Jump to content

Talk:Caitlin Clark/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
m Archive batch
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tan}}
{{tan}}

==GA Review==
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. [[User:Riley1012|Riley1012]] ([[User talk:Riley1012|talk]]) 14:40, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Caitlin Clark/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Caitlin Clark/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>

'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Riley1012|Riley1012]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Riley1012|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Riley1012|contribs]]) 20:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
Hi {{u|Sportzeditz}}. I will review this within a week. -[[User:Riley1012|Riley1012]] ([[User talk:Riley1012|talk]]) 20:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" align="center"
|- align="center"
| style="border: 1px solid #BBB;" width="775pt" | '''[[WP:GAN|Good Article]] review progress box'''
{|
|-
| '''[[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Criteria]]:'''<!--
--> 1a. '''prose ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 1b. '''[[MOS:|MoS]] ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 2a. '''[[MOS:NOTES|ref layout]] ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 2b. '''cites [[WP:RS]] ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 2c. '''no [[WP:OR]] ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 2d. '''no [[WP:CV]] ({{GAList/check| y}})'''
|-
|
|- align="center"
|<!--
--> 3a. '''broadness ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 3b. '''focus ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 4. '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral]] ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 5. '''[[WP:EW|stable]] ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 6a. '''[[WP:IUP|free or tagged images]] ({{GAList/check| y}})'''<!--
--> 6b. '''pics relevant ({{GAList/check| y}})'''
|-
| <small><em>Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the [[WP:GACR|Good Article criteria]]. Criteria marked [[Image:Symbol comment 2.png|14px]] are unassessed</em></small>
|}
|}
'''1. Well-written'''
<br> The article complies with MoS. The prose overall is excellent. Here are a few grammar corrections:
* In the "High school career" section, the mentions of first-team and second-team selections need to be hyphenated (first-team instead of first team), as they are in the "College career" section.
* "...Clark started on the school's varsity soccer team, but focused on basketball for her final two years." The comma after team either needs to be removed, or you need to add "she" after the word "but"
* "...the first Division I men's or women's player to record consecutive triple-doubles with at least 30 points, and the first women's player..." The comma before "and" should be removed.
* "...and was named tournament most outstanding player (MOP)..." This should be reworded to either "the tournament's most outstanding player" or "the most outstanding player of the tournament"
* "...the AP preseason All-America team, and was named Big Ten preseason player of the year..." The comma should either be removed, or the work "she" should be added after "and"
* "Entering her junior season at Iowa, Clark signed a deal with Nike." Add another word before entering like "when" or "while" to make the phrasing less awkward.
'''3. Broad'''
<br> The article is broad in its coverage

'''4. Neutral'''
<br> The article is neutral. The discussion of the Angel Reese gesture is particularly well done in terms of neutrality considering the controversy.

'''5. Stable'''
<br> This article is stable day-to-day

'''6. Illustrated'''
<br> The four images in the article are free and have relevant captions

'''2. Verifiable'''
<br> [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Caitlin+Clark&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Earwig Copyvio check] is fine.
* "Listed at 6 feet 0 inches (1.83 m), Clark plays point guard and has great size for her position." Is there a source for her height? Also it would be helpful to have more context/elaboration on what "great size for her position" means.
<br> I will take a closer look at the sources and finish criteria #2 later. -[[User:Riley1012|Riley1012]] ([[User talk:Riley1012|talk]]) 21:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
:{{re|Riley1012}} I have addressed all of the issues so far. [[User:Sportzeditz|Sportzeditz]] ([[User talk:Sportzeditz|talk]]) 01:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
:: Thanks {{u|Sportzeditz}}. Here's the rest of the review: Ref layout is good. No copyright issues found in source check. No original research. The only issue I found was that reference 1 was a dead URL, but I fixed that. This article is ready to be promoted to GA. -[[User:Riley1012|Riley1012]] ([[User talk:Riley1012|talk]]) 14:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
{{abot}}



== Maravich Apologetics ==
== Maravich Apologetics ==

Revision as of 19:55, 6 July 2024

Archive 1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 20:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sportzeditz. I will review this within a week. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written
The article complies with MoS. The prose overall is excellent. Here are a few grammar corrections:

  • In the "High school career" section, the mentions of first-team and second-team selections need to be hyphenated (first-team instead of first team), as they are in the "College career" section.
  • "...Clark started on the school's varsity soccer team, but focused on basketball for her final two years." The comma after team either needs to be removed, or you need to add "she" after the word "but"
  • "...the first Division I men's or women's player to record consecutive triple-doubles with at least 30 points, and the first women's player..." The comma before "and" should be removed.
  • "...and was named tournament most outstanding player (MOP)..." This should be reworded to either "the tournament's most outstanding player" or "the most outstanding player of the tournament"
  • "...the AP preseason All-America team, and was named Big Ten preseason player of the year..." The comma should either be removed, or the work "she" should be added after "and"
  • "Entering her junior season at Iowa, Clark signed a deal with Nike." Add another word before entering like "when" or "while" to make the phrasing less awkward.

3. Broad
The article is broad in its coverage

4. Neutral
The article is neutral. The discussion of the Angel Reese gesture is particularly well done in terms of neutrality considering the controversy.

5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day

6. Illustrated
The four images in the article are free and have relevant captions

2. Verifiable
Earwig Copyvio check is fine.

  • "Listed at 6 feet 0 inches (1.83 m), Clark plays point guard and has great size for her position." Is there a source for her height? Also it would be helpful to have more context/elaboration on what "great size for her position" means.


I will take a closer look at the sources and finish criteria #2 later. -Riley1012 (talk) 21:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

@Riley1012: I have addressed all of the issues so far. Sportzeditz (talk) 01:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks Sportzeditz. Here's the rest of the review: Ref layout is good. No copyright issues found in source check. No original research. The only issue I found was that reference 1 was a dead URL, but I fixed that. This article is ready to be promoted to GA. -Riley1012 (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Maravich Apologetics

I feel like the second paragraph of the introduction is odd in this context. This article is about Caitlin Clark's career, not how Pete Maravich's career stats could have been different in the modern NCAA.

I propose this paragraph either be moved to Pete Maravich, or at the very least placed into a subsection below the Career Statistics section, something like "Comparisons with Pete Maravich". 38.43.21.137 (talk) 13:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

You can't compare Pete Maravich and Caitlin Ckark. Clark has played one more season (4) than Maravich'3 (Freshmen were not eligible in Maravich's era. Clark also has a career 506 3 PT shots, Maravich has 0; as the 3 PT shot was not around. Subtracting 506 extra pts for the three PT shots and one entire season; Ms. Clark is around 1300 pts shy of "Pistol" Pete. While her accomplishment is impressive; when all factors are considered; it is in fact an Asterisk worthy record. You cannot compare apples to oranges. 2600:1700:80D8:A0:AD2C:AE37:CA38:EBBA (talk) 19:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)