Jump to content

Talk:Codes for constructed languages: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Languages}}, {{WP conlangs}}.
 
Line 24: Line 24:
:{{corrected}} --[[User:Jonah.ru|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah.ru|talk]]) 07:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
:{{corrected}} --[[User:Jonah.ru|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah.ru|talk]]) 07:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== artificial extension ==


"art-x-solresol" is the usage example for that format, but would a two-word name also be run together like that? The [https://www.kreativekorp.com/clcr/ ConLang Code Registry] seems to do it that way. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo James Barnes]] 03:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on [[Codes for constructed languages]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=794808144 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080602142554/http://linguistlist.org/forms/langs/get-familyid.cfm?CFTREEITEMKEY=AE to http://linguistlist.org/forms/langs/get-familyid.cfm?CFTREEITEMKEY=AE

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 05:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


== simple tag ==
== simple tag ==

Latest revision as of 03:20, 10 June 2024

ISO 15924?[edit]

As in Blissymbol...

Also, {{Infobox language}} should be checked / expanded to support this, and the table also.

Are all the languages listed coded properly on their wiki page? Sai Emrys ¿? 19:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ISO 15924 is for scripts rather than languages, so it isn't appropriate to add it to the table. (Blissymbols is a script as well as a language.) I haven't checked all the articles for correctness. --Zundark 20:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do any of the other languages listed have strongly associated scripts that have codes? I think it's worth adding, perhaps with a note explaining that one set of codes are for the language itself, and the other for the script. Sai Emrys ¿? 23:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Europanto[edit]

I propose to delete the line referring to Europanto since the associated code elements are no longer valid. Doug Ewell 19:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DougEwell (talkcontribs)

Broken link[edit]

ISO 639 code tables on the website of the ISO 639-3 Registration AuthorityBluethailand (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed --Jonah (talk) 07:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

artificial extension[edit]

"art-x-solresol" is the usage example for that format, but would a two-word name also be run together like that? The ConLang Code Registry seems to do it that way. Arlo James Barnes 03:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

simple tag[edit]

Much as I would like to have it, I could not find any evidence on a sublanguage "simple" in BCP 47 (rfc4647/rfc5646). I think that statement should be removed - unless a reference can be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wanenc (talkcontribs) 2021-06-01 (UTC)

For BCP 47 subtags it's necessary to check the Language Subtag Registry to determine the official status. And simple is indeed listed there as a variant subtag meaning "simplified form". --Zundark (talk) 08:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]