Talk:Fruit Ninja: Puss in Boots: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Rdfr: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Restored revision 926036922 by Namcokid47 (talk): Nonsense |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Oppose''' - I think you’re confusing “poor quality” with “notability”. It appears to be a garbage game. But that doesn’t change the fact that reliable sources covered it in significant detail. [[User:Sergecross73|<span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<span style="color:teal">msg me</span>]] 19:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' - I think you’re confusing “poor quality” with “notability”. It appears to be a garbage game. But that doesn’t change the fact that reliable sources covered it in significant detail. [[User:Sergecross73|<span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<span style="color:teal">msg me</span>]] 19:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' - The overall page quality is not a factor for deletion. As from what Jovanmilic posted, it's clearly been covered extensively by reliable sources, so I fail to see how it isn't notable (in fact, you seem to confuse "notability" with "quality", per Sergecross' response). [[User:Namcokid47|<span style="color: #009999">Namcokid</span>]][[User talk:Namcokid47|<span style="color: #cc0000">47</span>]] <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Namcokid47|<span style="color: #0073e6">(Contribs)]]</span></sup> 21:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' - The overall page quality is not a factor for deletion. As from what Jovanmilic posted, it's clearly been covered extensively by reliable sources, so I fail to see how it isn't notable (in fact, you seem to confuse "notability" with "quality", per Sergecross' response). [[User:Namcokid47|<span style="color: #009999">Namcokid</span>]][[User talk:Namcokid47|<span style="color: #cc0000">47</span>]] <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Namcokid47|<span style="color: #0073e6">(Contribs)]]</span></sup> 21:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Ftgttgtgfftvv == |
|||
Ccvcccccvcc [[Special:Contributions/47.160.35.71|47.160.35.71]] ([[User talk:47.160.35.71|talk]]) 12:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Rdfr == |
|||
Ccfffft [[Special:Contributions/47.160.35.71|47.160.35.71]] ([[User talk:47.160.35.71|talk]]) 12:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:30, 19 February 2023
Merger proposed
This was a shortly avaliable app, and it was poorly notable. This should probably be merged into Fruit Ninja as it is poorly notable, it has issues, and it was a short-lived app. MrCoolGuy159 (talk) 23:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per WP:NTEMP, notability isn't temporary. I have found lots of reliable sources that discuss the game: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11], [12]. Passes WP:GNG easily. Will try to improve the article soon. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - I think you’re confusing “poor quality” with “notability”. It appears to be a garbage game. But that doesn’t change the fact that reliable sources covered it in significant detail. Sergecross73 msg me 19:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - The overall page quality is not a factor for deletion. As from what Jovanmilic posted, it's clearly been covered extensively by reliable sources, so I fail to see how it isn't notable (in fact, you seem to confuse "notability" with "quality", per Sergecross' response). Namcokid47 (Contribs) 21:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)