Template talk:Scottish Professional Football League: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Response |
wikipedia is not based on opinion |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think 'Heart of Midlothian' and 'Hibernian' should be used as they ARE they official names of the clubs. --[[User:AntzUK|Antz]] 19:46, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
I think 'Heart of Midlothian' and 'Hibernian' should be used as they ARE they official names of the clubs. --[[User:AntzUK|Antz]] 19:46, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
:No-one's denying that; however, the full names are seldom used by the public. Heart of Midlothian is invariably shortened to Hearts and Hibernian to Hibs. I think they're more useful - and far less wordy - in their shortened, common form. [[User:Erath|Erath]] 20:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
:No-one's denying that; however, the full names are seldom used by the public. Heart of Midlothian is invariably shortened to Hearts and Hibernian to Hibs. I think they're more useful - and far less wordy - in their shortened, common form. [[User:Erath|Erath]] 20:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
your point is well put however this is an encyclopaedia. Could we please stick to the facts. Hibernian and Heart of Midlothian is proper. |
|||
[[User:Palx|Palx]] 23:50, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:50, 16 November 2005
I think 'Heart of Midlothian' and 'Hibernian' should be used as they ARE they official names of the clubs. --Antz 19:46, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- No-one's denying that; however, the full names are seldom used by the public. Heart of Midlothian is invariably shortened to Hearts and Hibernian to Hibs. I think they're more useful - and far less wordy - in their shortened, common form. Erath 20:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
your point is well put however this is an encyclopaedia. Could we please stick to the facts. Hibernian and Heart of Midlothian is proper.
Palx 23:50, 16 November 2005 (UTC)