Talk:CDC (disambiguation): Difference between revisions
m →Adding "CDC: Cloud Data Center": spelling fixes |
→Move & rename: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Mjdtjm|Mjdtjm]]:</span> Views have evolved over the past decade. It's generally preferred to have the article in place before adding the title to disambiguation pages. See [[WP:Write the article first]]. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 13:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC) |
:<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Mjdtjm|Mjdtjm]]:</span> Views have evolved over the past decade. It's generally preferred to have the article in place before adding the title to disambiguation pages. See [[WP:Write the article first]]. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 13:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC) |
||
: The manual of style for diambiguation pages, [[MOS:DAB]], states that every entry must have exactly one blue link and that article must provide information about what we are diambiguating, in this case CDC. I have searched to find an article that we can link to that discusses cloud data centers but have come up empty. If there is a page that discusses them that I have not found then we can create an entry but until we do or someone creates an article it does not belong on this page. [[:en:User talk:GB fan|~ GB fan]] 21:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) |
: The manual of style for diambiguation pages, [[MOS:DAB]], states that every entry must have exactly one blue link and that article must provide information about what we are diambiguating, in this case CDC. I have searched to find an article that we can link to that discusses cloud data centers but have come up empty. If there is a page that discusses them that I have not found then we can create an entry but until we do or someone creates an article it does not belong on this page. [[:en:User talk:GB fan|~ GB fan]] 21:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) |
||
== Move & rename == |
|||
(US Fed'l) "Ctrs for Dis Ctrl" (primary topic) should be target of Rdr CDC, and should in turn have a Rdr'n hatnote to the accompanying "(Dab'n)"-suffixed prcd'g Dab page. (Check to see if this existing talk pg might need to be broken up, or just renamed in A different direction from the accompanying main-namespace page: if you can open several windows on the same screen, you can easily work this out better than my addled senior brain and single-window iPad II can.) [[User:Jerzy|Jerzy]]•[[User talk:Jerzy|t]] 00:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:16, 10 March 2019
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Java Disambig‑class | |||||||
|
edit request
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at A. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Please add
- Anne Casimir Pyrame de Candolle (1836-1918) aka C.DC.
because C.DC. redirects there. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 03:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 11:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Adding "CDC: Cloud Data Center"
I add the following discussion to prevent a "revert war" on this page!
Unfortunately "GB fan" insists on inhibiting my new entry "CDC: Cloud Data Center" due to its red link. As it could be seen in history, [s]he asserts that: "All entries on disambiguation pages must include a blue link where someone can find information no red link only entries". But I think: "Adding Red Links is a motivator for completing the article/page. It's better to help to create new article about Cloud Data Centers instead of removing the new entry".
On the other hand, on the 1st paragraph of page Wikipedia:Red link we see: "It is useful while editing articles to add a red link to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because the subject is notable and verifiable. A study conducted in 2008 showed that red links helped Wikipedia grow.[1] Follow-up work on this indicated that the creation of red links prevents new pages from being orphaned from the start.[2]"
What's your idea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjdtjm (talk • contribs) 13:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Mjdtjm: Views have evolved over the past decade. It's generally preferred to have the article in place before adding the title to disambiguation pages. See WP:Write the article first. —C.Fred (talk) 13:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- The manual of style for diambiguation pages, MOS:DAB, states that every entry must have exactly one blue link and that article must provide information about what we are diambiguating, in this case CDC. I have searched to find an article that we can link to that discusses cloud data centers but have come up empty. If there is a page that discusses them that I have not found then we can create an entry but until we do or someone creates an article it does not belong on this page. ~ GB fan 21:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Move & rename
(US Fed'l) "Ctrs for Dis Ctrl" (primary topic) should be target of Rdr CDC, and should in turn have a Rdr'n hatnote to the accompanying "(Dab'n)"-suffixed prcd'g Dab page. (Check to see if this existing talk pg might need to be broken up, or just renamed in A different direction from the accompanying main-namespace page: if you can open several windows on the same screen, you can easily work this out better than my addled senior brain and single-window iPad II can.) Jerzy•t 00:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)