Jump to content

Talk:Xenicus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 14: Line 14:
:- Treating ''Xenicus jagmi'' and ''Xenicus yaldwyni'' as separate species (as in the 2016 study) until reliable sources explicitly say otherwise.
:- Treating ''Xenicus jagmi'' and ''Xenicus yaldwyni'' as separate species (as in the 2016 study) until reliable sources explicitly say otherwise.
:- Clean-up [[New Zealand wren]] to reflect the revised taxonomy [[User:Columbianmammoth|Columbianmammoth]] ([[User talk:Columbianmammoth|talk]]) 18:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
:- Clean-up [[New Zealand wren]] to reflect the revised taxonomy [[User:Columbianmammoth|Columbianmammoth]] ([[User talk:Columbianmammoth|talk]]) 18:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
:'''Comment:''' The authoritative Checklist of the Birds of New Zealand (5th edition, 2022) recognizes two species: the North Island stout-legged wren (''Xenicus jagmi'') and South Island stout-legged wren (''Xenicus yaldwyni'').<ref>Miskelly, Colin & Forsdick, Natalie & Gill, Brian & Palma, Ricardo & Rawlence, Nicolas & Tennyson, Alan. (2022). CHECKLIST OF THE BIRDS OF NEW ZEALAND. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361824003_CHECKLIST_OF_THE_BIRDS_OF_NEW_ZEALAND</ref> [[User:Columbianmammoth|Columbianmammoth]] ([[User talk:Columbianmammoth|talk]]) 20:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:11, 4 November 2023

WikiProject iconNew Zealand Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBirds Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconXenicus is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Proposed merge of Pachyplichas into Xenicus

An ancient DNA study from 2016 determined that Pachyplichas is nested within Xenicus.[1] Although this study has been cited several times in relevant Wikipedia articles, seven years on the revised taxonomy has not been fully implemented on Wikipedia. I was able to access the full text through the Wikipedia Library. The discussion section of the study unequivocally confirms that Traversia is a distinct genus (which is good on Wikipedia), while Pachyplichas is a synonym of Xenicus. The study specifically states, "that Pachyplichas jagmi Millener 1988 and Pachyplichas yaldwyni Millener 1988 become Xenicus jagmi and Xenicus yaldwyni, respectively."

I recommend merging Pachyplichas into Xenicus, then determining what clean-up is appropriate for New Zealand wren and other articles. On a related note, I believe that the species pair North Island stout-legged wren and South Islands stout-legged wren should only be represented by a single article. Although the aforementioned study doesn't question their validity as distinct species, both Wikipedia articles are currently stubs. (Consider the articles for the New Zealand goose and adzebills. In each case, only one article represents a genus containing two recently extinct species. I suppose there’s not enough information to talk about to merit splitting the articles on the species level.) Columbianmammoth (talk) 07:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A 2023 paper from Te Papa Press refers to this species as "Xenicus yaldwyni (Millener, 1988)" and "Passeriformes Xenicus yaldwyni (stout-legged wren)," making use of the scientific name from the 2016 study.[2] The 2016 paper didn't sample ancient DNA from the North Island population but recognizes Xenicus jagmi as a separate species anyways. The 2023 paper doesn't mention the existence of Xenicus jagmi as a separate species, but also falls short of explicitly synonymizing it with Xenicus yaldwyni (it simply isn't mentioned).
For now, I recommend:
- Merging Pachyplichas into Xenicus
- Moving North Island stout-legged wren and South Island stout-legged wren to Stout-legged wren (treating two recently extinct species in a single stub, similar to New Zealand goose and adzebills).
- Treating Xenicus jagmi and Xenicus yaldwyni as separate species (as in the 2016 study) until reliable sources explicitly say otherwise.
- Clean-up New Zealand wren to reflect the revised taxonomy Columbianmammoth (talk) 18:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The authoritative Checklist of the Birds of New Zealand (5th edition, 2022) recognizes two species: the North Island stout-legged wren (Xenicus jagmi) and South Island stout-legged wren (Xenicus yaldwyni).[3] Columbianmammoth (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Mitchell, Kieren J.; Wood, Jamie R.; Llamas, Bastien; McLenachan, Patricia A.; Kardailsky, Olga; Scofield, R. Paul; Worthy, Trevor H.; Cooper, Alan (September 2016). "Ancient mitochondrial genomes clarify the evolutionary history of New Zealand's enigmatic acanthisittid wrens". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 102: 295–304. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.05.038. PMID 27261250.
  2. ^ Ioane-Warren, Melanie; Salvador, Rodrigo Brincalepe; Rogers, Karyne M.; Tennyson, Alan J. D. (2023-03-07). "Augustus Hamilton's fossil collection at the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa". doi:10.3897/tuhinga.34.97731. ISSN 1173-4337. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  3. ^ Miskelly, Colin & Forsdick, Natalie & Gill, Brian & Palma, Ricardo & Rawlence, Nicolas & Tennyson, Alan. (2022). CHECKLIST OF THE BIRDS OF NEW ZEALAND. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361824003_CHECKLIST_OF_THE_BIRDS_OF_NEW_ZEALAND