Talk:Cuddle party: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:32, 21 February 2007

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 October 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cuddle party article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

I have permission to post the cuddle party entry. Please contact [email protected] or [email protected] for verification. They know me by nick Jade (short for Jadxia) Patten.

non-sexual

To state that cuddle parties are non-sexual is, in my opinion, POV. I'm slightly modifying the first few sentences in an attempt to make them NPOV without sacrificing information. --Allen 05:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-sexual is the rule, therefore I put "non-sexual" after "encouraged to"; this allows for the possibilty that participants and others view the interactions as sexual.--Patrick 11:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right; that's best. Thanks. --Allen 14:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

REiD?

"REiD Mihalko and Marcia Baczynski founded the organization..." Is this just a typo, or is REiD some acronym I'm not familiar with? --x-Flare-x 13:36, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Puppy Pile" and other discussions

A Puppy Pile is a derogatory term. if there is to be a merger, it should be based on the elimination of reference or association between cuddle party and puppy pile. people arent dogs.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by VForVendetta (talk • contribs) 08:06, 2006 March 21 (UTC)

Hi V - thanks for discussing here. I'm not completely familiar with any association between the two terms - I need to do a little research, which will probably take me about 2 days or so to get around to. I will also look into why the Merge template was added, as I'm not familiar with all the history. Welcome to Wikipedia. Johntex\^talk 16:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi V - I've looked into it and I disagree. If you Google "cuddle party"+"puppy pile", the very first link[1] is cuddleparty.com and they use the term puppy pile in a non-derogatory manner to refer to something that may happen at a cuddel party. Johntex\^talk 21:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Neutrality Tag

No one has made any explanation here of why the Neutrality tag was added. Therefore, I am removing it. Before adding again, please discuss here. Johntex\^talk 22:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

If no one has any objections, I am going to merge the puppy pile stuff over to here and create a redirect there. It seems that the two words mean the same thing, but that "cuddle party" is the preferred (standard) term. Turly-burly 11:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No objections here. Suggest a small note be added to the article pointing out what a 'puppy pile' is, once puppy pile is merged into this one. See cuddleparty.com definition & User:Johntex's comment that it's a sub-event of a cuddle party.

no mention whatsoever of a puppy pile anywhere in the article now... Mathmo ^Talk 03:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this is the gayest shit i've ever heard.

Joeyramoney 01:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 : No objections here. Suggest a small note be added to the article pointing out ''what'' a 'puppy pile' is, once [[puppy pile]] is merged into this one. See cuddleparty.com definition & [[User:Johntex]]'s comment that it's a sub-event of a cuddle party.
 :no mention whatsoever of a puppy pile anywhere in the article now... [[User:Mathmo|Mathmo]] <sup>[[User talk:Mathmo|Talk]]</sup> 03:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
+== this is the gayest shit i've ever heard. ==
+[[User:Joeyramoney|Joeyramoney]] 01:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)