Jump to content

Talk:Dave Brat: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Founders of USA: new section
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Undid revision 1213090634 by 206.176.213.184 (talk)
 
Line 39: Line 39:


Everybody savvy realizes that PoliFact has a pro-Democrat viewpoint. It should not be cited, particularly when the main thrust of this article is anti-Brat. Even though Wikipedia tends to favor Democrats, there should be an attempt with articles like this to seeme neutral. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.49.27.38|216.49.27.38]] ([[User talk:216.49.27.38#top|talk]]) 14:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Everybody savvy realizes that PoliFact has a pro-Democrat viewpoint. It should not be cited, particularly when the main thrust of this article is anti-Brat. Even though Wikipedia tends to favor Democrats, there should be an attempt with articles like this to seeme neutral. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.49.27.38|216.49.27.38]] ([[User talk:216.49.27.38#top|talk]]) 14:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Founders of USA ==

Founding Fathers beliefs in God [[Special:Contributions/206.176.213.184|206.176.213.184]] ([[User talk:206.176.213.184|talk]]) 02:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:32, 11 March 2024


Princeton Theological Seminary

[edit]

The Education component in the sidebar still has Princeton Univ identified (and linked) as a source of Rep Brat's M.Div. (I don't bother editing since everything gets reverted anyway.) ConradArchguy (talk) 01:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Random footnotes, please post new material ABOVE this section

[edit]

Citing PoliFact

[edit]

Everybody savvy realizes that PoliFact has a pro-Democrat viewpoint. It should not be cited, particularly when the main thrust of this article is anti-Brat. Even though Wikipedia tends to favor Democrats, there should be an attempt with articles like this to seeme neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.49.27.38 (talk) 14:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]