Template talk:Regions and administrative divisions of Japan: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Honshū not on the template?: new section |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Japan|class= |
{{WikiProject Japan|class=Template}} |
||
How is having the flag of Japan on the mediawiki being partisan? |
How is having the flag of Japan on the mediawiki being partisan? |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[User:Laug|laug]] ([[User talk:Laug|talk]]) 14:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC) |
[[User:Laug|laug]] ([[User talk:Laug|talk]]) 14:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
: This template is based on the official geographical division used by the government. Honshu is commonly subdivided into the five regions: Tohoku, Kanto, Chubu, Kinki (Kansai) and Chugoku. Although Honshu is a single island, these regions have many differences, including the historical East/West or East/Central/West divide. So "Honshu" is too broad a category here. |
|||
: As for the "Regions" part, I think we need subdivisions of Hokkaido, Tohoku, and Kanto mentioned in this article [[:ja:日本の地域]]: |
|||
: Hokkaido: Dōhoku (North), Dōtō (East), Dōō (Central) and Dōnan (South) |
|||
: Tohoku: Kita-Tōhoku (North) and Minami-Tōhoku (South) |
|||
: Kanto: Kita-Kantō (North) and Minami-Kantō (South) |
|||
: [[User:Shinkansen Fan|Shinkansen Fan]] ([[User talk:Shinkansen Fan|talk]]) 07:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Request for comment == |
|||
<!-- [[User:DoNotArchiveUntil]] 07:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC) --> |
|||
{{notice|1=This is an open '''''invitation''''' for participating in the RFC about the ''utility/redundancy'' of ''[[:Category:City_population_templates|Largest cities/city population templates]] like this'', on '''[[WP:RFC/City population templates]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! [[User:Mrt3366|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:brown;">Mrt</span><span style="font-family:verdana; color:red;">3366</span>]][[User talk:Mrt3366|<span style="font-size:x-small;"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></span>]] <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Mrt3366|action=edit§ion=new&preload=User_talk:Mrt3366/new_section}} <span style="color:green;"><sup>(New thread?)</sup></span>]</span> 07:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC)}} |
Latest revision as of 18:56, 27 February 2023
Japan Template‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
How is having the flag of Japan on the mediawiki being partisan?
Now, the "subdivisions of countries" mediawikis all have the flags of their respective countries.
WhisperToMe 01:52, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
There was a reason I changed those [ foo prefecture ] links to [ foo Prefecture ]... the link should match the article since the link will not be disabled on the appropriate page if it is going through a redirect. There are 2 options, change the template or MOVE the articles (an option that is unavailable to me). -- EmperorBMA|話す 16:26, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Hello, don't you think Honshū (the biggest island) would deserve to appear on this template?
laug (talk) 14:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- This template is based on the official geographical division used by the government. Honshu is commonly subdivided into the five regions: Tohoku, Kanto, Chubu, Kinki (Kansai) and Chugoku. Although Honshu is a single island, these regions have many differences, including the historical East/West or East/Central/West divide. So "Honshu" is too broad a category here.
- As for the "Regions" part, I think we need subdivisions of Hokkaido, Tohoku, and Kanto mentioned in this article ja:日本の地域:
- Hokkaido: Dōhoku (North), Dōtō (East), Dōō (Central) and Dōnan (South)
- Tohoku: Kita-Tōhoku (North) and Minami-Tōhoku (South)
- Kanto: Kita-Kantō (North) and Minami-Kantō (South)
Request for comment[edit]
This is an open invitation for participating in the RFC about the utility/redundancy of Largest cities/city population templates like this, on WP:RFC/City population templates. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! Mrt3366(Talk?) (New thread?) 07:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC) |