Talk:Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God: Difference between revisions
changing signature as part of vanish using AWB |
No edit summary |
||
Line 56:
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 08:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
== characters ==
How can the characters be under level 10; one of them has teleport! Characters under level 10 against liches just die; no argument, just die.
|
Revision as of 00:11, 15 April 2008
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Film Start‑class | |||||||
|
Merging with another article?
This article should be merged with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeons_and_Dragons:_Wrath_of_the_Dragon_God
But I'm unsure of which title would be preferred. Any suggestions? Besides burning both movies, which sadly, we can't do. FrozenPurpleCube 03:42, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- I looked around a little, and saw that both Warner Bros (the studio behind this one) and IMDb listed it as D&D: WotDG, while the home page of this title at the Sci-fi Channel was D&D2: WotDG. But that could be just a fancy title text, and a mistake by the designer/webmaster, or simply to highlight that it's the sequel. I'd rather bet on the Warner Bros and IMDb pages, but because it still conflicts with Sci-fi Channels's and I'm not 100% sure, and Dungeons and Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God isn't linked to by anything on Wikipedia, and this one at least a bunch of articles, I may just merge that one for now with this until that's sorted out if anyone cares. :-) -- Jugalator 03:49, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
For info, the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeons_and_Dragons:_Wrath_of_the_Dragon_God does not exist anymore as a single article, and leads now to the article of this discussion. Paercebal 08:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Article is partial?
"Gamers will also be happy to see that the spells are not cast at will" - Oh will I now? I didn't think it was Wikipedia's purpose to tell me how I WILL react to something, just to tell me that the thing exists. --Charax 22:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. avid gamer? an aggressive white dragon? dead drow? Special mention must be given to Klaxx the Malign? Why is this article enumerating background, useless, unrealistic (even in a fantasy setting) and/or senseless facts. Let's see my own fresh account of the unforgettable scene with the mighty Klaxx :
There is a forest that is a necropolis where a bored but ecology-aware lich liking to climb down trees likes to wait for adventurers to play stupid pranks on them. Hopefully, the eyefull lich (liches are supposed to have bright red pinpoint in their empty sockets, not eyes) is bored and despite appearing quite young (an healthy zombie more than a mommified corpse, I'd say, but my necrology skills could fail me on this one), is out of shape enough to let a party of middle level adventurer flee on a river raft......
WTF?...
I guess the article IS TERRIBLY biased toward the movie. It should perhaps be written in a more neutral way. Paercebal 09:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Spoiler info, wrong?
I just saw the movie and came lookign for any information I might of missed during its presentation. The spoiler stats that Damodar escaped from the Nine Hells of Baator but I dont recollect seeying him in hell.
Black dragon
I chopped this as it is obviously written by two different people and reads like a forum discussion. Can the two arguments be synthesised and re-included?
- Despite this, there were a few changes that conflicted with the D&D game. Among these are the black dragon's depiction. In the game, black dragons are a subtype of dragon that are associated with water and evil, they live in marshes made poisonous by their corrupt water spell-like ability, and their breath is acidic. In the movie, the black dragon breathes fire and is never shown anywhere near a swamp. Though in the beginning it is seen breathing acidic poisonous gas, and is entombed in a mountain. It is not a normal black dragon, but a dragon god, and therefore is probably equipped with several types of breath weapons like the regular metallic dragons.
Ashmoo 06:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Search for better image
I wonder if a better screenshot could be found to illustrate this artice. The one we have is rather grainy. --Agamemnon2 16:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Falazure vs. Faluzure
I fixed the link, but the source article "Faluzure" is wrong. It should be "Falazure". Web Warlock 23:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Infobox
The IMDB article lists twelve producers. Should all of them be added to the infobox? If not, which ones should be? MRProgrammer 20:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Fan Service section
We could get into a little more detail here regarding characters, races and action being true to the game. The first movie had virtually no similarity to the game. In this movie, you really get to see the individual professions and how they work together to neutralize threats and solve puzzles. The rogue for example doesn't just pick locks. He also finds hidden doors and defuses traps. The barbarian seems bigger and more aggressive than the fighter, who is more versatile. The paladin seems to recklessly face the dragon because he doesn't like stealth. The wizard can't simply teleport them to their destination because she hasn't 'discovered' it yet. [User:24.211.249.43|24.211.249.43]] 01:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Dam3984.JPG
Image:Dam3984.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
characters
How can the characters be under level 10; one of them has teleport! Characters under level 10 against liches just die; no argument, just die.