Talk:2007 UAW-Ford 500

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

2007 UAW-Ford 500 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 10, 2018. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2007 UAW-Ford 500 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

NASCAR Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.NASCARWikipedia:WikiProject NASCARTemplate:WikiProject NASCARNASCAR articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Motorsport Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2007 UAW-Ford 500/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kpgjhpjm (talk · contribs) 04:23, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let us review this NASCAR article

Lead

Change as the new leader of restrictor plate wins to as the driver with the most restrictor plate wins with twelve
After the sentence Johnson was still leading as the final lap began add but and remove the full stop .

Background

Add space between Nextel Cup Series and and
Remove the word and between fifth and Kyle Busch .
Increased horsepower from 75 to 80 or increase by 75 to 80 .

Practice and Qualifying

Change held the Friday before Sunday's race to held on Friday
The redlink to 2005 Pocono 500 is not required.
Change mandated to start 41st and 42nd to mandateed to start at the back . Kpgj hpjm 15:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Race

It is the first mention of McMurray, so change his name to full and link him .
Remove the words of cars .
Remove the words a narrow margin
Change .Hamlin took the lead to and he took the lead
Johnson was leading on lap 21 , but Hamlin restarted in the lead on lap 22 - Did Johnson make a pit stop.
lost the first position to lost the lead
Weird sentence - Stewart moved past Sadler on the 133rd lap after receiving assistance from Stewart. This needs to be fixed .
Change Then Labonte to Then he
Petty's left or right rear blew . If there is no information write Petty's tire blew

Post-Race

No issues

Comments

@MWright96: On-Hold for now , when these issues are fixed , I will take a final look . The article is solid , though . Kpgjhpjm 15:31, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- {reply|Kpgihplm}} Thanks for the review. Everything has been addressed apart from the McMurray query because he is already mentioned and linked in the practice and qualifying sub-section. MWright96 (talk) 18:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - @MWright96: Promoting, thanks for another solid article. But please be more careful with your pings . Kpgj hpjm 03:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]