Talk:Diana Panchenko: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→BLP Violation: Reply |
→BLP Violation: fix |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:It's a controversial website, of course, but as long as the information is true... For me, it's not mentioning its polemical positions in the introduction (to which she owes her notability) which is non-neutral. [[User:DarkVador79-UA|DarkVador79-UA]] ([[User talk:DarkVador79-UA|talk]]) 16:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
:It's a controversial website, of course, but as long as the information is true... For me, it's not mentioning its polemical positions in the introduction (to which she owes her notability) which is non-neutral. [[User:DarkVador79-UA|DarkVador79-UA]] ([[User talk:DarkVador79-UA|talk]]) 16:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
::I think we cannot accept a source that talks about a |
::I think we cannot accept a source that talks about a woman threatening her by inserting her image in a lake of blood, even if it is telling the truth. [[User:Mhorg|Mhorg]] ([[User talk:Mhorg|talk]]) 17:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:51, 5 June 2024
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BLP Violation
The entire article was written using the chesno.org website dozens of times, on which her picture in blood and the words "Member of the Register of Traitors" stand.[1] I think it is unacceptable. Mhorg (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's a controversial website, of course, but as long as the information is true... For me, it's not mentioning its polemical positions in the introduction (to which she owes her notability) which is non-neutral. DarkVador79-UA (talk) 16:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think we cannot accept a source that talks about a woman threatening her by inserting her image in a lake of blood, even if it is telling the truth. Mhorg (talk) 17:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)