Talk:Neeraj Chopra: Difference between revisions
→Caste - why?: Fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
→Caste - why?: Reply |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:wikipedia is about giving more and more accurate information about someone . What is wrong if Neeraj Chopra’s caste is mentioned here ? It is infact a moment of proud for them and country . Going by your point of view , every second information on wikipedia is irrelevant . [[User:Rudradaman127|Rudradaman127]] ([[User talk:Rudradaman127|talk]]) 14:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
:wikipedia is about giving more and more accurate information about someone . What is wrong if Neeraj Chopra’s caste is mentioned here ? It is infact a moment of proud for them and country . Going by your point of view , every second information on wikipedia is irrelevant . [[User:Rudradaman127|Rudradaman127]] ([[User talk:Rudradaman127|talk]]) 14:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
:What you are talking is quite ambiguous. In your words , there is no fixed criteria to judge an information whether it is revelant or not ? Wikipedia is neutral platform made for just providing information . If wikipedia had any problem with caste and its related informations , then many pages representing different castes and communities would not have existed here . Hope you would act without any prejudices . [[User:Rudradaman127|Rudradaman127]] ([[User talk:Rudradaman127|talk]]) 14:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Not honorary rank? == |
== Not honorary rank? == |
Revision as of 14:51, 29 August 2023
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Rank and decoration
(1) A decoration of a serviceman can be used as a honorific suffix, since it is related to his service shouldn't his rank be given too, in this case shouldn't the lead start, Subedar Neeraj Chopra VSM (2) Secondly Subedar is his rank not his honorific, contrary to what is written in the info box. Yogesh Khandke (talk)
Caste - why?
Why is Chopra's caste relevant? I think I remember edits being made to remove the caste from the page because it isn't really relevant, but now I see it's back on again. I'll wait for a while for input before removing it; anyone who has objections can address it in this section. W. Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/c) 08:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- wikipedia is about giving more and more accurate information about someone . What is wrong if Neeraj Chopra’s caste is mentioned here ? It is infact a moment of proud for them and country . Going by your point of view , every second information on wikipedia is irrelevant . Rudradaman127 (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- What you are talking is quite ambiguous. In your words , there is no fixed criteria to judge an information whether it is revelant or not ? Wikipedia is neutral platform made for just providing information . If wikipedia had any problem with caste and its related informations , then many pages representing different castes and communities would not have existed here . Hope you would act without any prejudices . Rudradaman127 (talk) 14:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Not honorary rank?
@Wjemather: Subhedar is not a honorary rank and should be removed from infobox.Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 13:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Athletics articles
- High-importance Athletics articles
- WikiProject Athletics articles
- C-Class India articles
- High-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of High-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class sports articles
- WikiProject Sports articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English