Jump to content

Talk:Food: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by 107.15.9.86 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Gigs. (TW)
Line 55: Line 55:
[[User:Trebecca|Trebecca]] ([[User talk:Trebecca|talk]]) 00:38, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
[[User:Trebecca|Trebecca]] ([[User talk:Trebecca|talk]]) 00:38, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
{{done}} [[User:Gigs|Gigs]] ([[User talk:Gigs|talk]]) 05:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
{{done}} [[User:Gigs|Gigs]] ([[User talk:Gigs|talk]]) 05:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

== Edit request on 7 December 2012 ==

{{edit semi-protected|answered=no}}
<!-- Begin request -->

<!-- End request -->
[[Special:Contributions/208.89.21.34|208.89.21.34]] ([[User talk:208.89.21.34|talk]]) 15:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)kendra kendrakendra kendra

Revision as of 15:59, 7 December 2012

Former good article nomineeFood was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 25, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
March 28, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Template:Findnotice

Assimilation

This looks like a good article, but why doesnt it mention anything about digestion? The lede briefly talks about how "assimilation" occurs after ingestion, but that appears to be it. This article needs a section that overviews digestion and other chemical and physical properties of assimilation. Regards, -Stevertigo (t | c) 05:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC) dfgt78sdt78fguevsr76gtsrg6gduiwtyswghg2hw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.192.35.143 (talk) 21:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vegetarianism

This article looks quite good overall, but the statement that "Vegetarians do not consume meat" is wrong, vegetarianism in itself means that you remove all animal based products like a vegan, but some vegetarians can choose to include for example milk (lacto-vegetarian) or egg (ovo-vegetarian). There are also some semi-vegetarians who choose to eat chicken or fish. Also I would like to suggest that the link on the word vegetarians should be pointed to the article about vegetarianism and not to a list of people who are vegetarians. My reason for that change would be that most people who click on the link will probably click on it to find out more about vegetarian diets and not which people that have a vegetarian diet. Lundibird (talk) 08:05, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Aslong as you put in a reliable source its fine i think. there are multiple and different definitions of vegetarism, but they mainly do not eat meat. so I supose a added sentence is fine if we keep the old oneWitsBlomstein (talk) 01:38, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Humans are Omniviors and so vegitarianism as a human is unnatural — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.184.8.2 (talk) 19:05, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I don't know what to say about this one. Tricky... Coolness107 (talk) 01:06, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was reading the article named 'Food', and under the main article Restaurants, the link to bouillon needs to be changed to the bouillon (soups) link, instead of the Bouillon (Belgium) link in Wikipedia.

Trebecca (talk) 00:38, 20 October 2012 (UTC)  Done Gigs (talk) 05:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 7 December 2012

208.89.21.34 (talk) 15:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)kendra kendrakendra kendra[reply]