Jump to content

Talk:Recognizance: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m wp
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Law|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Canada|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Hong Kong|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Canada|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Scotland|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Hong Kong|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Scotland|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Australia|importance=Low}}
}}


== Globalize tag ==
== Globalize tag ==


I removed the globalize tag because recognizance is a concept unique to the legal systems of the countries mentioned as far as I know. I could be wrong. But there was no explanation on the talk page so I took it out. [[User:Recognizance|Recognizance]] ([[User talk:Recognizance|talk]]) 17:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I removed the globalize tag because recognizance is a concept unique to the legal systems of the countries mentioned as far as I know. I could be wrong. But there was no explanation on the talk page so I took it out. [[User:Recognizance|Recognizance]] ([[User talk:Recognizance|talk]]) 17:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

:Neither England nor Wales is mentioned in the list as a country where the concept applies, yet the specific historical instances cited are from England. So, does recognizance apply in England or not? Or has it been made obsolete? [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C6:F027:6201:F46B:B2B4:B8D0:207F|2A00:23C6:F027:6201:F46B:B2B4:B8D0:207F]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C6:F027:6201:F46B:B2B4:B8D0:207F|talk]]) 21:54, 31 March 2023 (UTC)


It can't be "unique" to three or more countries. It can be peculiar to them, however. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.14.87.76|68.14.87.76]] ([[User talk:68.14.87.76|talk]]) 14:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
It can't be "unique" to three or more countries. It can be peculiar to them, however. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.14.87.76|68.14.87.76]] ([[User talk:68.14.87.76|talk]]) 14:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 13:30, 17 February 2024

Globalize tag[edit]

I removed the globalize tag because recognizance is a concept unique to the legal systems of the countries mentioned as far as I know. I could be wrong. But there was no explanation on the talk page so I took it out. Recognizance (talk) 17:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neither England nor Wales is mentioned in the list as a country where the concept applies, yet the specific historical instances cited are from England. So, does recognizance apply in England or not? Or has it been made obsolete? 2A00:23C6:F027:6201:F46B:B2B4:B8D0:207F (talk) 21:54, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It can't be "unique" to three or more countries. It can be peculiar to them, however. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.87.76 (talk) 14:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]