Jump to content

Talk:1980–81 Ipswich Town F.C. season: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
You too can clean up talk pages manually ! Sort order only. Taming talk page clutter and formatting Template:Article history.
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Mich d'Avray==
Changed d'Avray's flag to from South Africe to Eng as he was an England U21 international. (If it were done on Birth place Terry Butcher's would be Singapore)


{{Article history
{{Article history
|action1 = GAN
|action1 = GAN

Revision as of 11:55, 15 January 2024

Mich d'Avray

Changed d'Avray's flag to from South Africe to Eng as he was an England U21 international. (If it were done on Birth place Terry Butcher's would be Singapore)


Featured article1980–81 Ipswich Town F.C. season is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 27, 2020Good article nomineeListed
May 8, 2020Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article
WikiProject iconFootball: England / Season FA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
FAThis article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the season article task force.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



This review is transcluded from Talk:1980–81 Ipswich Town F.C. season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 13:09, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Prose

Lede

General

Everything else seems pretty good to me. Well done. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Vilenski thanks so much for plucking this one off the list. I appreciate it. I think I've answered your notes or fixed them where applicable. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Least I can do, seeings as you've done around 20 of mine! Pretty well written, it was just the lede that needed work. I'm quite happy with this one. Passing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.