Talk:Borough of Queenscliffe: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Tim O'Leary (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
{{WP Australia}} |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WP Australia}} |
|||
Whilst dear old Queenscliffe is an anomoly it's hardly likely that it had more Liberal heavies than say, Prahran, Kew, Camberwell, Hawthorn and almost anywhere else. To suggest that Kennett (or anyone for that matter) would be looking to be Mayor of 2,300 people at some vague time in the future is stretching credibility a bit. Premier of Victoria with 4 million people and billions of $, but really wants to be Mayor of 2,000 people and with no money? |
Whilst dear old Queenscliffe is an anomoly it's hardly likely that it had more Liberal heavies than say, Prahran, Kew, Camberwell, Hawthorn and almost anywhere else. To suggest that Kennett (or anyone for that matter) would be looking to be Mayor of 2,300 people at some vague time in the future is stretching credibility a bit. Premier of Victoria with 4 million people and billions of $, but really wants to be Mayor of 2,000 people and with no money? |
Revision as of 04:55, 9 July 2006
Australia Unassessed | ||||||||||||||||
|
Whilst dear old Queenscliffe is an anomoly it's hardly likely that it had more Liberal heavies than say, Prahran, Kew, Camberwell, Hawthorn and almost anywhere else. To suggest that Kennett (or anyone for that matter) would be looking to be Mayor of 2,300 people at some vague time in the future is stretching credibility a bit. Premier of Victoria with 4 million people and billions of $, but really wants to be Mayor of 2,000 people and with no money?