Talk:Paleoendemism: Difference between revisions
Update Global Change, Ecosystems and the Earth System ENVIRSC 3BO3 assignment details |
→Dominika's Peer Review: new section |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{WP Ecology|class=start|importance=low}} |
{{WP Ecology|class=start|importance=low}} |
||
== Dominika's Peer Review == |
|||
There is a strong start to the article, shown when defining the key words that are being explained. |
|||
It could be useful to separate the article into sections, including headers such as history or reason behind paleoendenism or different countries which have example of paleoendenism. |
|||
I don't recommend starting a sentence with "Because" it stops the flow of the article. |
|||
Some good example of Paleoendemism but these could be sectioned off into separate sections. |
|||
The article is neutral and does not favour a specific side. |
|||
There is no concrete conclusion summarising paleoendenism, however, I presume this is because you have not finished yet. |
|||
Very well done on your article! |
Revision as of 19:18, 28 February 2019
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 9 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Camillegiuliano (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ellinap.
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Ecology Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Dominika's Peer Review
There is a strong start to the article, shown when defining the key words that are being explained. It could be useful to separate the article into sections, including headers such as history or reason behind paleoendenism or different countries which have example of paleoendenism. I don't recommend starting a sentence with "Because" it stops the flow of the article. Some good example of Paleoendemism but these could be sectioned off into separate sections. The article is neutral and does not favour a specific side. There is no concrete conclusion summarising paleoendenism, however, I presume this is because you have not finished yet. Very well done on your article!