Talk:Rock blasting

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Mining High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached redirect, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles

I'd love to get a citation in here for the usage stats, and perhaps more recent ones as well (given that those in the article are from 1990). And is 500 Tg a correct figure for Australia? That's around a trillion dollars spent just on blasting in 1990 there! Exerda 16:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think so - see [1] (I've added a Harvard-style citation to the article since google books urls are unstable and frowned upon). Lupin|talk|popups 03:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the citation! Exerda 14: 42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Refer to

Can't "blasting" also refer to abrasive blasting? Moberg (talk) 23:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rock blasting is a bit too restricitive, heading should be blasting, the reference to demolition blasting can be incorporated. Need reference to other methods and varients of explosives. Steve. Stevenxlead (talk) 18:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]