is fine as it is. --MSalmon (talk) 21:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's a nominations table, if it doesn't effect nominations or an eviction in any way then it shouldn't be given it's own column. --RachelRice (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- But even if there are no nominations, and if it's just the public's choice it gets included in the table, I think there should be more of a discussion on this rather than just individual opinions. Livin'InAGhostTown (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Big Brother 4 (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080624222736/http://www.smeggys.co.uk/big_brother_housemate_library.php to http://www.smeggys.co.uk/big_brother_housemate_library.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Celebrity Big Brother 1 (U.S.) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:22, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Big Brother 1 (UK) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class British television articles
- Unknown-importance British television articles
- British television task force articles
- Start-Class Episode coverage articles
- Low-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- Start-Class Reality television articles
- Unknown-importance Reality television articles
- Reality television task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class Big Brother articles
- High-importance Big Brother articles
- WikiProject Big Brother articles