Talk:Niki Ashton: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:12, 15 October 2008

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2005-11-14. The result of the discussion was no consensus. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 April, 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 23:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

This page has eventual value. It has just be created and it's already being nominated for deletion? I view that a page on a probable future politican should be kept. Deleting it now would delete prominate wikipedia knowledge. Voters or other Thompson citizens that want a balanced view on a major canidate would be let down! If she is elected as the MP for this area that would mean this article would have to be recreated. If you feel it is unimportant enought to be an article, at least merge it with something!

Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --PhilipO 21:24, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

should it be merged with a wiki page on vanity articles? SaltyPig 21:25, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NO!!!!

A Northern Politican, who is notable, has an interesting amout of background information, and has became elected as NDP candidate for the ridding (now) would be a great Wikipedia article. Many articles are redirecting to this deleted link. Why shouldn't your Wikipedia reader be entitled to gain knowledge about someone every Wiki page redirects to? This is taughting Wikipedia readers with knowledge, by not giving them it! Wiki is not paper, it has more space, and can be a great referrence.

Canadianism 02:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

-This article in my view is a stub and needs desperately to be worked on, however there is value here, especially as this is the person who took away a sitting MP's nomination when the party is so desperately low on seats.

SHOULD BE DELETED

I SEE NO REASON THAT THIS PAGE SHOULD BE KEPT IN THE WIKIPEDIA FOLD. NOW THAT THE ELECTION IS OVER AND SHE LOST, WHAT EXACTLY IS THE POINT? DOES THE FACT THAT SHE'S A "TRAVELER" MAKE THIS PAGE WORTHY OF STAYING IN AN ONLINE ENCYCLOPEDIA??? I'VE DONE TRAVELING OF MY OWN, BUT I'M NOT IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO BE IN WIKIPEDIA. CAN WE PLEASE COME TO A CONSENSUS ON THIS?

She is a rather newsworthy individual and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of human knowledge. If this doesn't deserve its own article, merge it with Steve Aston. PS: ALL CAPITALS is annoying. Canadianism

RasputinAXP, you shouldn't redirect this page when the AfD voted no consensus, and thus, Keep. CanadianElection 10:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd still like it merged, which I think it should be, you can add the '''{{mergeto|[NDP candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election}}''' tag to this page, and the '''{{mergefrom|Niki Ashton}}''' tag to the ndp candidates page.

Nikki Ashton won the election tonight - and it is spelt Nikki (not Niki). I see no reason for deletion. Should not someone mention the different languages that Nikki can speak? 07:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)07:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:54, 26 June 2007 edit Yamara (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 12,258 edits WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:12, 15 October 2008 edit undo 24.77.37.31 (talk) →‎SHOULD BE DELETED Next edit →
Line 46:		Line 46:

	:*If you'd still like it merged, which I think it should be, you can add the <nowiki>'''{{mergeto\|[NDP candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election}}''' tag to this page, and the '''{{mergefrom\|Niki Ashton}}'''</nowiki> tag to the ndp candidates page.		:*If you'd still like it merged, which I think it should be, you can add the <nowiki>'''{{mergeto\|[NDP candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election}}''' tag to this page, and the '''{{mergefrom\|Niki Ashton}}'''</nowiki> tag to the ndp candidates page.

			Nikki Ashton won the election tonight - and it is spelt Nikki (not Niki). I see no reason for deletion. Should not someone mention the different languages that Nikki can speak? 07:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)07:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)