User talk:Dolovis: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Dolovis/Archive 1) (bot |
→Unblocked: new section |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
<small> Delivered by [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]), on behalf of {{noping|National Names 2000}} 10:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC) </small> |
<small> Delivered by [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]), on behalf of {{noping|National Names 2000}} 10:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC) </small> |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Questia/Check_in/List&oldid=655573416 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Questia/Check_in/List&oldid=655573416 --> |
||
== Unblocked == |
|||
Following a successful appeal to the [[WP:BASC|Ban appeals sub-committee]], you have been unblocked under the terms of the [[Wikipedia:Standard Offer]] with the additional condition noted below: |
|||
*You have agreed not to edit any article edited by [[user:Djsasso]] within the previous 30 days. |
|||
This restriction may be enforced at the [[WP:AE|Arbitration enforcement]] page. |
|||
Welcome back. |
|||
For the Ban appeals sub-committee, [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 08:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:45, 2 June 2015
This is Dolovis's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Dolovis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The block is unwarranted. There is no disruptive editing or sock-puppetry. CheckUser evidence was inconclusive. The instigating editor, who lives in the same city as me, has an admitted, demonstrable and long-term COI with me. Pursuant to Wikipedia:Blocking policy, blocks are to be used only to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and my editing has done niether. Dolovis (talk) 18:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I disagree with a couple of comments you have made:
- checkuser evidence suggests that it is
Likely you have abused multiple accounts,
- looking at your block log, there are several blocks, by different admins.
In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
WikiCup 2015 May newsletter
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.
Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
Coemgenus (submissions) was one of several users who worked on improving Ulysses S. Grant. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) took Dragonfly to Good Article for a 3x bonus - and if that wasn't enough, they also took Damselfly there as well for a 2x bonus.
LeftAire (submissions) worked up Alexander Hamilton to Good Article for the maximum bonus. Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and is a level 4 vital article.
The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:30, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
TWL Questia check-in
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
- Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
- When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
- Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
- Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Unblocked
Following a successful appeal to the Ban appeals sub-committee, you have been unblocked under the terms of the Wikipedia:Standard Offer with the additional condition noted below:
- You have agreed not to edit any article edited by user:Djsasso within the previous 30 days.
This restriction may be enforced at the Arbitration enforcement page.
Welcome back.
For the Ban appeals sub-committee, Thryduulf (talk) 08:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC)