Jump to content

Talk:RadioShack: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
Bots
1,312,596 edits
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:RadioShack/Archives/2017. (BOT)
Qwertz1894 (talk | contribs)
458 edits
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Companies|class=C|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Companies|class=C|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth|class=C|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth|class=C|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Electronics|class=C|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Electronics|class=C|importance=Mid}}

Revision as of 22:03, 19 September 2020


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on RadioShack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All but the Bloomburg link work. Hopefully I indicated this correctly. Codefenix (talk) 20:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on RadioShack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:14, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on RadioShack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spin off General Wireless Operations into a separate article

Should we spin off General Wireless Operations into a separate article? Tandy Corporation has its own and this seems to be more focused on the brand which is now owned by Kensington Capital Holdings. I have made fixes to the article however it seems to be confusing on what the article is about. Opinions? TheUSConservative (talk) 15:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Standard General. Maybe just expand the RadioShack subsection however you'd like? Codefenix (talk) 17:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

"The longest-running product for Radio Shack was the AM-only Realistic Flavoradio, sold from 1972 to 1986, 15 years in the same design. .. . The Flavoradio carried the Realistic name until about 1998 when it switched to "Radio Shack" then finally "Optimus". When the Flavoradio was dropped from the catalog in 2001, it was the last AM-only radio on the market." This appears to say that the Flavoradio was sold until 1986 but was dropped in 2001. It seems to read that it was in the catalogue for about a decade and a half after it was no longer sold. Is there a mistake here, or am I simply not understanding something? 67.209.128.12 (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:RadioShack&oldid=979284941"