Talk:Femi Kuti: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think this article is poorly written, and needs to be revised to meet a higher standard of quality. Not only is it not chronologically sound, but it also deviates from a "neutral" position by overly praising Femi, beginning to sound more like propaganda. - 66.183.190.88 |
I think this article is poorly written, and needs to be revised to meet a higher standard of quality. Not only is it not chronologically sound, but it also deviates from a "neutral" position by overly praising Femi, beginning to sound more like propaganda. - 66.183.190.88 |
||
:Sorry to blank most of it, but it was a copyvio from the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association website [http://www.laphil.org/resources/performer_detail.cfm?id=1093]. [[User:Tearlach|Tearlach]] 18:00, 2 December 2005 (UTC) |
:Sorry to blank most of it, but it was a copyvio from the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association website [http://www.laphil.org/resources/performer_detail.cfm?id=1093]. Does look a useful reference though. [[User:Tearlach|Tearlach]] 18:00, 2 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:10, 2 December 2005
Revision
I think this article is poorly written, and needs to be revised to meet a higher standard of quality. Not only is it not chronologically sound, but it also deviates from a "neutral" position by overly praising Femi, beginning to sound more like propaganda. - 66.183.190.88
- Sorry to blank most of it, but it was a copyvio from the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association website [1]. Does look a useful reference though. Tearlach 18:00, 2 December 2005 (UTC)